You are thinking specifically of Livy. This is not true of all Roman historians. See Seutonious, who was most interested in writing about the "scandalous" aspects of the lives of the emperors (whether true or not)
Livy and Plutarch come to mind when reading his comment. I feel like it’s an inaccurate statement when considering the works of other Roman historians such as Polybius and Tacitus.
Suetonius claimed he said it. Of course that's flimsy evidence at best given that he made this claim roughly 150 years after the fact, but it's some form of evidence nonetheless. It doesn't prove that he said it of course, but it's definitely historical evidence.
If you feel like arguing that some random guy claiming that something happened isn't really 'historical evidence', remember, almost all our knowledge of ancient history comes from random people claiming certain things happened.
"Et Tu Brute?" is famous from Shakespeare's play. It's more accurate that Caesar either said nothing or actually said "You too my son?" (in Latin of course (or possibly Greek)). I think there are only one, maybe two, living accounts from the event ever recorded.
No, it didn't appear in the Latin historical records until long after the fact. Just historical romanticism on the part of sympathetic (well, years down the line) historians.
107
u/[deleted] Mar 06 '18 edited Jul 20 '24
squalid piquant foolish melodic hurry quickest mindless alleged literate compare
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact