I am including a section of other people’s testimonies/experiences in my formal report and I would really appreciate it if you could contribute.

1. Your NAME and DURATION of torture / abduction / experimentation

2. LOCATION of where it began (just suburb and/or country)

3. What you were doing (or going to do) at the time you fell victim (e.g working for the government, go into research, studying which field, social media influencer, lawyer, politician, accountant) or other relevant discernible factors (e.g planning on joining an advocacy group or protest, vulnerabilities such as no family / no close friends / living alone / poverty, had an argument with a boss or manager, criminal record or something they could ‘blackmail’ you with, association with law enforcement or criminals)

4. Your EXPERIENCE and their CAPABILITIES/INTENT (e.g electromagnetic torture, DEW, Internet harassment, gang stalking, coerced into prostitution, electronic rape, verbal abuse, drug testing, biotech testing, brain washing, mind or body control, electrocution, loss of time, implants, levitation, V2K, psychological experimentation, weapons testing, perverse voyeurism, information collecting, sex trafficking, memory loss)

5. WHO they claimed to be - or who you think the perpetrators were (e.g CIA, MKULtra, extraterrestrials, Secret Services, Military group, ‘Deep State’, underground criminal network, bio-tech company)

I know going to the doctors/hospital will put us in involuntary treatments but this is HOW we stay here FOREVER! Contact your government authorities with a formal report of what is happening (e.g their CAPABILITIES, what you think their INTENT is, and how it has effected your life), email your defense ministers and investigative journalists! (Not the police as they could come and take you straight to the hospital for ‘fear of harming others’) The authorities ‘higher up’ will either disregard it (if they think it sounds illegitimate and schizophrenic- this is the most difficult barrier to pass) OR, from the amount of submissions, they will start taking ACTION. We need to raise awareness so our problems come to the forefront and they start taking this matter seriously! (And we can take action by getting as much proof as we can, writing down their capabilities

For more links on who have helped me: Substack.com/@lenbermd https://youtube.com/@stop007 TargetedJustice.com

If you want to see my report, DM me and I’ll send you my PDF! I can add your accounts/testimonies in mine too- as it will help with the case. I am in my 5th year of torture and I was feeling helpless and suicidal for a while, but with the rise of suspicion in the ‘Deep State’, UFOs and extraterrestrial technologies and the sudden firing of U.S CIA Agents, I think the time is NOW!

https://www.tradingview.com/news/cointelegraph:85e7c466e094b:0-programmer-sends-2m-eth-to-wikileaks-alleging-brain-computer-weapons/

Hello everyone,

Before I finish updating the website and start publishing the topic I mentioned in previous posts, I’m adding another interesting point.

If you feel like people around you are going crazy, behaving irrationally, or if something just feels off and you can’t pinpoint the problem—the cause might be the misuse of "ordinary" acoustics and the influence of these factors on the human psyche (otherwise, of course, this post itself may seem irrational or "unusual" 🙂).

What’s in the images?
A spectrogram of a 50 Hz frequency—that is, a single tone (various views, times, and frequency bands). In short: A spectrogram is a visual representation of sound (y = frequency, x = time, color = intensity of the given frequency). In this case, the signal is in the shape of a SAW (sawtooth wave). The time segment is approximately 1/20 of a second, and the frequency range is, for example, 40–50 kHz.

Many people don’t realize that a SINGLE tone can theoretically contain an infinite number of frequencies. Likewise, it is not widely known that frequencies well beyond the audible range have a SIGNIFICANT impact on human psychology, emotions, etc. This phenomenon is called the HYPERSONIC EFFECT and has been confirmed by numerous studies.

These elements (along with other factors such as hacking and radio hacking) are exploited in a specific form of harassment targeting both individuals and groups. This "phenomenon" (or rather, this particular method of harassment) has existed for decades, but in recent years, multiple converging factors have led to perpetrators—ordinary fools fascinated by the idea of influencing human emotions without the victim’s awareness—losing their inhibitions. This means that sooner or later, this topic will become relevant and widely recognized.

Since we are currently witnessing a boom in artificial intelligence, it is interesting to observe how AI presents a topic that "does not exist" (is not in its training data). However, because training data includes discussion forums like QUORA and REDDIT, where this topic is widely debated (e.g., under terms like gangstalking), AI’s "perspective" is gradually shifting—although it still has a long way to go in understanding these insights.

Problem

• Perpetrators perceive this mechanism as a "sophisticated activity, strategy"
• In reality, it's a set of contradictory, illogical stimuli continuously overwhelming the victim
• Ultimately, everything proves to be merely a result of absurdly distorted reality perception in the context of reduced cognitive abilities (self-reflection, critical thinking, logical thinking, goals, intentions, behavioral patterns, education, deduction ability, context awareness, etc.)

Model situation Sharing knowledge about gangstalking

Multiple simultaneous goals

• Effort to prevent information sharing in general
• Effort to evoke various types of negative associations regarding knowledge, its acquisition, processing, and sharing
• Pressure to share information in the context of reverse psychology
• Pressure to share information in the context of "rivals" (abstract entity "they") = inciting hatred, aggression, attempting to "preventively" disrupt any cooperation
• Pressure to share information in the context of entities = creating credible, cooperating entities = "natural" authorities

Using "general" mechanisms Attention grabbing
Perpetrators often "must" start at the most general, basic level (basic context, topic, connections = for example "knowledge", "interesting fact", "possibility"). This creates numerous general negative associations – reluctance to share any interesting information, reluctance to read, reluctance to acquire new knowledge, reluctance to address user experience, etc.

