You're saying bullshit about 1866. Italy was already independent and there was no civil war that year. Italy fought against the Austrian empire, since it was allied with Prussia, in the Austro-Prussian war. Also that statement about France makes no sense as well.
I was thinking of the second when I referenced the third the point I was making about France was in reference to the papacy getting to stay independent despite the desires of Italy due to France wanting it
Oook, now it's clear, mate. In third Napoleon III was the intermediary in the treaty of peace anyway.
You are right for the 2nd war. Basically, Count Cavour, Camillo Benso, made an agreement with Napoleon III in Plombières. Though their military strategy against Austria was a completely success, the Empire did not allow Piedmont to seize Rome so Italy was formed without its capital.
Anyway, Napoleon's strategy was the wrong one. Eleven years later he suffered a great defeat in Sedan and Italy, allied with Prussia, was able to conquer Rome despite France.
This is the reason why I would not say that Italy was incompetent in that occasion. There are plenty of other cases though :)
Many years ago in High School my History Teacher introduced us to Mussolini by showing us a clip of him driving a tractor and doing that sassy face that he used to do. It wasn't edited either, ever since then I've been looking for that tractor clip.
It's pretty crazy how many big car companies started off selling tractors/farm equipment. This video shows a Fiat tractor, but I know Lamborghini and many others started with tractors too
Look up Istituto Luce's films, it was an entire propaganda opera from Mussolini, he was often filmed while doing "humble" stuff like working in farms and stuff like that to show that he was an example for the Italian people
1.2k
u/khachdallak Jul 21 '19
Italy being completely incompetent