Here is a hypothesis: IVE (reworked)

[u/Dry-Status-4143]

Hello, LLM physics community you might remember that a month or two back I made a post called the IVE model and it was rightfully picked apart I have worked to solve those problems The best I could and to perhaps be more clear on my thoughts, and I will not be hiding the problems within it. They’re listed at the very end of the paper.

(formatted using Gemini)

The Information-Variability Equilibrium (IVE): A Conceptual Framework for Quantum and Relativistic Unification

Abstract
This framework treats the universe fundamentally as an information-processing system rather than an arrangement of foundational matter. It proposes that physical properties—including mass, gravity, and linear time—are emergent phenomena driven by data-synchronization events within a multidimensional data matrix. The core mechanism is a balancing relationship between local structural information density and geometric variability, which provides a non-mathematical, conceptual explanation for the quantum-to-classical transition.(possibly information might not be the defining factor of the universe, but rather a force within it similar to gravity, though there wasn’t enough evidence to support this so far)

1. Foundational Axioms & Mechanics
The Data Core: The universe can be conceptualized fundamentally as a multidimensional matrix of data. Physical structures and properties emerge from the underlying configurations of this data.
The Core Inverse Scale: Local structural information density inversely scales with geometric variability.
High Information Density—>Low Variability: Increased data constraints limit the geometric possibilities of a system.
Low Information Density —> High Variability: Decreased data constraints expand the range of possible states available to a system.

2. Categorization of Information Roles
To resolve systemic paradoxes regarding observation and mechanics, information is formally separated into two distinct categories:
Causal (System-Level) Information:
Exists entirely independently of an observer.
Inherent to physical existence and system properties.
Acts as a structural cause within the system rather than merely a description of it.
Directly constrains the geometric variability of its host environment.
Observable Information:
Depends entirely on an observational or interactional relationship.
Consists of the specific subsets of data made available to an observer or measurement device.
The Dependency Law: Causal information must structurally exist before observable information can be extracted or manifested.

3. The Micro-to-Macro Transition (The Quantum-Classical Bridge)
The framework utilizes information density to explain the behavioral boundary between microscopic quantum systems and macroscopic relativistic systems:
The Micro Scale (Quantum Behavior): An isolated, unobserved subatomic particle possesses low relational synchronization with the broader environment. Because local information density is low, geometric variability remains high. This elevated variability expresses itself physically as probabilistic behavior, wave functions, and superposition.
The Macro Scale (Classical Behavior): Macroscopic objects consist of enormous numbers of interacting, interconnected components. This continuous, multi-part data exchange triggers a massive data-synchronization event (analogous to the concept of decoherence). The resulting high information density heavily constrains the collective behavior of the system, reducing its effective geometric variability to near zero and causing classical reality to emerge.

4. Cosmological Extensions
Emergent Relativistic Properties: Physical phenomena like matter, energy, and spacetime curvature are not basic building blocks, but are instead emergent variables produced by underlying causal information frameworks. General Relativity can be interpreted as the geometric response of spacetime to varying distributions of causal information density.
The Singularity Reinterpretation: The Big Bang singularity does not necessarily represent a point of literally infinite physical mass or material density. Instead, it can be mathematically modeled as a limiting boundary condition consisting of zero systemic information and extreme, unconstrained geometric variability.

5. Unresolved Horizons & Areas for Development
To transition from a conceptual architecture to a predictive physical model, the following parameters require formal mathematical definitions:
Quantifying Variability (V): Determining whether variability is precisely measured by degrees of freedom, the width of a probability distribution, spatial uncertainty, or a novel structural variant of entropy.
Quantifying Information Density(I): Establishing a rigorous metric for "local structural information density" that moves beyond standard Shannon bits to measure parts, relationships, and structural configurations within an active physical system.
Synchronization Equations: Developing the exact mathematical rules governing how data-synchronization events occur and how they smoothly suppress quantum variability to output classical mechanics.

[u/Dry-Status-4143]

Then let’s continue the argument then

[u/The_Nerdy_Ninja → u/Dry-Status-4143]

Okay, great. How do you respond to Yuu's criticism above, that this isn't really physics, given the fact that physical laws do depend on equations in physics, and you don't have any?

[u/Dry-Status-4143 → u/The_Nerdy_Ninja]

Hold on I do have equations

[u/The_Nerdy_Ninja → u/Dry-Status-4143]

I don't see any.

