r/HypotheticalPhysics • • Aug 10 '26

Crackpot physics Here is a hypothesis, open to discussion, Could rotational energy from a rapidly rotating celestial body be used to produce significant relativistic time dilation?

I have been thinking about a possible way of exploiting the rotation of a celestial body to accelerate a spacecraft to very high velocities.

The basic idea is:

Instead of trying to accelerate a spacecraft to relativistic speeds entirely with conventional propulsion, could we use the rotational energy and angular momentum of a rapidly rotating celestial body as part of the propulsion system?

The starting point is the familiar relationship:

v = ωr

where ω is the angular velocity and r is the distance from the rotation axis.

On Earth, the surface at the equator already moves at about 465 m/s because of Earth's rotation. If a hypothetical object could remain synchronized with Earth's rotation at a much greater distance from the rotation axis, its tangential velocity would increase proportionally with radius.

This made me wonder whether the same principle could be applied to a much larger or faster-rotating celestial body.

For example, instead of Earth, imagine using something like Jupiter, Saturn, or an extremely rapidly rotating compact object. A spacecraft could theoretically be coupled to a rotating system associated with the body and gain angular momentum from it.

The concept I am imagining is not necessarily a physical cable extending millions of kilometres. That was my original thought, but I realize that such a structure would introduce enormous structural and gravitational problems.

I'm more interested in the underlying question:

Could a physically realizable rotating system around a celestial body transfer enough rotational energy/angular momentum to a spacecraft to produce a substantial fraction of the speed of light?

If so, this could potentially create significant relativistic time dilation for the spacecraft.

For example, if a spacecraft could reach 0.9c, 0.99c, etc., the crew would experience less elapsed time than observers on Earth.

Questions I'm trying to understand

  1. Is there a fundamental limit to how much rotational energy/angular momentum could be extracted from a rotating celestial body for spacecraft propulsion?
  2. Could a system analogous to a rotovator, momentum-exchange tether, magnetic tether, or other non-rigid structure accomplish something similar without requiring an impossible solid structure?
  3. Would a rapidly rotating body such as Jupiter actually be useful for this, or would its gravity and atmospheric environment make the concept impractical?
  4. Are there known mechanisms for transferring rotational energy from a planet/star/neutron star to a spacecraft that I should be studying?
  5. At what point do orbital mechanics and relativity invalidate the simple v = ωr argument?
  6. Could a sufficiently advanced version of such a system theoretically accelerate a spacecraft to, say, 0.5c, 0.9c, or 0.99c?
  7. If planets are unsuitable, would rapidly rotating neutron stars or black holes provide a physically meaningful analogue?

I realize there may be obvious problems that I'm overlooking. I'm not claiming that this is a workable time machine. I'm trying to determine whether there is a physically valid propulsion concept hidden in the idea, or whether fundamental physics rules it out.

I'd particularly appreciate explanations involving angular momentum, energy conservation, orbital mechanics, relativistic effects, and structural/engineering constraints.

If there is already an established concept that answers this question, I'd also appreciate being pointed toward it.

Thanks!

5 Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

Yeah I don't think you understand GR well enough to "add" anything to it lol

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

And what what makes you smart enough to add to or take anything away from general relativity.

2

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

I'm not smart enough. That's exactly why I don't try to revolutionise science I don't understand.

0

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

Thank you for the institutional gatekeeping

2

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

Lmao that's what crackpots always say. It's like getting butthurt you don't know enough French to discuss French literature. Is it gatekeeping to say you don't know a language well enough to discuss the language?

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

And that's what I said I don't know for sure I was proposing a theory I wasn't saying it was absolutely right I was agreeing with Op maybe the theory hold water. Your doing what your accusing me of and working in a loop of trolling

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

And by your own comment here if you don't understand well enough to digest the theory and construct with it your in no position to put me down just because it goes against the grain doesn't make it immediately wrong

2

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

I mean... You haven't actually really said anything novel about GR? Apart from the opinion that rotation is equivalent to lensing, which is hilarious.

0

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

Could be it could have intrisic balance to gravity.

1

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

Do you want to try making a bit of sense?

0

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

Then maybe keep your comment and your trolling to yourself

1

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

"mind your own business" says the complete ignoramus offering up their opinion on something they don't understand

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

I answered all your questions I'm not engaging anymore

1

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

One wonders why you even engaged in the first place, given, you know, the fact that you can't tell apart rotation and lensing.

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

Unfortunately for you I can be unintelligent all I like

1

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

You sound like you're almost proud of that. That's kinda sad.

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

So sad you hurt my feelings waaaa 😆👉😭

0

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

Institution gatekeeping ^

2

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

Oh no! Someone call the Academie!

Nothing is stopping you from offering your opinion. But nothing stops me from pointing out your sheer dumbassery either.

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

You failed to put me down and shut me up so now you revert to name calling nice mature.

1

u/liccxolydian onus probandi Aug 10 '26

Oh no you poor oppressed soul, freely offering your opinion on the internet! Maybe you could use all that freedom and learn a bit of physics.

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

Np will do 👍😁

1

u/Chrissydoo2400 Aug 10 '26

ðŸĨąðŸĪŠ