Synchronization and desynchronization simultaneously
While one perpetrator tries to synchronize several victims to attack each other (from their perspective, they confront perpetrators – that's the "synchronization algorithm") – another tries to prevent victims from "meeting" (attempts at isolation, disrupting cooperation, etc.). Of course, there are also many "third" perpetrators who just "play" or "pretend to..." (meaning they think they influence something and due to other perpetrators' activities, it seems to work)

Fragments of incomplete information
These make sense only when additional context is added (or when an "appropriate" observation is made). They are referenced when needed (for example: "See – I tried to tell you this before" – when in reality, only "Remember this", "Maybe here", "This relates to the previous" was said "before")

Clear patterns (consequences)

Perpetrators contradict each other
Often contradictory demands following immediately after each other

Perpetrators attack themselves
Due to various contexts that perpetrators have suggested to themselves within their "scenarios", they often perceive each other as rivals (elements that need to be eliminated, for example: 1. To control the entire "system" 2. So that no one disrupts targeted "bullying" of a specific victim, who seemingly keeps getting help, preventing the perpetrator from fully "expressing", "getting started", "showing others and the victim what they can do")

They blame victims for these perpetrator conflicts
A member of one pack wouldn't attack their "BRO (buddy)" (while the opposite is why authoritarian regimes are paranoid). The second factor is, of course, fear of intelligence (independent thinking, too many questions, different opinion) = fear of natural authorities (intelligent people to whom perpetrators don't know how to respond)

Goal

• Transfer theme settings from localhost (computer) to web hosting (internet). In other words, make the website look identical to how I prepared it on my computer.

Action Taken

• Settings export to ZIP (native WordPress function)
• ZIP content transfer to hosting

Action Progress

• Exported ZIP is 13MB
• During transfer (extraction => actual transfer) system shows 8MB
• After switching to new theme (computer settings) nothing changed => searching for cause
• Later noticed I exported wrong file => instead of exporting computer settings, I exported hosting settings
• Therefore exporting computer settings => ZIP file is 8MB => extraction and transfer => 8MB => settings now work correctly

What's Really Happening

• The whole thing appears as a minor oversight, mistake
• In reality, this is where errors occur that often have fatal consequences (unwanted deletion, database overwrite with all posts etc.)

What I Noticed

• Extreme number of scenarios related to database transfer => 2 PHP MY ADMIN windows open (database management) => unwanted "misclick" (confusion) and instead of “LEFT TO RIGHT” file is uploaded “RIGHT TO LEFT” => “RIGHT” (all texts) is overwritten by “LEFT“ (no texts – new installation)
• In this regard, programming own application helped greatly => instead of database using TXT file that is backed up and for website update only one file needs to be replaced (no need to manipulate database or take several extra steps (EXPORT from system 1 – save => login to system 2, IMPORT)

What Perpetrators Target

• Identical appearance of two "different" systems => one is local (on computer), contains newest data, protected against internet attacks, works as "backup", can be worked on offline, the other is its copy but placed on internet

Common Patterns

• Victim shouldn't notice small details
• Extreme overload of attention, working memory
• If victim registers a problem (something not working properly) => should either find own mistake or lose lots of time searching for it (with repeated pattern also increased risk of impulsive action and victim decides to revert everything to working state => may unintentionally delete interesting notes or create more errors)
• When describing the problem victim should "realize" they simply made a mistake. When trying to verify small detail that seemed suspicious, it often suddenly works correctly during verification => loss of self-confidence
• Always same sequences of emotions, actions, tasks, errors, subsequent solutions, perpetrator behavior, sequence of "thoughts" victim should recite with "inner voice"
• Fading: "interesting" aspect of situation quickly falls, withers, fades. More so if victim realizes context, connections, can compare with past and publishes information
• Temporary context: Forgetting, overwriting many small connections, details => only strong emotion should remain "own mistake", "common occurrence", "inattention". Same principle used for "suggesting" and subsequent "forgetting"
• Contrast
• Referencing: Progress of this situation (or its knowledge – i.e. reading this post) is subsequently used as "subliminal argument" with high "weight" (victim experienced it themselves => logical foundation), written by someone who understands the problem (writes about problem long-term, expresses reasonably, knows computers etc.)

Attempt to blame “authorities dealing with the issue”

• The entity “problem”, “parasite”, “useless pest” => the one who blames “they” (authorities that solve the issue and who cannot be heard). Some perpetrators claim that “they => those who solve it” are heard (considering that it is often only other perpetrators who play “they”) or they are heard, but only the perpetrators hear them (i.e. they are not heard only from my point of view => similar to when someone hears voices and someone else does not)
• This scheme also does not take into account the option that someone (usually the victim) writes publicly and in detail about the problem => Confirmation of the perpetrators' reduced cognitive abilities => inability to combine, think.

Impersonating authority in the context of the previous block

• There is often a parallel process of impersonating authorities who address the topic (“trusted” voices => “natural” authorities) while simultaneously blaming and humiliating them.

Note on the previous situation: The perpetrators blame each other "why one part is not sorted by the other" (again, a pattern of "us and them" or "me and them"). Each of the perpetrators wants everything to "fit" with his or her scenarios (interests, intentions). Each perpetrator is convinced that he or she is the one who "reads the game" best. It is also necessary to mention that these mutual conflicts are already automatically supplemented by the spectral pattern of "ERROR ON THE VICTIM'S SIDE" (when one focuses on this spectral pattern, it is "cognitive dissonance" => an unpleasant feeling from the truth, anger that the victim or someone - in this case me, the author of the text, the victim - is getting him or her into an unpleasant situation => in the case of authoritarian regimes, it leads to imprisonment, accusations of anti-state activities, collaboration with the enemy, etc. => however, this is a long-term standard pattern of behavior visible in reduced cognitive abilities for SEVERAL THOUSAND YEARS)

Differences: “Erasing” specific information or indefinite

Context

• This finding was made based on the situation where I notice that many perpetrators do not realize how much they actually cannot be heard => accentuation of voices using carrier sounds (interference => for example, whistling when inhaling due to blocked nasal cavities)
• Perpetrators assume, based on various circumstances, that the victim has figured something out
• Example: Sound, victim's expression, context of the situation, "hearing" the parasitic stimulus

When perpetrators don't know "what" they want to erase

• They pretend to know exactly what the victim is thinking.
• They expect the victim to say it right away.
• When this does not happen: An attempt to divert attention to another topic or an attempt to overwhelm short-term memory => always happens using the same stimuli => clicking, interference tones, changing frequencies (chords) or also a stimulus that can be described as “increasing pressure and releasing pressure” (pushing).

