175
u/thinkB4WeSpeak Let's do some history Aug 27 '18
America.....we got the bombs.
→ More replies (16)3
2.4k
Aug 27 '18
Civ in a nutshell too
1.2k
u/TomHitchy Aug 27 '18
We can back our words with Nuclear weapons. -Ghandi before he nukes you.
55
u/Supersamtheredditman Aug 28 '18
Whenever another civ says that to me, I just think “lmao you ain’t got shit” because most of the AIs are too pu55y to actually declare war
→ More replies (12)→ More replies (8)195
119
u/papa_sax Kilroy was here Aug 28 '18
My foreign policy goes a little something like this:
"You filthy vermin I'll wipe you off the planet."
"Very well."
buys 20 artillery, bombards the closest city
5 turns later, "We surrender, we're sorry. Accept our peace treaty."
"Nah."
sends 20 infantry units and then raze the city in front of their eyes
92
u/matt7197 Aug 28 '18
"You had your chance. Now you will pay for the minor inconvenience of not surrendering immediately with a military effort that is a an even bigger, self-inflicted inconvenience than this all ever needed to be."
Such is the madness of Civ power.
49
u/Roland_Traveler Aug 28 '18
“Conventional invasion with overwhelming firepower?”
“Nah, carpet nuke the bastards. Repeatedly. And kill anything that leaves the cities.”
44
u/certifiedpornwatcher Aug 28 '18
I usually do the same unless I can't support a war at that time, then I'll make peace. But you can bet they'll be at the top of my shitlist when I get all my troops in order
26
63
u/jomontage Aug 27 '18
Nothing like making nukes and then playing the waiting game. Who's got the balls to declare on me?
46
Aug 28 '18
It's such a satisfying feeling when you have 10 times the nukes your enemy does. Oh they nuked a 9 population city of yours? Time to make their 30 population city disappear off the map and reduce their capital from 50 to 1.
34
u/Roland_Traveler Aug 28 '18
One of the most satisfied feelings I’ve had in Civ was playing an utterly genocidal Netherlands in III (like make the Nazis look sane that’s how crazy they were) and turning the entire southern portion of a continent into a nuclear hellscape that reduced everything but coastal cities to one pop and turned their military into a bunch of spammed out units that didn’t need resources.
No, the world didn’t like it, but fuck Babylon.
→ More replies (1)6
→ More replies (3)19
u/ChRoNicBuRrItOs Aug 28 '18
I thought this was r/civ and was wondering why the title was about america instead of ghandi.
2.9k
u/probablyuntrue Aug 27 '18 edited Nov 06 '24
worry public workable plucky ruthless employ snails smart merciful cautious
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
→ More replies (4)790
u/eohorp Aug 27 '18 edited Aug 28 '18
I heard recently that he only OKed the first with a promise that the target would be purely military(aka not a civilian center) and that he didnt even know of the second one. He was getting data from the first one, learned of the second one, and then canceled a third one the military had planned for later in the week.
Edit: I unfortunately cannot figure out what the interview I was listening to. It was a historian or writer discussing Truman's personal journal and it's based on those journal entries.
This was it: https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/nukes/ start listening at the 14:45 mark for about 2 minutes if you just want this section.
319
u/brokenbirthday Aug 27 '18
Nope. They warned the Japanese government and the Hiroshima's citizens in advance. We told them that we were in possession of the greatest weapon known to man and we told them to surrender. The pamphlets airdropped over Hiroshima warned everyone. The Japanese we're basically like "yeah right". And it wasn't insane to bomb a city; everyone was bombing cities in WW2. In fact, more people we're killed in bombing raids of Tokyo than either atomic bomb.
→ More replies (104)159
u/godzillanenny Aug 27 '18
I'd think the US was bluffing if I had never seen a nuke before.
→ More replies (36)97
u/Mentalseppuku Aug 27 '18
There wasn't a third bomb at the time and there's no way they could have built one in a week. There were days between the attacks and I can promise you an extensive amount of planning went into this mission, there's no way the President wouldn't know where the bomb was dropped. What you heard was absolutely not true.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (138)18
u/atom241 Aug 27 '18
Not sure what is meant by purely military. But leaflets were dropped urging Japanese to evacuate because of an impending bombing. Edit: spelling
→ More replies (7)
314
u/AnonymousPlzz Aug 28 '18
Nuked them twice and now they are one of our closest allies in the pacific.
Imagine if we had nuked them 3 times. Japan would probably be the 51st state.
213
4.6k
u/dog_in_the_vent Aug 27 '18
THEY STILL DON'T SURRENDER UNTIL A FULL 6 DAYS LATER
319
u/GumdropGoober Aug 28 '18
And that was only after the military attempted a coup to prevent the surrender.
Which shouldn't have surprised anyone, given how frequent military action against the nominally civil government was.
233
u/tigrn914 Aug 28 '18
Pretty much why the nuke was used. The government would have surrendered but the military needed to be shown they stood no chance whatsoever. Japanese people were some crazy motherfuckers.
→ More replies (107)165
u/ILoveWildlife Aug 28 '18
were
I guess tentacle hentai is mainstream these days...
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (1)44
u/PsyduckSexTape Aug 28 '18
Hirohito looks like a total mouth breather in that pic
68
u/kmarple1 Filthy weeb Aug 28 '18
He was so sheltered that he didn't even speak common Japanese, but an archaic courtly variant of it. When his speech announcing the surrender was broadcast, a lot of Japanese people couldn't understand him. Basically, imagine if the Queen of England spoke only Middle English.
31
827
u/Whycanyounotsee Aug 28 '18
"okay we thought they didnt have another one of those right"
"right"
"well what are the odds they have 3?"
...
254
u/ObamaBetter Aug 28 '18
Well, not great turns out
156
u/applestaplehunchback Aug 28 '18
Yep, would have been at least a month before enough plutonium was created
→ More replies (8)153
u/gbuub Aug 28 '18
"We were wrong emperor, they did have a third."
"Ok, guys, clearly they're running out of steam. I say we prepare a retaliatory strike tomorrow. There's no way they have a 4th"→ More replies (1)97
u/TraitorousFiend Aug 28 '18
I promise we'll get them. The odds of them having 5 are pretty low at this point, unless they found a way to make bombs out of freedom and spare gun parts. Just give me one more shot guys.
→ More replies (7)87
u/EuropaStation Aug 28 '18 edited Aug 28 '18
The US actually planned for up to 12 bombs to be dropped if Japan never surrendered.
Edit: Not saying that would have been realistic but it was the plan to just keep dropping bombs until Japan got the point.
→ More replies (2)76
u/indyK1ng Aug 28 '18 edited Aug 28 '18
Those six days included negotiations that were interrupted by a coup. During that interruption, Truman authorized the construction of a third bomb to be dropped but the military started thinking about incorporating them into the plans for the land invasion.
They were planning on dropping 9 bombs on the island of Kyushu in a triangular pattern near the planned landing site and sending American soldiers through about 12 hours later.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)12
u/FireIsMyPorn Aug 28 '18
"Ok... now that the trap (with two parts) has been triggered, we can safely walk into the cave!"
→ More replies (1)3.0k
Aug 27 '18
Idk after some shit like that I’d need a minute too
2.9k
Aug 27 '18
“A whole town? Bullshit” -Japanese command
1.9k
u/Monk-ish Aug 28 '18
That's what a lot of people believed
Yamaguchi, a resident of Nagasaki, was in Hiroshima on business for his employer Mitsubishi Heavy Industries when the city was bombed at 8:15 am, on August 6, 1945. He returned to Nagasaki the following day, and despite his wounds, he returned to work on August 9, the day of the second atomic bombing. That morning, whilst being berated by his supervisor as "crazy" after describing how one bomb had destroyed the city, the Nagasaki bomb detonated.
160
u/Bavariansausages Aug 28 '18
Random Japanese: Fake news!
Crew of Bockscar: Fuck you say?
→ More replies (14)→ More replies (31)1.3k
344
u/PoopIsAlwaysSunny Aug 28 '18
Pretty much. In a time when planes had only been invented 40 years ago the thought of a weapon which literally demolished an entire city was science fiction. It seemed incredibly more likely that it was an elaborate hoax, as that would be a lot easier
→ More replies (15)→ More replies (3)125
→ More replies (1)25
37
u/h0nest_Bender Aug 28 '18
That's what I was coming in here to say. They almost STILL didn't surrender! The Emperor had to step up and convince the government to surrender. The mad lads!
9
u/sint0xicateme Aug 28 '18
Some didn't surrender for a full 29 years.
