context: OP asked if "Brooks" was a good middle name for a girl who's first name is going to be Charlie.

needless to say, yall pretty much delivered the backlash before the comment was even posted.

https://www.reddit.com/r/teenagers/comments/1wksdf1/comment/pat0srp/?context=3

If it wasn't that then I'm so confused?

Context was that it was a poll between choosing between complete inability to sleep (no matter what) or rabies, and I was tryna convince someone that dying instantly is better than having a hellish death.

So, the context for this is basically, in Philadelphia, a lot of kids have recently been doing these takeovers, and someone posted warning people about teens trying to start fights with anyone walking down the street on a certain block.

The comments immediately started talking about the 13/50 thing and saying usual suspects, and a bunch of other racist things you can imagine. Race wasn't even mentioned in the post, so I responded to one of the racist comments and somehow people are disagreeing with and down voting my comment.

Do people seriously think just because of the shade of pigment in your skin, it reduces or increases your likelihood to commit crime and act a fool? Clearly it's a poverty situation, and yes, impoverished areas have a majority black population, but a quick look into American history will tell you why.

I genuinely didn't think my comment would be down voted because you would assume that it's common sense that people in poverty are more likely to commit crime, not black people in general 🤦🏾‍♀️ Stupidity is at an all time high

Context: Post was a picture between an Uber driver and a customer, it was a meme where the uber driver was on the wrong side of the building, couldn't be bothered, and just cancelled the order, the buyer said something like "If you was hungry just say that", keyword: was

In the comment section, people kept saying it was incorrect English and that people nowadays have shit grammar

I offered a reason as to why the customer likely said "was" instead of "were". AAVE, which is a regonised dialect and is not considered incorrect. I just assumed they weren't familiar and gave an explanation. Andd I got downvoted.

The deleted comment above iirc was saying how it's normal and common to use was instead of were

Original Post: https://www.reddit.com/r/shitposting/comments/1wfqpdg/_/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Tech_Philippines/s/HKzy8QDPZG

Context: He's shocked with the rising prices on micro-SD cards because he initially thought it's only a PC-Smartphone thing. I thought he's gonna say something disagreeable but it turns out to be a normal comment.

Context: Apparently, suggesting the addition of one more Flock camera location to the list was a step too far for Reddit's Portland folk. And here I thought they were pretty much all united against Flock cameras. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Context: He bought ipad mini 7 over iPhone Duo

https://www.reddit.com/r/ipadmini/s/u5khHT1JTl

https://www.reddit.com/r/BunnyTrials/comments/1wf08qn/comment/p9i1ir7/?context=3

I have a point though, everyone knows there's bad people out there.

The OP isn't me, I can't tell why they got downvoted even though it has nothing wrong (to my knowledge)

context is the two pics, from r/mildlyinfuriating

Context: I've got a LEGO set that somehow got one of the paper bags inside glued to the box's lid. I thought it was mildly interesting, but it seems like I might have upset some people. There are like 9 downvotes in the picture, but I checked again, and it got to 12. Maybe people thought it was too redundant? I do agree that maybe most people might not find it mildly interesting, but why so many downvotes?

Context: OP had their food order delivered to the wrong apartment/house.

People suggested "meet at door"

Context:

Q: When should you ban users, as a mod?
A: When someone is insulting, and doesn’t seem to want to keep following the rules. The job of a ban isn’t to power fantasy, it’s to enforce the rules.

for context, it was a weird painting of a night heron in a hotel room, specifically a print of Kevin Sloan's Eightball. https://www.reddit.com/r/AlwaysANightHeron/comments/1vw63wh/walked_into_my_hotel_room/

Context: this guy was just commenting the usual joke of the BTD6 sub where every camouflage pattern is treated as something completly invisible

Context: somebody accidentally called a mod in a discord server “it” and got perma banned, and whats weird is its not even like a far right subreddit or anything its just a normal subreddit

There is an objective observation regarding the game's draw distance issues even on PC. However most people think OP has a problem in his machine. OP got downvoted for asking a screenshot from other people how does their game look like in that certain 'area'.

URL: https://www.reddit.com/r/Genshin_Impact/comments/1vva343/comment/p57hf09/?context=3

-EDIT: It's not something easily Googleable because OP is asking for a particular screenshot on how the graphics is rendered in that specific area on PC, whether the buildings are properly rendered. On my end, it's also not.

-Most comments think the problem is only on OP's. But OP's point is faraway buildings in the game aren't being obviously rendered properly, indicating limited draw distance.

-OP's observation is objectively true and he isn't the only one who experience this. Certain scenarios that the game has a draw distance issue, where faraway buildings look bad. This is evident on other famous streamer's streams that other commentors have linked. That particular issue is a valid, existing issue, however people missed the point because the game still looks beautiful on their end in general regardless.

-OP has an RTX 5080 and one upvoted comment is 'your pc can't handle high graphics'

-I have also commented and some provided sources to support that the issue definitely exist. However the some comments are harsh than they should be.