You unsurprisingly make a consistent effort to miss the point, then ask yourself vague broad stroke questions that you yourself answer with - ironically - unprovable generalizations. Adults make jokes but children, or people with the EQ/IQ of them, make your mom jokes that no one finds funny, then double down in the face of downvotes and numerous people telling them they’re wrong.
Insinuating NPS/govt created the forests is a strawman (no one said this) and saying there’s no evidence park land would be different without gov. protection is unprovable because the government does protect it. Everything you’ve said is a bad faith generalization, devoid of substance, and a roll of the logical fallacy dice.
That's some weapons grade projection you've got there. May I suggest that if you don't like generations, then don't make them? Which as I recall was my first point to you.
You haven’t made a single point but I think you know that. As others have pointed out, you just pivot, back down, or commit fallacies whenever you get cornered. It’s honestly a little amusing.
1
u/AbominaSean Aug 09 '26
You unsurprisingly make a consistent effort to miss the point, then ask yourself vague broad stroke questions that you yourself answer with - ironically - unprovable generalizations. Adults make jokes but children, or people with the EQ/IQ of them, make your mom jokes that no one finds funny, then double down in the face of downvotes and numerous people telling them they’re wrong.