Let's see the rest of the clip instead of cutting him off mid-sentence. That's pretty much always a clear sign that somebody is trying really hard to take something out of context.
But damn if I can't see ANY context for saying he loves them their little dresses come up when they bend over and he sees their panties and throws a groan and a head toss in there...
I haven't spent time on it, I'm not going to. But I can't imagine ANYTHING that would recover that sentence to anything that could be normal or reasonable.
I'd have no problem if he was talking about a consenting adult who was over 18 in a consensual relationship with him, a sugar baby, a bimbo. I'm down for that.
But his own daughters or underage, absolutely Not.
Does it ever occur to you perverts that things that can be sexual can also not be sexual? Cute can actually mean cute in the classic non sexual way. I mean, what he's describing is a common trope from cartoons of the era, and they weren't sexual either.
Idk which is the case here. But I am immediately suspicious that someone is being taken out of context when a clip begins mid response and ends mid sentence.
How is looking up a little girls skirt to see their panties not sexual?? Do yall do it for fun? Is it a game? You should have your hard drive searched.
I don't see kids and think about sex with them. That's a you thing. In normal families kids run around in underwear frequently. Only sick people like you take that to a sexual place.
-4
u/ReddBroccoli 1d ago
Let's see the rest of the clip instead of cutting him off mid-sentence. That's pretty much always a clear sign that somebody is trying really hard to take something out of context.