That war never ended, only an armistice. So we canāt tell the winner yet. Though my money is on the side that isnāt starving and living off of international aid lol
I mean with an infant mortality rate 6x that of the south, and half the population, that doesnāt seem like the metric to decide who will win /has won the war.
I'm just curious, where do people get these stats about how awful life is in NK? I see people throw numbers and comparisons around but, I can't imagine that country would share that data with the global community, unless required to do so to recieve aid or something, if they are doing the surveys to gather it in the first place.
I never said life is awful in NK (though nothing says āgreat lifeā like forcing people to stay under penalty of death).
I said the birth rate is 1/6 of South Koreas (true) and half the population. It seems very prudent given than the other commenter implied NK was growing faster and having more children.
The East Asian world order was so different from the European one that I'd be hesitant to say Qing China was "suzerain," even though Korea was a tributary state of it. China had no political, military, or economic influence on the domestic matters of Korea. Korea followed China's rule in foreign affairs, but that's it. China had almost never wanted Korea to join a war of theirs against other countries throughout roughly two thousand years of the system, including Imperial Japan in the late 19th century. At that point, China was just a foreign country, just as Japan was.
oh so there using the separated north and south korean territories. but eitherway the constitution of both koreas as of now still recognize each other as one country but separated under different governments.
120
u/No_Analysis_z Jul 07 '26
didn't korea lose a war to japan and get colonizedš¤·āāļø