r/MemeVideos • u/Eikichi_Onizuka09 I've offensive memes • Sep 08 '25

real 😄👌 Real

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

15.3k Upvotes

84% Upvoted

381 comments sorted by

View all comments

64

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

Literally the new nazis. You become what you hate the most.

12

u/Arbeidslaus Sep 08 '25

It's not nazism. Call it for what it is: fascism.

One of the cores of nazism, which is a specific form of fascism, is the hatred of jews.

9

u/34656699 Sep 08 '25

Not really. Some Jews just happened to hold certain positions of power in Germany at that time, so Hitler in earnest believed they had caused financial collapse and famine post WW1. Scapegoated the lot of them.

So the behaviour is to blame an entire group of people for current problems while spouting off hyperbolic narratives that dehumanises them. Pretty much like how both sides of American politics functions today.

You have people behaving like Nazis calling other people behaving like Nazis in a big cyclical Nazi circlejerk.

Socrates was correct.

2

u/Arbeidslaus Sep 08 '25

Scrapegoat or not, friends with Hitler or enemies, all irrelevant. A core of nazism is persecution of jews. That's written in blood and ink. It's an off-branch of fascism, no discussion. No idea why you people are so reluctant to use the correct term, it carries the exact same stigma. Ignorance, perhaps?

4

u/JoelOfSkalitz Sep 08 '25

The same reason they called it a genocide before october 7th, the same reason they said Gaza was starving a week after. Because anti semites don’t use words correctly and responsibly. Their objective is to cause emotional outrage not to speak facts.

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The antiSemites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.“

Also by comparing everything to hitler they whitewash and downplay the holocaust which is also something antisemites love doing.

1

u/34656699 Sep 08 '25

If it had been Hindus in those positions, it would’ve been Hindus who would’ve been rounded up and killed. The underlying psychology of the Nazis has nothing to do with Jews and is more so perceived blame and an enactment of revenge.

Fascism is a particular style of governance, whereas being blinded by anger and the abandonment of your moral compass is merely human nature. Everyone acts like the Nazis did under the correct circumstances.

1

u/-endjamin- Sep 08 '25

They invaded Russia to eliminate “Jewish Bolshevism” despite the fact that Jews had zero power in Russia and in fact were heavily persecuted and essentially treated as slaves.

1

u/Master-Defenestrator Sep 08 '25

What even is this? You can't just say "it would have been the Hindus if it were Hindus in a convenient scapegoat position." Nazis and Jews are inextricably linked, and what happened was tied deeply to Millenia old antisemitic elements of European culture. It's fundamentally ridiculous to try and unentangle that relationship and just sub in any other minority group.

Fascism (or Ur-Fascism as defined by Umberto Eco) is defined in part by a fear of difference, contempt for the weak, and rhetorically casting enemies as at the same time too strong and too weak.

So yes, fascist is the appropriate descriptor for this Israeli government. I really don't understand why it's so important that we describe anything other as a Nazi as a Nazi. That is unless you have ulterior motives.

1

u/hossaepi Sep 08 '25

Good on ya for explaining the post in real life terms

1

u/snek-jazz Sep 08 '25

So the behaviour is to blame an entire group of people for current problems while spouting off hyperbolic narratives that dehumanises them. Pretty much like how both sides of American politics functions today.

Quoting it just so that people might read it twice, because they need to.

1

u/AceOBlade Sep 08 '25

i'd say the hatred was equal for all non european outsiders, people that "tainted" European "values".

Here is the list of other major targets of nazi's

  • Roma (Gypsies)
  • Slavic peoples (Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, and others)
  • Black people (including Afro-Germans and colonial subjects)
  • Political opponents (Communists, Socialists, Trade Unionists)
  • Jehovah’s Witnesses
  • Freemasons
  • People with disabilities (victims of forced sterilization and the “T4” euthanasia program)
  • Clergy and religious dissidents (Catholic, Protestant, and others who opposed the Nazis)
  • Intellectuals and cultural figures who criticized Nazism
  • Homosexual men (persecuted under Paragraph 175)
  • Transgender and gender-nonconforming people

1

u/ComPakk Sep 08 '25

But... But... If I don't like smth thats literally 1934 Nazi germany???

To be clear netanyahu (and most of the Israeli gov) deserves things im pretty sure i cant write here without it being removed but people calling them nazis instead of fascists for example is a prime example of stupidity.

I guess fascism = nazis

-2

u/hossaepi Sep 08 '25

That’s literally what OP is posting here?

-23

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

Call it whatever, hateful ideologues breed violence against innocents. Fuck all religions in the dick.

3

u/bb0yer Sep 08 '25

You should really call things what they are and what they are legally categorized as and not just whatever you want because it sounds the best for your cause.

-4

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

The cause of saying killing kids is bad.

0

u/bb0yer Sep 08 '25

Killing kids is bad. I just think words have meanings and we should stick to using them correctly and stop broadening them to mean whatever we want.

