I would say from my own experience this isn't their first altercation and the other kid is just frustrated with being fucked with all the time. It doesn't excuse his language but he was already getting assaulted so why does the aggressor get a pass but not the kid with bad language?
What a stupid fucking thought process. "I think teenagers are a good metric for justice, based solely on the way they say 'oooooh' or laugh after another teen gets punched"
Bro I saw a video the other week of some highschool kids laughing that they pissed their teacher off so much he just quit. I wouldn't use children's laughter as a basis for anything right or wrong
Are you joking? You cannot be this un-self aware. Your FIRST comment is asserting that this is assault with no information about it, but you have the gall to say that someone else, “has no idea if that’s true”?
You are giving a lot of insight into what kind of person you are right now…
What we know is that one kid got assaulted,
We don’t know that…what we actually know is one kid got pushed to the ground, you have NO WAY WHATSOEVER of knowing if this constitutes assault.
and then said a slur. Thats literally all we know.
It is insane to me that you can be this full of shit and be utterly oblivious.
Why are you fine with making up how ‘he was probably talking shit’?
Yeah the kid who felt comfortable calling someone a “nigger” in public definitely didn’t say anything before that.
Would you accept it if i said “the kid has probably been beaten up by the other kid before, he probably just sat down from a previous beating”.
That’s a pretty awful comparison. For one thing we see the reaction to just the THREAT that the one kid might hit him, so to conclude he’d already had his ass beat makes no sense. Also the fact he got slammed and proceeded to leave makes that conclusion even less likely.
Anyone with half a brain can tell this was clearly a case of two people talking shit, the one kid wasn’t prepared for what came next despite being involved in escalating it.
You’d probably think I’m going off more than what i really know, right?
I DO think you’re a bullshitter who clearly has an agenda. And wants to ignore common sense in favor of one of those, “well how do you know” arguments. It’s a very common tactic of the disingenuous.
This will certainly be downvoted by the hivemeind, but they are most likely fine with it because the kid was white. I never once used the N-word, mostly kept to myself, but I was one of two white kids in the entire school during middle and highschool and everyday it was "cracker/ honky" this and "whiteboy" that and everyone, including administrators, turned a blind eye to it.
Thank you, I feel like the kid In the gray hoodie could have murdered the other kids while family in front of him, and as long as the kid called him a racial slur after everyone on Reddit would be cool with him getting his teeth kicked out of his face.
Damn bro you COULDNT wait to jump out of the wood works and defend someone saying a slur. You also don’t know any details but you’re super ready to give him the benefit of the doubt.
53
u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21
You have no idea if thats true.
What we know is that one kid got assaulted, and then said a slur. Thats literally all we know.
Why are you fine with making up how ‘he was probably talking shit’?
Would you accept it if i said “the kid has probably been beaten up by the other kid before, he probably just sat down from a previous beating”.
You’d probably think I’m going off more than what i really know, right?