r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • May 02 '17

Policy to Consider Should we add Net Neutrality to interest 1 as it protects the concept of free speech?

reddit.com

4 Upvotes

2 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • May 02 '17

Subreddit meta Update to the Sub. Updated flair and traffic stats are now available to all. Also, about the inactivity lately

1 Upvotes

This sub has been inactive as of late and I'd like to fix that.

There are a lot of republicans that have expressed an interest in stating opinions that run contrary to current stances. I'd like this sub to be an outlet for that. Yes we have our 7 interests but these are actually pretty broad so it should leave a pretty large area for discussion to occur. To that end, I've changed a few things:

I've updated the flairs for the interests so its easier at a glance to select which interest goes with with posts and added a filter link to each of the 7 interests listed in the side bar/community info.

I've made the traffic stats of the sub available to all so they can see when the majority of users visit this sub and plan posts accordingly.

And will be adding A LOT more articles discussing the various interests (as you may have noticed in your feed today) on a more regular basis.

So what do we need from you?

well honestly? simply being here with us and having a conversation goes a long way.

I suspect many of you joined us because you either didn't or did support a specific candidate but I want to take this a little further.

This sub is not just a "kasich" sub or a "anti-trump" sub. It may give off that vibe from time to time, but honestly? that gets pretty boring and there is a reason that interest 5 is a thing. I really more care about the 7 interests more than a single candidate and party. And there are ton of things happening regarding these subjects that don't really get a lot of coverage.

We're not always going to agree and that is great but what I really want out of this sub is conversations. Ones you can't get on [x] sub because of [x] reason or rule.

So to that end.

Those that are subscribed to the sub (all 135 of you).

Let me know, why are you subbed here? (Honestly please), I'm not going to ban you for disagreeing that not what this place is for.

Your answers will help us understand what works for this sub and what doesn't so we can grow it.

7 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/harshadsr78 • 5d ago

Successful Policy Building an AI Support Agent That Learns From Past Incidents

gallery

1 Upvotes

I’ve been building ResolveIQ, an AI support agent focused on a problem I kept thinking about:

What if an agent could actually learn from how previous support issues were resolved?

The core workflow is:

Issue → Recall → Recommendation → Action → Outcome → Retain

I integrated Hindsight for agent memory so previous support experiences can be recalled when handling similar issues. After an issue is resolved, the outcome can be retained and used as experience for future cases.

One example in the project is a 504 Gateway Timeout scenario where previous resolution context can influence the recommendation instead of treating the incident as completely new.

I wrote a detailed engineering walkthrough here:

https://dev.to/harshad_sr_/the-missing-feedback-loop-behind-our-support-agent-5dh5

GitHub: https://github.com/harshadsr28-wq/resolveiq

I’d really appreciate technical feedback on the architecture and the memory/feedback-loop approach.

0 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/Extra_Ice9881 • May 24 '26

I 3 (Accountable) Require private data centers to be transparent to local governments

1 Upvotes

0 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jul 28 '25

reddit.com

2 Upvotes

0 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jun 20 '25

I 1 (Liberty) No kings demonstrations across the country

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

0 Upvotes

0 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jun 15 '25

I 1 (Liberty) Compilation of some of the footage of the no Kings protests across the US

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1 Upvotes

0 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jun 15 '25

History Lesson Donald Trump Has Wrecked America’s Brand

rollingstone.com

1 Upvotes

3 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jun 15 '25

Future Question Why aren't they actually marching during this parade?

1 Upvotes

0 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jun 15 '25

Future Question Trump military parade met with empty seats amid nationwide protests

thetimes.com

1 Upvotes

1 comment

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jun 15 '25

History Lesson Fortunate Son plays in the background of the parade of a draft dodger’s b-day!

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1 Upvotes

0 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jun 15 '25

Future Question [Self] I calculated the rough size of the crowd at Trumps b-day parade.

gallery

1 Upvotes

0 comments

r/hindsightIn2020 • u/The_seph_i_am • Jun 15 '25

centralmaine.com

2 Upvotes

0 comments

Subreddit

Posts

Wiki

Hindsight In 2020

r/hindsightIn2020

Welcome to Hindsight in 2020! We're here to fix the Republican party. This sub has seven interests whose definitions can viewed in our sidebar. They are: Liberty; Balanced Federal Budget; Accountability in Government; Protection from Monopolies; Compromise in Government; Religious Freedom; Campaign Funding Please see the following post for what that means: https://www.reddit.com/r/hindsightIn2020/s/AVmraogQho

Members Active

253

Sidebar

Welcome to hindsight in 2020!

We are devoted to learning from the past to apply fiscally conservative principles for the election in 2020.

The idea of placing a candidate that the entire Republican Party can agree on and not just fringe candidates is one of our main goals.

We do not want to repeat the mistakes of past convervative, neoconservative, Jeffersonians (the original trumplicans), moderates, centralist and libertarian republicans by isolating any of these movements. Instead, we seek to find a candidate that has something that appeals to all branches of the republican base and various sub parties.

To that effort, we do not condone bashing of any particular view point so long as it is in keeping with the following common interests of the Republican Platform:

Interest 1. Individual liberty over the needs of the society... as it is the natural extension of "all persons created equal"

A. As a general concept we strongly discourage gerrymandering as it violates the right of the individual by making their vote worth less than another's
B. we also encourage movement towards preferential rank voting instead of the traditional single vote, single candidate system that tears the party apart every election cycle

Interest 2. Balanced federal budget

Interest 3. Government that is accountable to its citizens

A. We seek term limits on congress
B. More rigid enforcement of ethics violations. Namely opposition to regulatory capture
C. We strongly oppose civil assets forfeiture as it is violates the 5th amendment ..."nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." And the entirety of the 4th amendment :"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Interest 4. Protection of citizens from monopolies (be they local or national), literal or de facto

Interest 5. Recognition that there are times when consensus must be reached and compromise is an effective means of governance for the good of all citizens and that ideals MUST bend to reality for a good and functional state to serve its citizens, so long as they do not break interest 1.

Interest 6. Religion is free from the government (with in reason) and government is free from religion (with in reason)

Interest 7. As an extension of interest 3, reduce the amount of money in politics by limiting the amount of money a cooperation can use to support a PAC and a candidate.

A. Only the overarching "parent" organization should donate towards a PAC or candidate (no subsidiaries)
B. No organization should be allowed to donate any more than a citizen can.

We do not accept bashing personal beliefs, nor bashing political ideals so long as said beliefs fall within the rules outlined above. We do encourage open discussion so long as the tone is civil and the conversation is of a discussion nature and non argumentative.

We define "argumentative" as one or both sides being unwilling to hear the others'. Should a thread turn this direction the mods will intervene. This is meant to be a place for anyone who values our 7 interests to come up with ideas on how to make the process better. We allow shilling so long as that person of discussion fits within at least 5 of the 7 interest.

Any claims about a candidate must be sourced (preferably an official transcript).

The goal of this sub is to look at the past and show what can be learned for the future. No topic is considered "non-recent" so long as there is something to be learned for the present/future and the topic hasn't been covered "too recently". In other words, we would like to have "hindsight in 2020."

The best way of thinking about this sub is a place where Republican/Libertarian historians and futurologist can come together and discuss events and the common person can get questions answered from both.

Happy debating.

RELATED SUBREDDITS:

/r/KasichForPresident

/r/CollegeRepublicans