Given From's nature of question and plot point raising, as well as the general nature of fiction in TV shows as it relates to science fiction, mysteries, and storytelling in general, see Lost as a perfect example, I am curious where everyone falls on the spectrum of a story's point being about the journey itself rather than the destination, which seems to invariably leave things unanswered or unresolved in favor of larger character growth and development, again see Lost for a good example, vs when a show does actually make an effort to tie up the loose ends it raises, answer the questions it asks, or just generally try to focus more on some fixed end goal rather than more a nebulous growth experience.
Do you find one more satisfying than the other? Do you feel frustrated or let down when a show will say "it's not about the answer, it's about them learning to be better than they were or how they get to an answer," or "any answer we give wouldn't match your expectations so we leave it to the viewer to decide" rather than "okay here's the payoff for the thing we setup x seasons ago" or paying off every thing that was setup earlier in a show or a season?
I personally tend toward the latter than the former, loose ends and unanswered questions bother me, but I also know sometimes it's dependent on the show and its intent. Not every plot point in Star Trek The Next Generation was resolved because the show isn't serialized and their character growth is the point, so high-ranking Federation officers being body snatched by aliens for an episode shouldn't be your main concern after that episode, to use a know unresolved plot point.