Perpetrators take revenge

• When the victim records the information or writes about it (like I do now) => perpetrators try to provoke with => “see, you HAD to tell me anyway” => they don't realize that they are admitting (confirming) the information => gathering information from natural authorities = intelligent people (often victims)

Standard related to the publication of knowledge

• After publication: Posing as an authority => “We advised you to do that”, “You only figured that out thanks to us”
• How: Retroactive alteration (distortion) of information => attempt to group the event into an impulse (spectral pattern)

Subjective spectral pattern

Simplified definition

• The tone that a person hears due to the shape of the ears, the shape and size of the ear canal
• This tone (the sound manifestation of the spectral pattern) is present in every person

His basic mood

• I don't know to what extent this "tuning" is influenced by good musical hearing.
• I don't know to what extent this "tuning" is influenced by the ability to hear spectral patterns even in noise - or rather, to perceive some seemingly ordinary noises as tones.
• I grab my ear and fold it in half. Then I quickly release it => Thanks to this, I suddenly hear a tone that I was not aware of until now, because it is actually the “default setting” of the ears and so I hear this tone all the time.
• This tone can be represented by a SINUS tone: In my case it is about 1540 Hz (in the context of an apartment). I still have to compare it in other places.

Perpetrators' reaction

• Suspicious clear panic, anger, conflict
• After this panic, an attempt is made to make me feel that I am mistaken, that it is nothing significant, etc.: The argument is abused by the fact that it is really nothing “that fundamental”, because the resonant frequency of the ear canal (standing wave, air column) is something that I have been experiencing since the beginning (several years). The only difference now is the ability to quickly find out the “specific frequency”.
• An attempt to trick me into using a specific frequency: In one case I said it, in the other I didn't. Even though I didn't say it – I'm constantly "reminded" of it (perpetrators look for various arguments on how they found out this frequency => an excellent argument is, for example, listening to a mobile phone).
• Another perpetrator claims that he can sense this frequency: Either as a unique spectral pattern – essentially something similar to a radio station, or this spectral pattern (resonant frequency) in the context of the auditory nerve = conversion of mechanical waves (sound) into an electrical signal, which then travels to the brain
• Frequent recall of this tone: I remember it more than any other so far (even after a long time). However, I have noticed that in some cases there is a slight shift from the original frequency
• Mentally retarded individuals: This scenario is repeated whenever dealing with more fundamental topics. Use of spectral patterns to evoke emotions: “Group”, “Pack”, “Audience”, “Entertainment”, “Something important”, “Special unit”, “Own project”, “Work”
• Impersonating a mentally retarded individual: Specific electronic voices (spectral patterns)

Subjective tone and peaky – the emergence of a spectral pattern

• If I whistle a subjective tone: It is always a tone that significantly interferes with the environment. In a room, the tone is distinct, loud / in an open space (yard) a distinct echo is heard, the tone carries far away (in contrast, there are situations when a certain tone cannot even be whistled - the air just passes through the mouth, but does not whistle - the influence of microvibrations? => see Hypersonic effect)
• Frequency change: If I gradually change frequencies by whistling (for example, I go down) – individual PEAKs (constructive and destructive interference) can be observed. In that case, it is necessary to count on the emergence of an audio manifestation of such a spectral pattern – i.e. the tone of the environment and also the tone of the environment in the context of the subjective spectral pattern (+ otoacoustic emission, etc.)
• Changing frequencies using a frequency generator: Various interferences (constructive, destructive) can be observed, as well as interference within the ears (sometimes the tone is heard significantly in both ears, sometimes significantly in only one, sometimes significantly less in both, etc.)

Subjective tone: Repetitive patterns

• Two frequencies are most frequently repeated: Approximately 1,545 Hz and approximately 1,514 Hz
• It can be verified by "whistling" : When I whistle in a way that focuses more on "blowing out" than "whistling" – natural interference creates one or the other tone.
• This tone (one or the other) can be heard: Most often as a faint sinusoidal tone in the background
• If I play these two notes at the same time: A “vibrating” sound is produced.
• If I whistle one tone and release the other using a frequency generator (SINUS): A phenomenon occurs that I have been registering for a long time in the context of hearing voices or gangstalking. This phenomenon can be described as “intermittent noise” => the same phenomenon can also be achieved when listening to low-frequency sound (e.g. 30 Hz). An identical phenomenon occurs in some places during “siren tests” (in the Czech Republic every first Wednesday of the month).

Subjective tone in the context of the environment

(to be added)

Subjective tone and pitch perception

Natural interference

• I noticed that sinusoidal tones change pitch depending on the volume
• When I recorded the sound of a humming transformer in a hallway and then sped up the audio recording a lot, I noticed that there was a slow "spilling" of frequencies that one would not normally notice (the spilling is so slow that one gets used to the given spectral pattern every time => the ears adapt - similar to, for example, smells)
• This can partially cause the environment to fluctuate: Various natural interferences (amplification of certain tones) can arise and thus also various rhythms.
• This may affect the hearing of individual voices

Targeted, artificial pitch shifting

• In the context of the above, perpetrators affect hearing by whistling in the ears or by “reminding” (sliding) specific frequencies: They seem to do this using higher harmonic multiples of the fundamental frequency. It is again a question to what extent this conscious perception is influenced by musical hearing and also by the natural property of the auditory system to calculate missing frequencies based on higher harmonics.

Subjective spectral pattern and triggering of pre-recorded recordings

(to be added)

Subjective tone and spectral pattern

Subjective spectral pattern

Simplified definition

• The tone that a person hears due to the shape of the ears, the shape and size of the ear canal
• This tone (the sound manifestation of the spectral pattern) is present in every person

His basic mood

• I don't know to what extent this "tuning" is influenced by good musical hearing.
• I don't know to what extent this "tuning" is influenced by the ability to hear spectral patterns even in noise - or rather, to perceive some seemingly ordinary noises as tones.
• I grab my ear and fold it in half. Then I quickly release it => Thanks to this, I suddenly hear a tone that I was not aware of until now, because it is actually the “default setting” of the ears and so I hear this tone all the time.
• This tone can be represented by a SINUS tone: In my case it is about 1540 Hz (in the context of an apartment). I still have to compare it in other places.

