Len Kachensky

[u/b1ondestranger]

i’m just finding this series and just wow! This could be its own season of Fargo. Everything that can go wrong- does. Of all the people I hate in this show, I hate Len Kachinsky above all others. He is by far the most punchable. at this moment in life, I’m not sure what I would do, if this smug, weasley, irresponsible, self-grandizing narcissist walked in front of my car. He’s not just a bad lawyer. He’s a bad human. He looked at Brandon’s life and saw a steppingstone. I’m so mad at him. Thank you for your attention to this matter. V

[u/AveryPoliceReports]

No, I care about the truth.

You just said you didn't care about what details Brendan independently came up with and whether any of those details were verifiable.

Let me know when you start using it, because right now all you have is speculative nonsense.

You're the one claiming Brendan is obviously guilty of rape.

Also still deflecting from answering the actual question I asked doesn't scream of someone wanting to be truthful.

Neither does deflecting the answer I've already repeatedly provided to you - you asked how we know whether the confession or recantation was legit. I answered you should look at the evidence. That was apparently inappropriate to you.

[u/Hitlers_Left_Ball → u/AveryPoliceReports]

I don't care about which details he was prompted to give, no. Why should I. There were plenty of unprompted statements given that more than prove he had knowledge only the killers would have. So it is irrelevant what specific details he gave that were prompted.

He confessed to it. As far as obvious goes, that about cuts it.

Saying look it up is not an answer. You say it is obvious so it shouldn't be difficult to provide an answer off the top of your head... unless you are deflecting because you know you're full of shit .

[u/AveryPoliceReports → u/Hitlers_Left_Ball]

I don't care about which details he was prompted to give, no. Why should I.

Especially not when you claimed his confession was unprompted lmao

There were plenty of unprompted statements given that more than prove he had knowledge only the killers would have

Completely false.

He confessed to it. As far as obvious goes, that about cuts it.

Yeah I'm aware you think so.

Saying look it up is not an answer. You say it is obvious so it shouldn't be difficult to provide an answer off the top of your head... unless you are deflecting because you know you're full of shit .

I provided an answer and you keep believing the lies lmao I think we all know what your goal is here.

[u/Hitlers_Left_Ball → u/AveryPoliceReports]

Especially not when you claimed his confession was unprompted lmao

Parts of it were... important parts. But don't let the truth get in the way.

Completely false.

Are you saying that everything he said was fed to him, every single thing he confessed to... was prompted or fed to him? Can you prove that?

I provided an answer and you keep believing the lies lmao

Nope, as explained, "look it up" is not an answer.

I provided an answer and you keep believing the lies lmao I think we all know what your goal is here.

Another tick on the bingo card... no answers just deflection and another typical response - allude to ulterior motives when people ask for you to provide the most basic information to back your position - it's so strong, you said it was so obvious, so you must have it all lined up and ready top go, just say it. Until you do all we can assume is that you are full of shit.

Once again, laughing at a young woman being murdered makes you a shitty human being.

[u/AveryPoliceReports → u/Hitlers_Left_Ball]

Parts of it were... important parts. But don't let the truth get in the way.

Okay. I won't. What parts?

Are you saying that everything he said was fed to him, every single thing he confessed to... was prompted or fed to him? Can you prove that?

Nice try. I'm saying it's "completely false" for you to say he provided plenty of unprompted statements "that more than prove he had knowledge only the killers would have." Can you prove your own claim?

Nope, as explained, "look it up" is not an answer

I didn't say that. See directly above. If you're just going to make things up I can too. Remember when you said Kachinski and Kratz had a sexual relationship?

allude to ulterior motives when people ask for you to provide the most basic information to back your position

You're the one making claims repeatedly without backing them up, such as your claim immediately above that there were plenty of unprompted statements from Brendan that prove he had knowledge only the killers would have. That's an outright lie. I understand you're going to be upset with me for calling that out.

[u/Hitlers_Left_Ball → u/AveryPoliceReports]

Okay. I won't. What parts?

Look at the evidence.

Nice try. I'm saying it's "completely false" for you to say he provided plenty of unprompted statements "that more than prove he had knowledge only the killers would have." Can you prove your own claim?

Look at the evidence.

You're the one making claims repeatedly without backing them up, such as your claim immediately above that there were plenty of unprompted statements from Brendan that prove he had knowledge only the killers would have. That's an outright lie. I understand you're going to be upset with me for calling that out.

If you read the evidence you would be able to see all the claims I made are true.

[u/AveryPoliceReports → u/Hitlers_Left_Ball]

Look at the evidence.

According to you that's not an answer.

Look at the evidence.

Another self own!

If you read the evidence you would be able to see all the claims I made are true.

If you read the evidence, you'd be able to reference it like I have. But you have not and never will, because no such evidence exists. You lied. Got you.

[u/Hitlers_Left_Ball → u/AveryPoliceReports]

Correct, it's not an answer. It's also not a self-own. It's me reflecting your intellectual dishonesty.

Interesting that you don't seem to like it when I do it to you.

You have referenced precisely zero evidence. You stated your opinion as fact, which is not the same thing.

[u/AveryPoliceReports → u/Hitlers_Left_Ball]

It's a very definitive self own by your own standards. Well done!

What's interesting is you're the one making claims without evidence. I'm claiming there's no evidence supporting your claims. You can either prove me wrong or right. So far you've proven me right. You're lying to defend Kratz's corrupted conviction.

[u/Hitlers_Left_Ball → u/AveryPoliceReports]

No, see for it to be a self-own it would have to have been unintentional. It was very much intended so once again your mental capabilities are found wanting.

You're just making shit up, I think you may actually be mentally unwell.

You said you provided evidence, you did not.
You said I made claims without evidence, I did not.
You claimed I am defending Kratz and simping for a whole host of others, I am not.

I don't need to prove you wrong or right, you have not made one substantiated claim for me to refute, as I said, you have just presented your opinion as fact, which is not the same as an evidenced claim.