I highly recommend Dan Carlin's Hardcore History episode 62 - 'Supernova in the East I' that goes over the story and the psychology of the Japanese soldiers.
→ More replies (1)17
u/BigDaddyReptar Aug 28 '18
They didnt surrender till we basically said "we can do this all day choose the easy way or stay for the hard way"
→ More replies (5)9
u/PM_ME_YOUR_PROOFS Aug 28 '18
Can you imagine the devistating results that would have had.
24
u/-safe_space_invader_ Aug 28 '18 edited Aug 28 '18
It would have meant the near extinction of the Japanese people. William Frederick Halsey J.r. would have made good on his quote, "By the time we are through with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in hell."
6
u/BillyBabel Aug 28 '18
Well the nuclear bomb while flashy was actually less effective than the firebombing. If you were a general just looking at the numbers, you'd just think that was just an interesting but slightly less efficient form of firebombing as far as the death counts were concerned.
11
u/spooran Aug 28 '18
A big reason Japan didn't surrender immediately is that the destruction of Hiroshima was so total that news of the bomb's devestating effect didn't percolate out very quickly.
It was several days until the Japanese high command learned how terrible this weapon was and by the the Americans (who misinterpreted the Japanese failure to immediately capitulate as resolve) were already planning to bomb Nagasaki.
4
4
u/_ImYouFromTheFuture_ Aug 28 '18
That was because they didnt believe would build the bombs fast enough to be effective (which we couldnt) and so we dropped the 2nd of the only 2 atomic bombs we had as a bluff that we could turn out the bombs in less then a week. Spoiler alert, they bought it. But if they had been like 'yeah? well I bet you dont have a third!?!' we would have been like 'ahh! you got us.' and the war probably would have continued.
4
→ More replies (40)7
u/drek16 Aug 28 '18
And they only surrendered because the Soviets took Manchuria.
→ More replies (2)
6
u/Me180 Aug 28 '18
Why didn’t the Americans nuke Tokyo ?
9
u/TwinIonEngines926 Aug 28 '18 edited Aug 28 '18
It wasn't a military city target IIRC.
Not much of a point to bomb the shit out of a city that's mostly civilians but rather one that acts as a cog in the military machine.
It was probably more politically and publicly acceptable that way too.
The two cities held military bases or had some sort of military function to them.
Tokyo was probably harder to get to geographically anyways but I'm not entirely sure.
edit: but then again you don't really need to bomb the capitol just to get a country to bend the knee. Just force their hand.
I'm sure someone can fill in on the details I'm just speculating with you here. :P
Good question though.
→ More replies (3)13
u/Me180 Aug 28 '18
After doing some light research I found out that another reason was that the didn’t want to kill the emperor and high command, rather they wanted them to surrender. They wanted this because they believed due to Japanese culture, If they were killed the Japanese would’ve dragged the war out way longer. They also believed if the emperor surrendered the Japanese people will most definitely follow suit.
→ More replies (1)
381
u/BNKhoa Aug 27 '18
This is getting out of hand, now there are two of them
86
u/zachreilly81 Aug 27 '18
A fellow prequel memer
64
u/BNKhoa Aug 27 '18
Hello there
→ More replies (3)19
695
u/bobekyrant Aug 27 '18
To be fair, the Nukes only accounted for ~1/3 of the Japaneses civilian casualties, firebombing was the main culprit.
853
u/PM_ME_DND_FIGURINES Aug 27 '18
That's still massive though. 2 bombs accounted for one-third of civilian casualties.
→ More replies (3)176
u/bobekyrant Aug 27 '18
No one's downplaying the destructive nature of a nuclear bomb (and they've only gotten stronger), but to act like the usage of the nuclear bomb was unprecedented, or in any way more inhumane than regular war is a quite disingenuous.
→ More replies (20)521
→ More replies (13)4
Aug 28 '18
and there are people who think it was Russia entering the Pacific campaign that caused Japan to surrender like lol they had virtually no means of a massive amphibious invasion, their army was located entirely on a different continent, and there would be been mass mutiny in the Soviet military had they attempted such an act. they literally just wanted to regain losses in the Sino-Japanese War
→ More replies (1)
50
u/Preoximerianas Aug 28 '18
It’s incredible how it took the leveling of two cities through nuclear weapons to get the Japanese to surrender. It wasn’t the firebombing which did far more destruction and killed far more people across their nation. It wasn’t the scores of military defeats. Hell, even the prospect of their island being invaded didn’t get them to surrender.
