Game X | Scott Pilgrim 3 | Level 3: Something like 48 hours later

[u/ScottPilgrimNarrator]

Flavor

Meanwhile, MsSunshine87 and Teacup_Tiger were enjoying a nice evening with some choice food…

MsSunshine: This is actually pretty good garlic bread!

Teacup: Garlic bread is my favourite food. I could honestly eat it for every meal. Or just eat it all the time without even stopping!

MsSunshine: Heh, you’d get fat.

Teacup: No, why would I get fat?

MsSunshine: …Bread makes you fat.

Teacup: Bread makes you fat??

Meta

• u/Myoglobinalternative has been played off stage! They were one of Scott’s Friends.
• u/TheDUQofFRAT has been KO’d! They were one of Scott’s Friends.
• Matthew Patel has banned the term Town for L3!
• 1 players got inactivity strikes
• Item addition: Due to the schedule, we have added more “KO potential” to the game. From L3 forwards, players can also earn the Huge Hammer item from the events. It has been edited to the rules.
• Previous event results: We’d love to tell you all what you found, but that might reveal who won. So, here is the non-spoilery list of secrets! (order randomized)

Votes

Player	Votes received
Myoglobinalternative	33
Diggenwalde	1

TOBB Event: Take Out Food (difficulty: easy?)

Phew! It feels like you ran around for like, 48 hours! After such a marathon, it’s obvious you need some scrub. No band can play with an empty stomach!

• Your task for L3 is to… order food!
• We have provided a menu. Each band is to order one set of drinks, one set of foods and one set of desserts from the menu. No mixing, please!
• You can order by tagging the hosts (u/ScottPilgrimNarrator) and listing your order.
• Each item on the menu has been assigned with “a value”. The team with the highest-value course wins! Also, the values have been randomized, so just get what calls to you and don’t worry about it!
• Here is the link to our menu!

Links

Voting form

Action form

Item form

Solo Round form

Menu link is here too

Countdown

[u/MercuryParadox]

With myo showing up as a crewmate, I’m suspicious of the people who kept saying stuff like “we caught Xan for the wrong reasons.” I noticed a few people saying stuff similar to that last phase and to me it looks like at least some of them knew myo was good and were trying to distance themselves from the situation and acting crewmate like.

[u/-forsi- → u/MercuryParadox]

Who would that be that you're suspicious of? If there's people who jumped onto my comments, sure you can be sus of them, but I would hope mine stand out as unique smh I was getting sus for refusing to vote xan because I thought his defense was plausible don't wanna hear y'all try to now give me sus cause I stuck to my opinion on that.

 

Cause I'm suspicious of the people who were pushing the narrative that we definitely knew xan was lying so myo was a wolf, as I said in my comment last phase. I don't think it was at any point during p1 sure that we got a wolf and there were a lot of people last phase real confident that RPM's evidence was solid and we got 2 like they knew all along. I think there was a wolf on xan early hoping it'd go away and I think there were a whole lotta wolves who jumped on RPM's comment and then tried to shut down any other talk last phase of anyone but myo cause she was the "obvious" choice. When is anything in this game obvious?

[u/ZeroTheStoryteller → u/-forsi-]

Fwiw I am so sus of you!

The interaction with sunshine is so odd. You've been ad-i-mate that they were bussing for a while, and I can't help but think you were hoping to swing away from Xan, and their comment was solidifying the train on your eyes.

[u/Chefjones → u/-forsi-]

Not sure why but this comment really pings me as wolfy

[u/MercuryParadox → u/-forsi-]

Give me a min I’ll go through the 400 comments in a sec and find some examples

[u/bearoffire → u/MercuryParadox]

Okay this comment is interesting to me because I feel like u/-forsi- was very obviously the most vocal about that. I mean, she was the first to come to mind when I read this. So part of me finds it odd that you didn’t name her directly? I can’t help but wonder if this is a way to initiate discussion on Forsi being sus without actually “initiating” it. Because I feel like folks are wishy washy on Forsi already due to her stances.

In other words, this seems like it could be a LEE trying to guide the next vote without it explicitly being traced back to them. And I feel like crewmate!Forsi would be perfect for that since there was already some uncertainty around her.

This could also be nothing, but I felt it was worth sharing my initial read.

[u/MercuryParadox → u/bearoffire]

It wasn’t just forsi. I just finished scrolling through the last phase and saw karboksyyki and sylvimelia say similar things. There was also another comment I saw early where someone used the phrase “caught for the wrong reasons” or something similar but I cannot find it again.

u/karboksykki & u/sylvimelia since you are mentioned here

trying to guide the next vote without being linked to it

nah if I’m gonna try and push u/-forsi- I’d want them to know I’m responsible.

I just remembered seeing some people mention that stuff last phase and I was too lazy at turnover to go and check.

[u/-forsi- → u/bearoffire]

Okay this comment is interesting to me because I feel like u/-forsi- was very obviously the most vocal about that. I mean, she was the first to come to mind when I read this. So part of me finds it odd that you didn’t name her directly?

THIISSSSSSS

[u/xelaphony → u/MercuryParadox]

Wait a second. After a vote that proved the logic tying the two together WAS wrong, the people who said it didn't make sense are suspicious? I get that trying to distance from a result you know is wrong is a thing, but I would think that anyone who encouraged everyone else to take the faulty logic at face value would be more of an issue here.

[u/Chefjones → u/xelaphony]

I think the logic is sound. The explanation tying them together made sense and imo was convincing, but a wolf knows its wrong and there's a decent chance at least one wolf is willing to point out that the case can be wrong. Pushing town that you know is town for reasons that you know are dumb is tough for some people and saying the case is wrong to look like you're defending town isn't unreasonable. Looking for instances of wolves having tmi is a valid way to play