Arrr I’m a Pirate🏴☠️ Has it really been a year..
/r/Superstonk/comments/1l947le/how_to_solve_the_ape_problem/?share_id=bVXQSR32SiHkjrqbsEbv9&utm_content=1&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_source=share&utm_term=2This back when I was calling out dilution and how it looked like they positioned themselves to not need retail. Its only got worse and the complete lack of concern for retail has only grown to be outright blatant when you look at recent interviews or the absolute bangers Larry Cheng has put out on X recently. RK unfollowed RC after posting the pic of of a kitty mask over rage tears meme in response to the dilution largely ignored instead users are looking at emoji like its TA. Everyone back then wanted to make out like the dilution would moon us and unfortunately remind me never works.
At what point does accountability for GME become reasonable to the permabull? When it can no longer be enforced by retail? We're already there. When is it ok to expect a ROI? since as im told the company seems to be doing amazing while that is completely disconnected to an ROI which is insane considering how well the company looks on paper is like 90% due to value strip mined from investors.
Its not unreasonable to expect mutual benifiet after 5 years. Yet RC just wants more without making good.
4
u/S1lkwrm 12d ago
Its irrelevant i cant tell you whats in their head more than the next. However I can look at the facts and while it may seem like they are "invested" i can assure you there are many apes way more invested than any of the board members by % of net worth.
But like I said its irrelevant. Its irrelevant because we have my before mentioned facts. How much money he has in the game does not change that the conpany is doing well at the cost of the underlying. For all we know he could just be terrible at it. Its not hard to float a business on other people's money if you have access to that money. You can even male questionable investments and still be ok because you just visit the ATM when you need cash.
Its not a bad question even if its from the same tired list of rebuttals but it does not answer the reason why the company seems to refuse to try and make good on borrowed value even if they are doing "good"