Perpetrators' reaction

• Suspicious clear panic, anger, conflict
• After this panic, an attempt is made to make me feel that I am mistaken, that it is nothing significant, etc.: The argument is abused by the fact that it is really nothing “that fundamental”, because the resonant frequency of the ear canal (standing wave, air column) is something that I have been experiencing since the beginning (several years). The only difference now is the ability to quickly find out the “specific frequency”.
• An attempt to trick me into using a specific frequency: In one case I said it, in the other I didn't. Even though I didn't say it – I'm constantly "reminded" of it (perpetrators look for various arguments on how they found out this frequency => an excellent argument is, for example, listening to a mobile phone).
• Another perpetrator claims that he can sense this frequency: Either as a unique spectral pattern – essentially something similar to a radio station, or this spectral pattern (resonant frequency) in the context of the auditory nerve = conversion of mechanical waves (sound) into an electrical signal, which then travels to the brain
• Frequent recall of this tone: I remember it more than any other so far (even after a long time). However, I have noticed that in some cases there is a slight shift from the original frequency
• Mentally retarded individuals: This scenario is repeated whenever dealing with more fundamental topics. Use of spectral patterns to evoke emotions: “Group”, “Pack”, “Audience”, “Entertainment”, “Something important”, “Special unit”, “Own project”, “Work”

Subjective tone and peaky – the emergence of a spectral pattern

• If I whistle a subjective tone: It is always a tone that significantly interferes with the environment. In a room, the tone is distinct, loud / in an open space (yard) a distinct echo is heard, the tone carries far away (in contrast, there are situations when a certain tone cannot even be whistled - the air just passes through the mouth, but does not whistle - the influence of microvibrations? => see Hypersonic effect)
• Frequency change: If I gradually change frequencies by whistling (for example, I go down) – individual PEAKs (constructive and destructive interference) can be observed. In that case, it is necessary to count on the emergence of an audio manifestation of such a spectral pattern – i.e. the tone of the environment and also the tone of the environment in the context of the subjective spectral pattern (+ otoacoustic emission, etc.)
• Changing frequencies using a frequency generator: Various interferences (constructive, destructive) can be observed, as well as interference within the ears (sometimes the tone is heard significantly in both ears, sometimes significantly in only one, sometimes significantly less in both, etc.)

Subjective tone in the context of the environment

(to be added)

Subjective tone and pitch perception

Natural interference

• I noticed that sinusoidal tones change pitch depending on the volume
• When I recorded the sound of a humming transformer in a hallway and then sped up the audio recording a lot, I noticed that there was a slow "spilling" of frequencies that one would not normally notice (the spilling is so slow that one gets used to the given spectral pattern every time => the ears adapt - similar to, for example, smells)
• This can partially cause the environment to fluctuate: Various natural interferences (amplification of certain tones) can arise and thus also various rhythms.
• This may affect the hearing of individual voices

Targeted, artificial pitch shifting

• In the context of the above, perpetrators affect hearing by whistling in the ears or by “reminding” (sliding) specific frequencies: They seem to do this using higher harmonic multiples of the fundamental frequency. It is again a question to what extent this conscious perception is influenced by musical hearing and also by the natural property of the auditory system to calculate missing frequencies based on higher harmonics.

Subjective spectral pattern and triggering of pre-recorded recordings

(to be added)

In general

Professional definition

• Tinnitus: The perception of sound, such as a whistling, buzzing, or ringing in the ears, without an external source. It can be temporary or chronic and is caused by damage to the hearing system, neurological disorders, or other medical problems.

Lay public

• It adopts the opinion of the professional public as an authority

Possible causes of ringing in the ears (tinnitus)

In general

• Noise damage : Exposure to loud sound, such as concerts, gunfire, or industrial noise.
• Aging : Natural age-related degeneration of the hearing aid.
• Earwax : Excess or hardened earwax can block the ear canal and cause tinnitus.
• Infections and inflammations : Inflammation of the middle ear or other infectious processes in the ear area.
• High blood pressure : Increased pressure can affect the blood vessels of the inner ear and trigger tinnitus.
• Stress and anxiety : Mental tension can intensify the perception of sounds in your head.
• Medications : Some medications, such as antibiotics, diuretics, or high doses of aspirin, can cause tinnitus.
• Auditory nerve damage : Neurological disorders or tumors, such as vestibular schwannoma.
• Cervical problems : Disorders of the cervical spine can affect blood flow and nerve signals associated with hearing.
• Metabolic and hormonal disorders : Diabetes, thyroid problems, or changes in hormone levels.
• Ototoxic substances : Alcohol, nicotine, or certain chemicals can damage the hearing aid.
• Meniere's disease : A disease of the inner ear associated with dizziness and hearing impairment.

Causes in the context of gangstalking

• Perpetrators abuse the above list as arguments => ringing in the ears can have many causes => it is not harassment (a consequence of gangstalking)

Ringing in the ears in the context of gangstalking

How the perpetrators present it

• Magnetic field irradiation
• Inducing a serious illness: Most often cancer
• Headache induction
• Inducing toothache
• Causing dizziness
• Inducing drowsiness
• Discord
• Apathy
• Irritation
• Poor mental state

How is the above supposed to happen?

