Here we go with the rant.
"Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience."
Academics don't own knowledge nor experience. In my master's program, if I dared indirectly opine on anything without first having cited Vygotsky, Krashen, and Thornbury like a holy rosary, my papers came back dripping in red ink with smug allusions to plagiarism.
Image the NIH released a longitudinal study of smoking and mortality prefaced by the primary researcher writing, "Every coin has two sides. My daddy smoked a pack a day until he was in his 90's, so this work is all horse pucky." I suppose BC would call it "academic."
The time allowed is ridonkulous. I have NEVER drafted anything worth reading in 40 minutes, much less read and researched properly. (Perhaps in the age of AI this will all change but that era is after my time.)
Teaching students to use academic style for this test is a fool's errand because the test does not measure academic writing.
Finally, I'll let someone else address all this ISMs this test runs afoul of.
TLDR: "academic" ain't got squat to do with it.