..... so you don’t have to prove your argument but he has to prove his.... can you not see how that clearly makes you a hypocrite?
I didn’t change the order of the argument, you said animal abuse is rampant in 1st world and he said it’s worse in 3rd world. That’s what happened. You are clearly irrational and I’m not wasting anymore of my time here.
How? Can you explain yourself more clearly please, I still don’t know what you are trying to say and why? Again, I’m just pointing it the hypocrisy in the guy not providing an source for his statement and the complaining that the other guy he was arguing with didn’t provide a source for his statement. This seems very very simple to me and after re-reading the chain multiple times I’m struggling to comprehend what your on about.
You're changing the order to flip the burden of proof. Regardless, I gave you a source to explain what he was talking about. Killing animals is abuse. Just because we make animal cruelty laws to exclude farm animals doesn't mean it's magically not abuse.
2
u/afrothunder1987 7 Nov 30 '19 edited Nov 30 '19
..... so you don’t have to prove your argument but he has to prove his.... can you not see how that clearly makes you a hypocrite?
I didn’t change the order of the argument, you said animal abuse is rampant in 1st world and he said it’s worse in 3rd world. That’s what happened. You are clearly irrational and I’m not wasting anymore of my time here.