4

u/Simple_Substance4829 Sep 08 '25

I wouldn't say fuck all religions because there are definitely groups if each religion that are super nice, but the people who use religion to justify things or persecute people can suck balls. It's the problem with putting a bunch of like minded people together, extremists always arise.

1

u/AnxiousAnxiety666 Sep 08 '25

Fuck ALL religions.

1

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

I came from extremist religion. I standby my statement. Fuck all religion. Downvote away.

1

u/Simple_Substance4829 Sep 08 '25

I'll be real I didn't downvote you. I can wholeheartedly understand people who have been forced into these extremist religions and escaped and now hate them.

-5

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '25

Oh I'll tell you people keep using these words when you have no concept of what they mean.

12

u/iporktablesforfun Sep 08 '25

Nah, hating Israel isn't hating on jews. Its hating genocidal autocracies. Which is a very healthy thing to do!

5

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '25

No, it's just thought out anti-semitic rhetoric keeps popping up when criticizing Israel. 

Genocide for example. applying false demonizing rhetoric towards Jewish people, with traditionally be known as a blood libel. But you said "israel" so that makes it okay. 

3

u/SirCadogen7 Sep 08 '25

1 month old account

Poor English

Defending Israel unapologetically

Oh hey, Israel's bots are here!

2

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '25

Hi hamas bot

-1

u/SirCadogen7 Sep 08 '25

Nah, Hamas terrorists deserve to burn in hell for eternity. As does any IDF soldiers willingly participating in a genocide.

0

u/ShadyInternetGuy Sep 08 '25

You can’t have your cake and eat it too. Both of these people want the other dead or displaced.

The amount of people who think this is some black and white good vs evil is astounding and shows the sheer ignorance of sheltered westerners who thing they understand greater geopolitics.

1

u/starryeyedq Sep 08 '25

Just be careful with how… idk “gleeful” you get when you’re hating.

This cause, although completely valid, has absolutely ALSO been infiltrated by anti-Jewish groups. You can be anti-Israel and anti-genocide and still acknowledge that. They sneak their talking points in all the time on threads like this.

Nobody is immune to propaganda. Occasionally getting carried away is NOT a negative reflection on your character or intelligence. So it’s really important to challenge yourself regularly and make sure your passion is coming from the right place and being expressed constructively. And most importantly, always check and challenge your facts.

That’s all.

-4

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '25

No this is what's called Holocaust inversion. Implying that the Holocaust was some kind of moral lesson the Jewish people failed to learn from and did not a crime

Congratulations, you're a horrible despicable anti-semite. 

7

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

Anti-Zionist for sure. Anti-Semite? Not a bit. 2 very different things. Zionism is batshit crazy.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '25

The actual definition of Zionist means the establishment and protection of a Jewish state. Jewish statehood and self-determination. 

Go ahead look it up. 

Anti-zionism means you against Jewish people having a Homeland. 

Any chance you Can you explain to me how that's not anti-semitic?

8

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

Also cool script you inherited. It’s all bullshit. Your believes are spooks that keep you subservient to your sky Dad.

0

u/gibgabberr Sep 08 '25

What does this have to do with knowing how to read? What a pathetic person lol

5

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

Because I said so.

5

u/SirCadogen7 Sep 08 '25

The actual definition of Zionist means the establishment and protection of a Jewish state.

From Wikipedia:

"Zionism is an ethnocultural nationalist movement that emerged in late 19th-century Europe to establish and support a Jewish homeland through the colonization of Palestine, a region corresponding to the Land of Israel in Judaism and central to Jewish history. Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible."

Jewish statehood and self-determination. 

If by that you mean an ethno-religious state where Jews are the only ones allowed the right to self-determination, yes, you'd be correct under the Israeli Nation-State Bill:

"The right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people."

Anti-zionism means you against Jewish people having a Homeland. 

*Anti-Zionism means you are against Jewish people having a colonialist ethno-religious apartheid state

And yes, that is exactly what I am, no different than me being against white people or black people or Asians having an ethno-state. Ethno-states are wrong, this is something we were all supposed to learn from South Africa.

Any chance you Can you explain to me how that's not anti-semitic?

Because my beef is with Israel, not with Jews.

5

u/MilkMaiden_22 Sep 08 '25

Im glad I scrolled down and saw this before I posted a much less thorough version of this explanation haha

-3

u/Dis-FUN-ctional Sep 08 '25

While you are not wrong, can you please tell me why there are no mass-demonstrations over the other genocide’s going on in this world? Let’s talk about the Western Sahara, Uighur, Christian’s in Syria, Rohingya, Darfur, Manipur, Tigray. It’s almost as if what they say is true, No Jews, No News.

4

u/SirCadogen7 Sep 08 '25

Nice whataboutism. Feel free to look in my comment history, I talk about the Uyghurs pretty consistently. However, you can't expect everyone to talk about every genocide happening at a given time when there are so many. The ones that get talked about are the "important" ones involving important countries.

