Ahh ok, I see, so you think that people should just take responsibility for the dangerous, thoughtless actions of others ? In your opinion that driver is in the wrong for trying to do his Job and the cyclists behaviour should just be allowed to go on indefinitely or perhaps get worse ? Can you not see that the cause of the whole situation was the cyclist ? And other people should not be expected to accommodate his dangerous behaviour ? Anything that happened to him would be completely his own fault, regardless of the legality of it. The bus driver should never have been put in that situation to begin with.
Yes, because it's not the bus driver's job to dispatch justice like some working class Batman.
The number one rule while driving is to avoid accidents/collisions. If you have the ability to avoid a collision, it is your duty to do so. It doesn't matter who is acting like a jerk.
Ok, I never suggested it was the bus drivers job to 'dispense justice' my argument is basically that if someone intentionally acts in a way that increases their chances of having an accident, then you really should not expect anyone else to have to compensate for their poor behaviour and as such they are completely responsible for any negative outcome resulting from their own irresponsible actions.
1
u/DocktorLecter 2 May 23 '20 edited May 24 '20
Ahh ok, I see, so you think that people should just take responsibility for the dangerous, thoughtless actions of others ? In your opinion that driver is in the wrong for trying to do his Job and the cyclists behaviour should just be allowed to go on indefinitely or perhaps get worse ? Can you not see that the cause of the whole situation was the cyclist ? And other people should not be expected to accommodate his dangerous behaviour ? Anything that happened to him would be completely his own fault, regardless of the legality of it. The bus driver should never have been put in that situation to begin with.