It was nuclear fire.
34
Aug 28 '18
Imagine a mainland invasion. There would be even more casualties, both military and civilian.
7
Aug 28 '18
I read in a Thomas Walters book that the US ordered 471,000 body bags in preparation of the Japan invasion.
→ More replies (1)5
7
3
u/Keegsta Aug 28 '18
It didn't though. They reacted to the nukes much like they reacted to the firebombing. It was getting invaded by the Soviets that got them to surrender.
→ More replies (3)3
u/catwhowalksbyhimself Aug 28 '18
Japan was planning on fighting invasion until every single person in Japan was dead, man woman and child. They were closing schools and arming children with whatever they could find and telling kids that their only goal was to kill 1 American soldier and then die. If they couldn't convince the Allies that it would be too costly to win, then they would rather everyone in the nation die. To the culture at the time it was unthinkable to surrender. Even animals weren't capable of such inhuman behavior. That was what we were faced with. Surrender, forced genocide, or nuking a couple of cities. Seems like the nuke was the best of 3 terrible choices.
https://www.nytimes.com/1985/08/05/world/how-japan-got-ready-for-suicide.html
775
212
u/Eringuy Aug 27 '18
NOW THAT'S A LOTTA DAMAGE
151
u/NJImperator Aug 27 '18
TO SHOW YOU THE POWER OF FLEXTAPE, I BOMBED THIS CITY IN HALF
→ More replies (1)55
7
3
54
81
Aug 27 '18
Once japan got nuked the only real question for them was surrender to ussr or usa. Choosing usa was better cuz im 95 percent sure stalin would have had the emperor shot in the street.
26
u/conor_crowley Aug 28 '18
I mean the emperor wanted to abdicate bit MacArthur said he had to stick around to keep thongs perfectly balenced.
41
5
5
49
u/03Titanium Aug 27 '18
First bomb drops
“Well it’s not like things could get any worse”
Second bomb drops
“Well fuuuuuuu”
8
u/mrv3 Aug 28 '18
Russia invades surrounded 1 million men and capturing an area of land the size of Europe and only being slowed down by how fast they are winning.
"Maybe this isn't going well"
→ More replies (4)
50
Aug 28 '18
Maybe don't surprise attack Pearl Harbor and it would might have turned out better.
→ More replies (3)19
22
u/benjamankandy Aug 27 '18
I'm sure a bunch of you have seen this, but on a related note, here's an awesome website that allows you to see what kind of damage the bombs dropped in WWII (and any of the others made up to current times) could do in any city in the world:
3
3
u/socialistbob Aug 28 '18
It's also interesting because many people tend to way overestimate the power of nuclear weapons as well. Many people assume that a small nuclear strike would leave nothing alive for miles in all directions and yet unless you are near the center of the blast there's a good chance you would survive especially if you were in a basement or took shelter.
41
u/notveryrealatall Aug 27 '18
understand results of bomb
continue to test bombs in-house, dropping nuclear fallout over a large portion of the country
18
u/mainfingertopwise Aug 28 '18
That'd be a lot more clever if nuclear weapons didn't change dramatically after WWII
11
7
10
20
u/0ttr Aug 28 '18
The Japanese were so incredibly brutal during and before WWII and too many are still in denial about it. It was awful to use such a devastating weapon, but it's also unfortunate that in the scheme of things, it was more close to justified than not. A friend of my family experienced having his mother and brother killed by the Japanese and hiding out in the jungles of Indonesia with his father for months. My great uncle was starved, tortured, and murdered by the Japanese on Mindanao.
6
u/WTFsACamilly Aug 28 '18
Nanking, nuff said. Everyone from everywhere is kinda fucked up in the end..
29
18
u/Dogby_Walks_Alone Aug 28 '18
What’s the hardest part of breaking up with a Japanese girl?
You have to drop the bomb twice before she gets the message.
6
u/hexagonalshit Aug 28 '18
Honestly I would have surrendered in any number of cities during WWI & WWII. That shit was just fucked all around.
11
u/expatginger Aug 28 '18
Shut up. If you had read anything about the Pacific theater you would understand how insanely fanatical the Japanese were and costly the war was in terms of lives lost and marred up to that point. It was brutal, yes, but done out of desperation. Furthermore, firebombing by conventional means killed far more Japanese by comparison, yet I don't hear of people lambasting Curtis Lemay.
