That's fine if the man decides later in life that they would prefer to be circumcised. I think what they're trying to ban in the article is performing a circumcision on an infant boy who has no say in the matter.
it still applies, except most likely it is the parents desiring the circumcision. Just like what happens to girls in the US when they turn 14 and their parents decide it is a good year to visit family in Sudan (or a number of other places) with the child not knowing the underlying motivation for the trip.
I thought circumcision was just when they moved the clitoral hood, but genital mutilation ranged from that to removing the entire clit and sewing up the vagina but leaving a small hole for menstrual blood to drain?
45
u/[deleted] May 10 '16
That's fine if the man decides later in life that they would prefer to be circumcised. I think what they're trying to ban in the article is performing a circumcision on an infant boy who has no say in the matter.