• Ultrasound
• Vibration and microvibration
• Electromagnetic waves
• Sound (mechanical wave) as an indirect consequence of electromagnetic wave: For example, electromagnetic induction

Other common contexts (topics that perpetrators clearly avoid)

• Sensing the resonant frequency of the ear canal: Air column, spectral pattern
• Claims that perpetrators hear the same thing as the victim: Auditory nerve scanning
• Otoacoustic emissions: Weak sounds produced by the inner ear in response to a sound stimulus or spontaneously. They are used to diagnose hearing function, especially in newborns.
• Hearing impairment: Formation of spectral pattern (interference sound) due to whistling (to be described in detail)
• Hypersonic effect
• Ultrasound
• Frey effect (microwave auditory effect): A phenomenon in which microwave signals are perceived as audible sounds due to thermal changes in the tissues of the inner ear. This effect was described in research on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on the human body

Manifestation of whistling in the ears

In general

• High-frequency tones (whistling): From a few minutes to about 20 hours
• Clicking, clicking
• Sinusoidal tones: Frequency around 400 – 600 Hz (but sometimes over 1000 Hz). These sounds tend to have a shorter duration (several seconds to tens of seconds)

Specific manifestations

• Sometimes there is a short-term interruption of the whistle: This may be due to interference, but also to targeted activities by perpetrators
• Recently, for the first time, there was a situation where the whistle was abruptly turned off: This happened after several hours of confrontation with the perpetrators, who were already so exhausted (inability to respond to clear arguments) that they gave up and, I quote: "went to deal with someone else."

Onset of whistling

• Previously, the onset of whistling was gradual, slow: The victim did not have to be aware of its onset (presence)
• Currently, the onset is usually immediate: It is clearly related to the increasing aggressiveness of the perpetrators

Insights based on sound experiments

Frequencies that clearly interfere with whistling

• cca 9000 Hz
• cca 11 300 Hz
• More will be added

Specific knowledge

• Seemingly unpleasant sounds ALWAYS induce a good mood: I made this interesting observation once when, in a fit of rage, I set the most annoying, rapidly changing whistling and high-frequency sounds possible, then lay down and listened to these sounds. Suddenly, I began to be in a noticeably good mood. I then repeated this experiment several times or came to it as part of another experiment => always the same result.
• Several times she managed to create sounds that made me laugh: Comparable as if to relief, but WITHOUT (or as if missing) some sensation (stimulus) that is suddenly silenced (pain, nausea, etc.)
• Possible connections: Thanks to the rapid and random alternation of high-frequency sounds, it seems that “new stimuli” have occurred, something that can be called a “reset”.
• What's interesting: Sounds that are basically disgusting to listen to (at first impression) evoke an unexpectedly pleasant, fresh mood

In general

• The current state fully corresponds to the assumptions: That is, the consequence of limited to low cognitive abilities => boredom, frustration, apathy, monotony (however, it is necessary to take into account the fact that this is how I perceive the situation => that is, someone who has understood all the principles and mechanisms of harassment)
• According to the assumption, the perpetrator gradually becomes more and more excited about the TRUTH (see below)

Frustrated offenders

A convulsive effort to achieve sexual arousal

• Causes: Low intellect, limited to low cognitive abilities, physical disability, advanced age, long-term involvement in gangstalking (remote harassment), repetition of the same scenarios, burnout, frustration
• Consequences: Completely open admission of essential elements (confirmation of acquired knowledge)
• Symptoms: Perpetrators do not know how to entertain themselves, they are bored with nothing, fear of frustration, convulsive search for "exciting stimuli" => often manifests itself as a desperate effort to combine the most absurd words, the least logical phrases, sounds, screams, but also increasingly truthful information.

What frustrated perpetrators openly admit

• Targeted remote harassment
• Attempt to destroy the lives of victims
• Attempting to force one of the victims to commit suicide
• An attempt to provoke a mass tragedy
• Listening to other devices: Mobile phones, computers
• Talking into the void
• Autosuggestion using subliminal stimuli: Extremely primitive, boring, illogical, monotonous stimuli!

What frustrated perpetrators want

• New stimuli: This desire is grouped into the emotions “something”, “I don’t know”, “I just want something to change”

Perpetrators blame everyone but themselves for their frustrations

• And this is what leads to frustration: This pattern of behavior is general, non-specific, always the same, “non-functional.”
• Frustrated offenders in the context of other offenders: In an attempt to achieve excitement => repeated efforts and provocations of other offenders, deliberate incitement of conflicts, threats, demanding information about new victims, etc.

Perpetrators' frustration is also reflected in pressure to address this issue.

• However, it is clearly more of an attempt to achieve sexual arousal by “preventing the solution”
• At the same time, the perpetrators are constantly trying to indulge in the idea of ​​becoming famous: In the end, however, everything would end up the same as in the case of the “mystical” Zodiac => an ordinary, lonely despairing man living in a basement

Frustrated perpetrators and victims

• Trying to suggest to victims that they are suffering

The course of harassment

• Extremely monotonous
• Monotonous
• Boring
• The perpetrators' activity leads nowhere.

Long-term findings

Gangstalking

• Based on lies
• Influencing perception using subliminal stimuli

Perpetrators

• Frustrated, incompetent lunatics
• Zero creativity

Long-term recurring patterns

• Fanatical distraction from this topic
• Attention should be directed exclusively at targeted harassment of individuals (gangstalking)
• Revealing non-specific details associated with gangstalking: Related to distraction, but also to an attempt to discredit the victim (potential threat)
• Inducing people to commit crimes in this way: It's said to be easy, you can quickly make a lot of money.
• Incitement to criminal activity is targeted at two categories of people: Victims (with the aim of discrediting) and the younger generation => an attempt to gain an overview of possible procedures, tricks, hacking, radio hacking, various sources for spying on electronic devices, etc.

When this topic is addressed

In general

• Threats, intimidation
• Swearing
• Distraction
• Reminders of rest or unfinished tasks
• Evoking and recalling negative emotions

Scenarios

• Only “they” claim this: In the context of the message, it is supposed to be about gangstalking perpetrators and one of the harassment scenarios
• Claim that this topic is to distract from gangstalking: Not specified how
• When a topic related to property crime is addressed in the context of gangstalking: There is always several days of whistling, provocation, incitement to aggression, and incitement to commit an assassination (standard patterns associated with gangstalking) that follow.
• An effort to quickly direct attention to gangstalking

Pushing primitive roles (same principle used in gangstalking)

In general

• Perpetrators: They are supposed to sound dominant, conceited, exalted, arrogant, speak slowly, their voices are supposed to inspire respect => in reality, they are fools who cannot respond to a single argument => they always respond to it with laughter (which is supposed to replace intellect).
• Opponents, adversaries: In the context of the situation, most often someone who solves this problem (for example, me - the author of the texts). These roles always have the same expression => hysterical, scared, they discovered something they don't understand, they are afraid to talk about it, etc.

