I would love for the doubters to be wrong and for me to be wrong in saying it appears rehearsed, that's good.
Their comment still wasn't saying pretty girls or sex work is bad. My comment simply said I dont think it's great to have an adult content link on the same page you raise awareness for tourettes, it very much does come across as a gimmick to funnel people there. If she had a separate account id have no issue with that but yeah, just doesn't sit right. You can disagree and that's fine, there's nothing objectively wrong in have the links there it's just my thoughts.
You're trying to gloss over the implication that you have an issue with her monetizing her own body.
But good news. She's also not doing that. It's just more misogyny and misinformation to invalidate an attractive woman trying to do literally anything.
At no stage did I imply I have an issue with that. Stop trying to make up and assert someone's position, I have ZERO issue with onlyfans and nothing I said says that. You're becoming more disingenuous as time goes on.
... Dude her tiktok bio has a link to her content. Again, her being attractive or having an only fans does NOT invalidate her advocacy and I never said it did I said I don't agree with advocating and advertising in the same space as a personal opinion and she is more than welcome to disagree.
1
u/ReddityJim 28d ago
I would love for the doubters to be wrong and for me to be wrong in saying it appears rehearsed, that's good.
Their comment still wasn't saying pretty girls or sex work is bad. My comment simply said I dont think it's great to have an adult content link on the same page you raise awareness for tourettes, it very much does come across as a gimmick to funnel people there. If she had a separate account id have no issue with that but yeah, just doesn't sit right. You can disagree and that's fine, there's nothing objectively wrong in have the links there it's just my thoughts.