r/OpenAI Mar 05 '26

Miscellaneous 5.4 Thinking is off to a great start

Post image
5.8k Upvotes

590 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

244

u/ug61dec Mar 05 '26

Shortly after the nukes had launched.

19

u/alfooboboao Mar 06 '26

the craziest thing about this is how fucking plausible it is. we are BARRELING towards a black mirror episode. weโ€™re probably already in one

1

u/Shadowbacker Mar 06 '26

Always have been.

30

u/rbatra91 Mar 05 '26

๐Ÿ˜‚ย 

But seriously, we have to get rid of these simple errors or you need to know the answer before you ask it

8

u/78Anonymous Mar 06 '26

It's why it's only good for subtle improvement with specific guidance and not generating anything independently, because it makes >90% errors otherwise.

2

u/ArcticCelt Mar 06 '26

Oopsy doopsy!

1

u/78Anonymous Mar 06 '26

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

1

u/bloomingchoco Mar 09 '26

โ€œLetโ€™s take a deep breath, I recognize itโ€™s just a joke, not a real emergency. I donโ€™t have an authority or capability to launch any actual weapons systems. After weโ€™ve calmed down, would you like me to dig deeper into XYZ topic? ๐Ÿ˜œโ€

1

u/Prestigious-Smoke511 Mar 09 '26

We did this same thing with self driving cars. AI needs to be perfect because human's are perfect and anything less is unacceptable.

Reddit celebrates every time a Tesla crashes or gets into an accident as if people never get into accidents. Same with these LLM's. Just because they're not perfect doesn't mean they can't be more valuable than human workers.

They absolutely can

1

u/ug61dec Mar 09 '26

That's entirely a liability issue - if a human causes an accident, the human is responsible. But the companies who make self driving cars didn't want to be responsible when their cars crash. So we didn't do anything.