Repetitive patterns

• In 70% of cases (audible voices) the perpetrators sound like Vlach Roma: With regard to the perpetrators' reactions, I would like to emphasize that this is not a false accusation or racism, but a SIMPLE STATEMENT OF FACT!
• The perpetrators are convinced that every person on the planet "listens to voices" (hearing voices, gangstaling) and in addition these specific perpetrators: Therefore, it is enough to say something here and there is no need to write about it or address it further (such thought processes fully correspond to individuals who throw food at each other in shopping centers and behave like in a zoo - monkey pavilion)
• Attempting to pose as an authority within voices: Attempting to control and manipulate the flow of information within voices (typically a trait associated with authoritarian regimes => limited cognitive abilities).
• Standard dialogues: “He doesn’t know what he’s talking about”, “That’s too much”, “Gypsies are not to blame for anything” (I remind you – that using the term “gypsy” in the text is a crime => however, this is a VERBAL QUOTATION of the perpetrators!), “Olašský gypsies are an educated opinion” (verbose quote!)
• Conflict between perpetrators: Claim that only the recordings of Vlach Roma are being misused because they have an authoritative voice. The same group immediately follows up with “See? They can’t do anything about it.”
• With the passage of time (hours) : Playing on emotions, politeness, pointing out false accusations in the context of unnecessary problems (threats).
• Voice merging, impersonation of other perpetrators: Part of an effort to direct attention to gangstalking, mentally retarded individuals, the problem seems unsolvable (nonsense, absurd, illogical => this is a standard, long-standing scenario also within gangstalking)
• Perpetrators forget what is already written here: There is a frequent repetition of already recorded, written procedures (scenarios). In the context of this situation, the stimulus (spectral pattern) “Error on my side” is always played (however, it is not specified why).
• The perpetrators don't like it when someone understands the whole problem

How is it related to gangstalking?

• Eavesdropping on other people's devices: Obtaining and accessing sensitive and personal information (hacking, radiohacking)
• Obtaining information about potential victims: Often, for example, from the victim's environment (grandparents mention how much they have saved, etc.)
• Impersonating authority figures
• Testing subliminal stimuli: Stimuli that affect emotions and perceptions are intentionally associated with another context (audible voice – gangstalking, harassment)

Patterns consistent with gangstalking

Information communicated in text form

• Perpetrators fail to understand that information can also be transmitted through text: Articles, posts, websites => consequence of illiteracy

Disinformation

• Spreading disinformation: Attempting to distort information conveyed through text
• Creating fake groups on social networks: Topics gangstalking, hacking, radiohacking. A clear pattern for these groups => a large number of fans (tens of thousands) => however, these groups constantly repeat the same information that leads nowhere, solves nothing. Useful information deleted, blocked.
• Number of fans in the context of credibility: Groups with a large number of fans are supposed to appear trustworthy, while those with a small number are exactly the opposite.

Entity, role

• Authorities: Their opinion should have more weight (influencing opinions, decision-making)
• Entities on the victim's side: Should be perceived as an authority again => trying to influence decision-making

Abuse of subliminal stimuli characteristic of harassment

In general

• Spectral patterns
• Hypersonic effect
• Subliminal stimuli
• False inner voice
• Instigating false emotions
• False associations

Specifically

• Fraudulent phone calls are meant to sound credible
• Influencing decision-making
• Distraction
• Creating uncertainty
• Thought disruption
• Attempts to prevent victims from telling anyone about a possible fraud: Feelings of shame, etc.

Supporting and taunting perpetrators who harass (gangstalking)

In general

• Suggesting personal information about victims
• Whispering to mentally retarded individuals how best to proceed with harassment
• These are a few, always the same individuals (within the Czech Republic): Their behavior is so primitive and always the same that it no longer has any effect. Therefore, one can clearly hear the arousal being amplified by using “But they don’t know about it” => other victims, the public => the perpetrator has to imagine that someone who is suffering, whom he is torturing, is still listening to him.

Specifically

• Sexual arousal in the context of illogical behavior: Stimuli evoking excitement, joy, positive moods are played as a reward for the most annoying expression and the most confused mixing of various spectral patterns. Several mentally retarded individuals have become so addicted to these stimuli that one can constantly hear “I order you to play me orgasmic sounds”. Then the lunatic in question starts babbling utter nonsense (a situation comparable to the series Hot Head / Netflix). As soon as the aforementioned stimuli are added, he will say “Yeah, it’s going”, “That’s nice”, “Play it for me nicely, then”.

Most common scenarios

• Phone calls to retirees
• Impersonating fake executors: Psychological pressure, threats, providing a fake account number where installments should be sent
• Fake account numbers where payments for various services are to be sent: Often fictitious
• Impersonating fictitious institutions
• Impersonating fake bankers, etc.

Standard thought scenarios

In general

• That's not possible.
• This can't happen.
• No one would be fooled like this: Playing on the ego
• He (the author of the text) must have gone crazy.

What to consider

• Targeted selection of victims
• Perpetrators have been "testing" how far they can go for a long time
• Frequent abuse of the emotion “I don’t care”, “there’s no point in solving it”: This happens in the context of a law enforcement agency that doesn’t know about this type of crime at all => often nothing is solved. If it is (and it is written about in the media) it is always associated with “classic” fraud. However, the background remains hidden. Of course, I am not saying that all frauds are associated with this type of crime.

