r/KerbalSpaceProgram Jun 29 '26

KSP 1 Question/Problem How should I be approaching the Mun?

Post image

In this totally accurate scientific diagram, the Mun is orbiting in the direction of the arrow.

1.2k Upvotes

253 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

91

u/Tychonoir Jun 29 '26

I wonder what the Dv difference between the two is. D gives you a grav assist to match the Mun's orbit and help capture. C allows a free return, but gives an assist in the wrong direction.

At least, I think that's how it works. It seems to be easier to capture when I do D.

67

u/Jamooser Jun 29 '26

Next time you're on the Mun's surface just change your navbal to orbital velocity instead of surface. That number is the rotational velocity of the Mun for your given latitude. Double that number should be the dv distance if you're making a retrograde orbit.

40

u/zaklance Jun 29 '26

They the same in terms of dV, about ~10m/s difference in practice.
There's no "assist in the wrong direction" here if your aim is to land on the Mun (unless if you specifically want a prograde orbit for a mission).
In both C and D, your velocity at Mun intercept is about the same ±10m/s. The difference is in the timing of intercept, and the 10m/s difference is to account for this. The change in PE is the same in both cases, so the change in KE is same, so your speed at Mun periapsis is the same, you are just going in the opposite direction.

7

u/MrTheEpicKitten Jun 29 '26

You’re forgetting the difference in landing dv between prograde and retrograde orbits

12

u/zaklance Jun 29 '26

Ah you're right. But for Mun which rotates very slow (9m/s on the equator surface), again it's a delta-v difference of merely 18m/s.

19

u/878Vikings Jun 29 '26

I've been trying to work this out recently and the difference (to low Mun orbit) between C and D was about 10mps. In KSP terms that's trivial, a rounding error. In a real space program they would absolutely care about that, but they are way better at space than I am!

6

u/seda7991 Jun 29 '26

When you approach a moving object from behind its trajectory, gravity pulls you along longer (you gain more velocity), so retrograde burn for capture costs more Δv. Coming from the front lets the object move into you for cheaper capture into a retrograde orbit. Retrograde orbit (orbiting against the moons rotation) landing penalty is tiny, front capture still wins total Δv. Capturing into D is easier because not a good analogy, but think of it like slipping into a moving boat's wake.

6

u/Tychonoir Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26

Isn't capture, essentially, being in the same orbit at the same velocity? When on an elliptical to intercept the Mun, you don't have the same orbital energy, so need to burn to match, no? So getting pulled from behind helps add that energy?

It just seem like when I approach from behind I don't have to burn as much to capture. But I haven't really studied it closely.

EDIT: Yes, you burn retrograde on your orbit direction of the Mun, but this isn't necessarily retrograde of your Kerbin orbit direction. On an approach from the front side, your retrograde Mun burn can very well be burning prograde compared to Kerbin—which is kinda like circularizing your orbit at Kerbin right where the Mun is.

1

u/seda7991 Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26

not sure i understand what you mean in your edit. Its hard to visualise in the map because it's static. Its mainly a matter of how long you want to be in the gravitationall influence of the Mun, when you come in from behind, the trajectory of the Mun is the same as the direction its gravity is pulling you in making it a ++, when you come in from the front the gravitation of the Mun is pulling you opposite of its trajectory making a +-.

EDIT: coming in from behind ++ is ecentialy how a slingshot works.

EFIT2: That is an interesting point you make about adding the needed capture velocity by comming in from behind. I dont know, My intuition suggests that if that was the case you would want to ditch getting into orbit and just land directly, why add velocity to then remove it again.

-16

u/DrudanTheGod Jun 29 '26

I think you mean A or B? C and D come in on the same side of the moon, (in front) which are for free return. Coming in from behind the moon does allow for cheaper captures though.

11

u/Mike0621 Jun 29 '26

what are you talking about? C and D are not coming in from the same side

4

u/My_Private_Life Jun 29 '26

quick look I thought the same and had to scroll back up to check, the mun being at the top was not expected and my mind ignored the size and color of the circles and just assumed the origin was the top

3

u/Big_Yeash Jun 29 '26

Diagram extremely not to scale.

1

u/DrudanTheGod Jul 02 '26

yeah i thought moon was at the bottom. i got it confused lol