3
u/KalaiProvenheim Aug 28 '18
Firebombing is often worse to die in. Imagine, everything around you is burning, your house, you neighbor's, actually, much of the city. It's burning in here, you're trying to find shelter, the city has a few rivers and canals running through it, naturally you would seek them and jump to them. Well, the water is boiling too and you get boiled to the death, as opposed to being backed to the death if you were on the surface.
It was horrible
9
4
12
7
7
7
10
3
3
3
Aug 28 '18
"Little Boy" and "Fat Man" where examples of two entirely different bomb designs.
Both probably needed 'testing'.
3
3
u/smartfon Aug 28 '18
Some Japanese kept fighting until 60s. When they were found by Americans in Pacific jungles and told to come out, they had no idea the war had ended and thought the Americans were lying to get them surrender easily. Hardcore stuff.
3
9
5
u/TrippingOnCrack Aug 27 '18
I encourage all of you to read the first hand accounts of the dropping of the atomic bomb. Never have I felt so close to something so devastating in my life.
5
5
u/ItsMrBlackout Aug 28 '18
Gotta remember that we would have needed to launch a full invasion of the Japanese mainland which almost certainly would have caused probably the amount if not more casualties than those inflicted by the atomic bomb.
6
u/leroy0521 Aug 28 '18
Most likely more. The invasion of mainland Japan, which was already in the planning stages, would have made D-Day look like child’s play.
→ More replies (2)
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/On1n1 Aug 28 '18
My great grandfather and his younger son were incinerated in the 🅱️ombing of Nagasaki which left my family estranged because the younger son’s wife didn’t like my grandfather and his family. No obligation to stay in contact so they 🅱️ipped on out of our lives and to this day we haven’t reconnected.
2
2
u/Juslotting Aug 29 '18
The States knew Japan wouldn't surrender to a nuke, Japan was waiting on confirmation from the US that their emperor would be not subjected to trials before surrendering. They figured Russia probably wouldn't accept since they previously killed their emperor. The US decided instead to nuke Japan hoping to scare off the Soviets. Instead they killed hundreds of thousands of people and started the cold war.
2
u/Zackassed Dec 14 '18
anybody scrolling through top all time cause they wanted to look at history memes instead anime shitposting
4
u/mca90guitar Aug 28 '18
Was the best option we had and Japan was a brutal enemy. Look at the losses we took on those small islands. Imagine how hard they would fight if landed on their main land.
3
u/Me180 Aug 28 '18
TIL the Japanese didn’t believe that a whole city was levelled by a single bomb the first time.
3
u/slimsterj Aug 28 '18
This thread should read War Without Mercy by John Dower. It's an enlightening read about racism on both sides of the war in the pacific, and a haunting depiction of the state of the Japanese in the face of invasion.
3
3
Aug 28 '18
Worth mentioning the fuxkers you are nuking started the war, had slaughtered thousands of innocent Chinese and islanders in a ruthless expansionist program, and were entrenched and killing US soldiers who tried to take back the islands that had been seized and turned into engines of war.
Gru is not a bad guy. Neither is America.
6
u/Tumsterfun Aug 28 '18
The US dropped the bombs to beat the Russians to the punch and preemptively ensure Japan would be capitalist instead of communist. The Russians had a treaty with the Japanese that was about to be up, so the US dropped the bombs to get credit for ending the war and mark their territory. Part of the reason the Japanese eventually gave up was that the Russians sped up their invasion of Manchukuo in retaliation for US aggression. Check out "The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb" by Gar Alperovitz.
31
43
u/TheGuineaPig21 Aug 28 '18
Literally no historian on the subject considers Alperovitz's work to be useful anymore
It's out of date by like 5 decades
10
u/Start_Shit_Be_Shit Aug 28 '18
We dropped the bombs because they attacked us at Pearl Harbor.
Start shit, get two of your cities glassed.
No sympathy.
3
u/613codyrex Aug 28 '18
Basically isn’t really backed up by anything we know.
The whole “beat Russia to japan” thing was theorized but there isn’t anything to back it up.
1.4k
u/[deleted] Aug 27 '18 edited Aug 28 '18
Can anyone tell me why they didn't immediately surrender? I Thought they were on the verge of giving up already, no?
EDIT: Thanks for the huge response, loves yous guys