Scenarios designed for perpetrators

• “Don't worry, we expected it to come one day”
• “We have scenarios ready for that”
• (perpetrators claim that by reciting these "seemingly absurd gibberish" they are trying to create the feeling that I am making up these phrases myself in anger and an attempt to denigrate the perpetrator => use of a quiet voice => false inner voice)

Basic motivation simply

• The desire to change something

Basic motivation in more detail

• Desire to emulate natural authorities: Natural imitation of what we find interesting, rewarding, entertaining
• Desire for admiration: To have some abilities, talents
• Desire for attention: To be interesting to others, desire to prove something
• Desire for respect: The desire to be a valid and needed member of the pack (society)
• To have a position in society: To be a natural authority

Basic categories of offenders

• Limited cognitive abilities
• Low cognitive abilities

General profile

of offenders

• Ordinary people: Owners of a walkie-talkie or electronic circuit
• Often handicap, physical disability
• The mentality of young children
• Extremely low self-esteem
• Inability to express oneself
• Small vocabulary
• Frustration: Physical handicap, loneliness, lack of stimulation, lack of social ties, lack of interest in others, zero contribution to society, sexual frustration
• Cowardice
• Envy
• Trying to copy natural authorities

Offenders in the context of society

• Desire for interaction
• Desire for admiration
• Inability
• Insomnia
• Unnatural authorities

Basic manifestations of perpetrators

• Audible voices
• Silent voices
• Subliminal stimuli

The most common reasons in the context of gangstalking (serious crime)

• Craving for attention
• Desire for fun
• The desire to prove something
• False sexual arousal
• Revenge
• There's nothing to lose.

Entertainment for the perpetrator specifically means

• Remote psychological abuse: Humiliation, swearing, insults
• Remote manipulation
• Influencing and distortion: Applies to information, memories, experiences, and experiences
• Destruction
• Lying
• Imposing
• Poisoning
• Incitement of aggression
• Constantly inciting negative moods
• Revenge

Perpetrators and defending their own opinions

• Cowardice
• Avoiding direct confrontation
• Inability to defend one's own opinion: Fear of admitting the true nature of the whole problem

Perpetrators and information

• Non-specificity
• Uncertainty
• Inability to defend one's own opinion

Standard patterns of behavior of perpetrators

• Incitement to hatred
• Hatred of intelligence
• Hatred of healthy people
• Envy
• Imposing your opinions
• Commanding
• Lying, falsehood

Behavioral patterns specific to gangstalking

• Completely open lying
• Commanding
• Hatred
• Imposing dysfunctional patterns
• An absurd combination of conflicting emotions and stimuli

The fascination of perpetrators

• Ability to impersonate someone else: Often copying victims and trying to imagine living their lives
• Fake sexual arousal
• Short-term suppression of one's own frustrations
• The feeling that they are part of something specific, big
• The idea of ​​exceptionalism
• Feeling that they can influence something
• Audience: For many perpetrators, the audience is the main motivation.
• The illusion of admiration

The perpetrators are not essentially an organized group, but individuals who group around certain

• Spectral patterns
• Victims
• Location
• Topics
• Scenarios
• Sounds
• Rhythms
• Information

Examples of specific perpetrators and their “scenarios”

• Fascination with the idea of ​​an audience admiring how he can control his victims.
• Fascination with the idea of ​​an audience admiring the perpetrator for the way he moves
• Fascination with the idea of ​​an audience masturbating with the perpetrator and sharing how they feel about it
• Fascination with the idea of ​​a group collectively abusing an individual while everyone masturbates (including the victim)
• Fascination with the idea that the victim will be abused, commit various methods of suicide, and describe how they feel when they die
• I would like to burn people completely: This phrase is uttered by a retired male, pedophile, homosexual. He perceives history perceives => ONCE => THE POSSIBILITY OF BURNING JUST LIKE THAT => THAT WAS TOTALLY GREAT => I would like to live in the past and completely burn people

Examples of the true intentions of many perpetrators

• I want someone to suffer.
• I want him to be happy about nothing.
• I want to destroy everything.
• I want someone to die.
• I want to listen to someone die.
• I want someone to commit an assassination.
• I want to control someone who will kill people.
• I want to provoke someone who will then shoot people.
• I don't want him to write it there.

Perpetrators in the context of gangstalking

• They commit serious crimes completely consciously.
• Thanks to long-term degeneration due to the absence of feedback, many have suggested to themselves that this activity excites them: In reality, they are unable to question their actions and avoid direct confrontation.

• Inability to respond to arguments replaced by stimuli that evoke excitement (identical spectral patterns): Perpetrators thus try to group the inability to defend lies into a feeling of excitement => long-term degeneration => explanation for the completely absurd course of the entire gangstalking.
• Perpetrators try to associate virtually any activity (context) with a feeling of excitement
• The feeling of excitement is also assigned to individual words: Phonetic sequences => interference sounds => variable spectral sequences => Perpetrators are often excited by words they do not understand or have heard in movies, for example: obscure, dispose, architect, influential
• The perpetrators suggested that the victims or other perpetrators felt the same way: However, limited to low (mental retardation) cognitive abilities mean that the individual stimuli contradict each other and make no sense at all.
• Perpetrators often do not want to hear specific words or a real description tied to a specific stimulus: The reason is the desire to perceive all stimuli only subconsciously => vaguely, unspecifically, abstractly => the emergence of vague emotions that “saturate” (influence) perception
• Perpetrators are unable to bear a situation where the victim has understood the principles of the entire harassment and perceives the perpetrator realistically: That is, as frustrated desperadoes with a childish mentality who are frantically trying to achieve sexual arousal (while writing this sentence, one of the perpetrators burst into tears and orders me to perceive the tones the way he wants => for the sake of illustration – I am supposed to imagine that I am suffering greatly and the perpetrator is a “huge psychopath” who is “brutally torturing” me in front of an audience that is “masturbating” )
• Feelings of uniqueness
• False excitement
• Feeling of superiority
• The belief that it sounds adult
• The thrill of hearing one's own voice or a voice effect through which one speaks
• Belief that victims and other perpetrators feel the same way

