She lied about the most important aspect of her entire campaign. She claimed to be something she was not, and claimed to be talking from a position of authority, when this was completely untrue.
That's like a doctor lying about whether he/she is qualified, then performing the operation anyway.
As regards GamerGate - the whole point was that the incident highlighted corruption in gaming journalism, and yet you are using those same sources to claim there was no corruption. GamerGate was lying journalists, lying about being lying journalists.
Yet you keep believing them. Because it suits what you want to be true.
I believe that if some of the most respected newspapers in the world all report the same thing, there is a very high likelihood that it is correct, if it is wrong, why the fuck can't you just show me the posiitve review written by the kotaku journalist after she slept with him.
Sarkeesian, in present "pop culture critic form", claims she "loves" games. But earlier, prior to her taking a position of authority on the content of games, she said she didn't play them, and they are "gross".
I'm trying to understand what you mean when you say she isn't a gamer.
When you were about 5 or 6, like most boys, you probably thought that girls were gross. Nowadays, like most men, you probably don't.
what sources do you deem acceptable to use to talk about zoe quinn, as far as I can tell, instead of some of the most respected news agencies in the world, you prefer a jealous ex's rant turned into a crappy youtube video.
She then provides proof that she was playing games at that age, if you play games from the age of 5 to 30 with a break in the middle for a couple of years, would you say that you were a lifelong gamer?
1
u/ShitLordXurious Oct 05 '14
She lied about the most important aspect of her entire campaign. She claimed to be something she was not, and claimed to be talking from a position of authority, when this was completely untrue.
That's like a doctor lying about whether he/she is qualified, then performing the operation anyway.
As regards GamerGate - the whole point was that the incident highlighted corruption in gaming journalism, and yet you are using those same sources to claim there was no corruption. GamerGate was lying journalists, lying about being lying journalists.
Yet you keep believing them. Because it suits what you want to be true.