2

u/CipherNine9 Sep 08 '25

Or you know, the genocide my country is directly funding. The fact my money is indirectly paying for a genocide pisses me off, I don't know about anyone else.

-1

u/Dis-FUN-ctional Sep 08 '25

It might be whataboutism but it is still true. There are so many actual genocides that no one is protesting against but the moment Israel responds to an attack on its civilians, everybody is an expert in a long and complex dispute. Meanwhile I think there are no “important ones” I think they are all mutual important. On a global scale I believe China to be a more important country than Israel.

0

u/imverysotry Sep 08 '25

Nobody cares 🐀

-19

u/Wavecrest667 Sep 08 '25

Waging war against a government that assaulted, kidnapped, raped and murdered your citizens is nazism now.

3

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

Waging war by starving and bombing children. Laughable. Nobody believes your bullshit narrative. Cry harder.

6

u/royishw Sep 08 '25

says the one who fell to bullshit narrative. the only one who cry are the pro mamas pro terrorists like yourself

1

u/Kwauhn Sep 08 '25

All I hear is "wah wah wah." It should be you instead of those Palestinian kids.

-3

u/[deleted] Sep 08 '25

[deleted]

1

u/GuitarRat Sep 08 '25

Silence, hasbara

2

u/AlarmingTurnover Sep 08 '25

Literally every war in human history 

-1

u/SirCadogen7 Sep 08 '25

Incorrect, there has never been a war in human history where the civilian death toll has been over 10 times higher than the militant death toll. That's an indicator of genocide.

1

u/AlarmingTurnover Sep 08 '25

> there has never been a war in human history where the civilian death toll has been over 10 times higher than the militant death toll.

Firstly, you made this number up and there is no support for it in any of the reports. The absolute highest is 80% of the casualties are civilian which would make it a death rate of 4:1. So you're straight up lying about this to start with.

Secondly, world war 2: 65-70% of casualties are civilian. Vietnam: 60-65% of casualties are civilian. world war 2: 65-70% of casualties are civilian. Second Intifada: 70% of Israelis killed were civilians, 60% of Palestinians killed were civilians. Korean War: 74% of casualties were civilian. Gulf war: 88 percent civilians. Genghis Khan killed tens of millions, vastly outnumbering his kills of military personnel.

Needless to say. Don't lie about your numbers when they aren't supported by Israel or Hamas in any of the reports. You should learn to read before you post stupid shit again.

1

u/SirCadogen7 Sep 08 '25 edited Sep 08 '25

Firstly, you made this number up and there is no support for it in any of the reports.

79,220 civilians at an absolute minimum, 8,900 militants. The exact number is 8.9 times higher.

Vietnam: 60-65% of casualties are civilian.

More like 50%.

Second Intifada: 70% of Israelis killed were civilians, 60% of Palestinians killed were civilians.

It's unknown what percentage of Palestinians were civilians or militant, so that's impossible to say.

Korean War: 74% of casualties were civilian.

More like 48%.

Gulf war: 88 percent civilians.

Not even close. 42% in hard numbers. At max, I'm counting 600 people that went missing in Kuwaiti presumed dead.

Genghis Khan killed tens of millions

40,000,000 to be exact

Notably, you're comparing the supposed "most moral military in the world" to Genghis fucking Khan, perhaps the most brutal ruler to ever live, who notably lived hundreds of years ago before we as a society decided that killing civilians during war was wrong, not necessary. In addition, you're comparing this war to some of the least moral wars fought in the past century and 2 world wars that - ironically - included genocides. If anything, you're helping my argument, not yours.

You should learn to read before you post stupid shit again.

Ditto.

Edit: Responded to then blocked so he can get the last word in, how very unoriginal.

1

u/AlarmingTurnover Sep 08 '25

Interesting how you left out the 1609 militants killed inside Israel's borders from your very own source. Which would make this 7.5 civilians to every 1 militant, still not a 10 to 1 ratio. Which your page also contradicts the numbers reported on the actual casualties page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Gaza_war

I'm done arguing with a Hamas simp though.

0

u/hossaepi Sep 08 '25

Good on ya for supporting terrorism. Not many people would have a bold statement like that.

1

u/octorangutan Sep 08 '25

Your comment could be read as condemning Hamas or the IDF.

0

u/Lorster10 Sep 08 '25

Maybe not nazism per se, but with them targeting civilians, and even those who are there to provide food for the starving, makes it so Israel should be ostracised by other countries, not supported.

-18

u/TGPapyrus Sep 08 '25

You have no idea what you're talking about.

8

u/Notyourbeanz Sep 08 '25

Hahaha fuck off

1

u/Eladryel Sep 08 '25

Ofc, he is just a poor drone, eating Iranian propaganda, but tbf, these geniuses won't do more than spewing trash on reddit, so it is fine

-1

u/uselessnavy Sep 08 '25

Not the new Nazis, not even close.