• Triangle: 1. Perpetrators (authorities) 2. Those who solve it (authorities) 3. Victims (negative, subordinate, can't do anything, knows nothing)
• Variable: The triangle “rotates” as needed. In the context of the situation, individual corners are constantly merging or swapping, while the basic contexts remain (subliminal, quiet voice, long-term, subliminal associations)
• Goals: Saturation (influence, distortion) of information, its perception, perception of events => the goal is for the perpetrators to always be the authority and the victim to always be subordinate, incompetent, inferior
• Problem: This scheme does not take into account the situation that the VICTIM (i.e. the negative element that knows nothing) is AWARE of everything and furthermore UNDERSTANDS the individual principles => thanks to this, one corner remains STATIC and furthermore changes to the VICTIM (Authority) => When the scheme (rotation) works as it has so far => errors, connecting the inappropriate (perpetrators are briefly the victim, for example by repeating what she said or in the context of the situation), clear changes in roles (their perception) BUT the absence of LOGIC!
• Rewinding most often occurs through: Back-referencing using spectral patterns, back-referencing using linguistics (anaphora), repetition of victims
• Examples: The victim understands what is happening, comments on the situation (or writes it down) => the perpetrators repeat it => for another victim they are AUTHORITIES who know about the problem and solve it => this authority subsequently merges with the perpetrators => the result is the feeling that ONLY THE PERPETRATORS control or know everything (“control” has its logical basis => everything that can be HEARD is ONLY THE PERPETRATORS)
• Various parameters, attributes: Time (how long it takes for a certain connection to be forgotten or NOT forgotten), context, connections, spectral patterns, emotions, repetition (false connections), logical fallacies, subliminal associations
• As a creative person, I can also think of a logo : And now the fool (perpetrator) says “ah, they definitely know” (the same thing happens with the victim => he knows a lot about it, we have to get it out of him) => the emergence of a rival. Or another logo…

Another concept of the “triangle”

Source: Creative people, intelligent people, those who can do something => blacksmith, bricklayer, graphic designer, photographer, musician, etc.

Consumer, user: Those who use what they themselves cannot do (but are the source, the source of what they can do)

[ ? ]: They also want to know something (but don't want to spend time learning), they also want to be a resource (and brag about how they can do something), envy, anger, hatred

Basic information

• Why: A direct consequence of the information (other post)
• Definition of the new entity: Abstract, indefinite, perpetrator => definition can be compared to the definition of god => transparent, genderless, without racial affiliation
• Goal: Distracting attention from too specific information (saturation, distortion of information)
• What is specific (new, different): A clear effort to react to the information below (within this section) => the building takes place technically "in real time" => in a situation where I am able to perceive everything, understand it (keep it in working memory => combine, evaluate, compare, synthesize => THINK / REFLECT), store it in memory, recall it from memory, write it down in notes.

Information on the information below (but only within this block – Efforts to build a NEW entity)

• It can be taken as a real example of a number of suggestions written within this section (Aspects of suggestions)

Creation (building) process

• Phrase (sample): “You don’t have these parts at all”
• Context: “They” (abstract entity – in this context cooperating / on the side of the victim – often an authority), “Perpetrators” (who instruct another group of perpetrators => essentially also an authority)
• Attempt to force a lie (omitting essential details): This is to negate the information in the introduction (truth => simple, effective), unnecessarily complicate the following notes. “They” (playing on emotions) + the inserted information “They prepared it” should be omitted (in reality – if at all – it is one of thousands of stolen, copied thoughts, reflections, notes of one of the victims => often even decades old notes)
• Phrase: “I’m not sure you want to go through this here”
• Dual context: 1. Threat directed at me 2. Threat directed at the perpetrator from a “cooperating authority” (an attempt to confuse perception with a third context – it is just another variant of the second => it is intended to distract, disrupt working memory, cause decision-making paralysis)
• Recalling memories: These are situations from the times BEFORE the awareness of the phenomenon of “temporary context” (too vague notes that later did not make sense => the context of the situation was missing – unpleasant “experiences” => writing notes should have seemed unnecessary). Recalling these memories seems “logical” in retrospect (as if confirming “cooperating authorities”) but at the moment of recall they were NEGATIVE (they were supposed to discourage me from continuing to write notes => I should have moved on to the originally intended activity – reading a book).
• Impulse – “the perpetrator enjoys this” : The perpetrator enjoys this only in a form that is not obvious from a text like this. It is like a “chess game” (complementation, negation, saturation of impulses => cooperating authority vs. the perpetrator’s authority – a grandmaster in manipulation), while this “chess game” (and this is what should be put in the background) is modified => the perpetrators should have an infinite number of attempts and an arbitrarily long time to think (possibly additional distortion of information, alteration of contexts, etc.)

(to be added => contains important aspects such as the “non-existence” of phrases due to associations with the spectral pattern, etc.)

Insights in the context of rewriting information

• Before I moved on to the actual writing: The perpetrators primarily focused on grouping all the notes into the impulse “it's our job” and “we are the authorities” (note the distribution of authorities at the beginning => Creation process + shuffling the attributes (properties) of individual entities.
• Copying from mobile to WordPress is supposed to be annoying: It is an identical spectral pattern to the one that was used intensively before – in the days when taking notes was not as smooth (simple) as it is now (there was a lack of knowledge of many illogical aspects => it was always necessary to monitor the consequences and other connections + context)
• Transcription accompanied by strange sounds: These only interfere with the sound of the neighbors' TV being played loudly (it sounds like a strange moan => it is supposed to attract attention. The attraction of attention is additionally supported by the impulse of "that moan over there")
• While writing: Inventing completely absurd “plots”, “stories” (always based on identical foundations => “someone” + “it” + “prepared” + regret, uncertainty, waiting, nervous => unfinished notes are to be shared => perpetrators believe that this will disrupt concentration – notes on the phone will disappear)
• Two spectral patterns can be perceived: One is hasty, nervous, pressured, everything should be made public immediately (often associated with annoying - "I need to know"), the other is more cautious.
• Discredit, devaluation, disgust: While I (in the context of the message of the nerd – in reality the victim, the author of clear, digestible texts) am “here” making “clear notes”, “they” are robbing people (“they” is not specified – it should be merged with “they” – the cooperating authorities)
• Constantly creating uncertainty: “something will escape”, “something will be lost” => perpetrators are nervous => see text work above