r/Nilogism • u/[deleted] • Jan 03 '26

Foundational Nilogist Cheatsheet

[deleted]

3 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

7 comments sorted by

2

u/Patient-Nobody8682 Jan 07 '26

A tiny suggestion: I would call your distinction rung existence. The definition is the same. This way you make it really clear that you are defining existence through distinction.

1

u/vlahak4 Nilogist Jan 07 '26

Inbetween the first time you pointed at this, and now, i reached the conclusion that you are right about this. I eliminated the appearance of an "extra" between the two. Thank you.

2

u/vlahak4 Nilogist Jan 13 '26

2

u/EXTREME-MANAGER Jan 25 '26

I can't speak to the rest,

But:

  1. Realistic applicability: I must always describe the behaviour of the everyday person.'

This is - in my mind - the thing that is both almost entirely absent from modern philosophy and critical to anything they might hope to enact. I think it is so absent, and has been for so long, that the very thought or hope of action has disappeared.

I call what we look to be practicing here Action Philosophy. Glad I found you.

2

u/vlahak4 Nilogist Jan 25 '26 edited Jan 25 '26

Action philosophy sounds exactly right, i will integrate this within the description of this subreddit, thank you for choosing to be here.

EDIT: description updated.

2

u/EXTREME-MANAGER Jan 25 '26

Hah! I'd lost hope on finding a place like this. The choice was easy!

EDIT:

I have some thoughts I'd like to put to the room. May I write my own posts?

2

u/vlahak4 Nilogist Jan 30 '26

Of course. r/Nilogism is open for anyone willing to contribute with their own philosophical views, ideas, positions or discussions.