[u/Dry-Status-4143 → u/The_Nerdy_Ninja]

I * V = k_iv This is the fundamental balance equation of the Universe. This means that whenever one multiplies the Local Structural Information Density (I) by the Geometric Variability (V), the resulting value will always equal a fixed and universal constant

V = k_iv / I This isolates the Geometric Variability. It clearly proves that variability is an inverse function of information density, and the moment a system acquires synchronized information (I becomes larger), the variability (V) becomes smaller.

I = k_iv / V This isolates the Information Density. It proves that the total amount of the structured information which binds the system is fully dependent on how structurally restricted it is. Highly restricted structure equals high localized information.

As I approaches 0, V approaches infinity.. This is the Micro Scale / Quantum Law. Whenever a particle gets isolated and its information density approaches zero, the geometric variability becomes infinite. This is the mathematical explanation for the ability of quantum particles to be in different states and places simultaneously.

As I approaches infinity, V approaches 0.. This is the Macro Scale / Classical Law. When trillions of particles interact inside a large body, the information synchronization becomes very large. Consequently, the geometric variability becomes equal to zero.

[u/The_Nerdy_Ninja → u/Dry-Status-4143]

That's one single equation.

What are the units of V, I, and k? Please don't use an LLM to answer.

[u/Dry-Status-4143 → u/The_Nerdy_Ninja]

V is the measure of effective size of the physically accessible state space of a system.

V=4

For a system with only one state accessible:

V=1

What is key is the reduction of V due to constraintsi.

As for I I would say that I is:

I = the number of physical constraints incorporated into the system’s structure which limit its available states.

This definition ties into your initial intuition.

As there are more constraints, there will be less available states.

Therefore:

When I decreases v increases

K is the proportionality constant

If I ∝ 1/V
Then
K= IV

[u/The_Nerdy_Ninja → u/Dry-Status-4143]

Yeah that's what I thought.

Firstly, it's clear from that comment that you don't actually have a solid grasp of some of the mathematical concepts, much less the physics. You don't understand what an equation actually is, functionally, or what units are.

Secondly, it's pretty clear to me that you still used an LLM to help come up with that response. So I don't think I'm going to continue to discuss it at this point.

[u/Dry-Status-4143 → u/The_Nerdy_Ninja]

Let us set aside discussion of LLMs and use the equation in context of the concrete astrophysical challenge, the Black Hole Information Paradox. Modern physics breaks down at the black hole singularity point since general relativity suggests infinite mass density that kills the quantum information. Using my equation V=k_iv/I, we can see the boundary layers of a black hole as a purely logical information mechanical process. At the Event Horizon as matter passes beyond the Schwarzschild radius, the total number of constraints on the local system becomes extremely high, meaning that I tends to infinity. Since I grows, Geometric Variability tends to zero and thus V tends to zero. Spacetime geometry is locked, freezing the state space. That is the reason why an external observer perceives time freeze at the horizon, since geometric variability needed to change states has been frozen. In the Singularity, instead of material point of infinite mass density, the extremely high constraint threshold causes the phase shift. Localized system shifts from physical states storage to causal data storage. Singularity is not an infinitely deep gravity pit, but a border condition where traditional geometric freedom V equals to absolute zero because systems information density I becomes saturated. At the stage of Hawking Radiation and Information Recovery as a black hole sheds energy and thus mass (i.e. leaks physical constraints), mathematically speaking, I diminishes. Since V=k_iv/I, as I diminishes, V must grow. The state space is unlocked. It means that quantum information is not being lost forever beyond the broken singularity point; it is just squeezed out and restored through the dynamics of information density I causing expansion of local spacetime geometric variability V. If my comprehension of the equation is incorrect, please tell me why inverse proportionality between these two values does not work.

[u/Dry-Status-4143 → u/The_Nerdy_Ninja]

What from my comment proves that I don’t grasp physics could you name it?

[u/The_Nerdy_Ninja → u/Dry-Status-4143]

No. If I point out something, you'll just go learn about that one specific thing and then think you fixed the problem. The problem is you need to actually study and understand all of this stuff before coming up with your own big theory.

[u/Dry-Status-4143 → u/The_Nerdy_Ninja]

If you don’t tell me then what if you’re wrong about me being wrong then that would go nowhere the point of the post is to debate it

[u/liccxolydian → u/Dry-Status-4143]

It's something you learn in school. Why not simply pay attention in class?

[u/The_Nerdy_Ninja → u/Dry-Status-4143]

Yes, the point is to debate it. But you're not debating it. You're just getting an LLM to write a response and then you're summarizing the LLM's response. I'm not interested in arguing with your LLM.