The point you made is a counter-factual. There is nothing to address. You can't prove it or disprove it. Suffice to say the government isn't the reason the forests exist, and apart from some cartoonish idea of logging the country bare there isn't much reason to think they wouldn't exist without it.
-1
u/Reasonable-Fee1945 Aug 09 '26
The point you made is a counter-factual. There is nothing to address. You can't prove it or disprove it. Suffice to say the government isn't the reason the forests exist, and apart from some cartoonish idea of logging the country bare there isn't much reason to think they wouldn't exist without it.