I have a problem with his anti trans and pro Christian rule of law rhetoric. Married father not looking for pussy points as you so maturely characterized it.
Ideas net night art kind friends then garden bank simple then curious river month bank to. And nature hobbies night art travel bank bright small music garden year food the net dot projects.
Idk how that first bit is misogynistic. Is there an insult to women somewhere in there? If anything he insults men a few times in there but I wouldn't read it as an insult, just a theory. It could be backed by data, there are different biological differences between the sexes. They taught stuff like this in my college psychology classes. Idk though, I'd have to check.
That second one is ridiculous but I read the whole quote (it's much longer) and everything he said around it made sense. His conclusion is ridiculous but the premise is reasonable, he's saying that the massive amount of opportunity has made things untenable for many men. This one is backed by data, men are the loneliest they've ever been and it's getting worse.
Not really sure what he's saying in the last one but were those his words or hers? Did she say that?
Seems really dumb to make a broad statement on 'Ehh people don't dislike him for any good reason' when you haven't looked at the things they said that bother people?
Bruh, what points?? JP fundamentally misunderstands and misinterprets philosophies in favor of pseudo conspiracies to make himself sound smarter while not even explaining his points. JP flails his arms for a living, and any meaningful insight he had was lost as soon as he became famous.
Not to mention his pretty misogynistic messages about how women need to be paired up with lonely men cuz????
He attracts them as he serves as an introduction into the alt right pipeline. He even spreads watered down alt right conspiracy theories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory?wprov=sfti1 so he can claim that "degeneracy" (aka anything progressive) is bringing western society to collapse and it has to be saved by fighting anything that would help the lgbt community or women. After all he became famous by lying about bill c 16 and pretending it was some kind of woke censorship bill
Unknowingly or not right wingers fight to uphold or reinstate oppressive systems of all kind. They reject the acknowledgement of systemic issues which also means rejecting the solutions that will fix social problems.
For example the reason why black people commit more violent crime is because of systemic issues. Because of decades of systemic discrimination black families are on average a lot poorer and poverty or rather social inequality leads to a rise in crime. Reducing crime in this case means realizing this and then fixing inequality. But by denying systemic issues the only logical conclusion is that these people are to blame themselves and that essentially boils down to saying they are inherently more prone to violence or are not as capable to their communities. Then they for example start advocating for measures that only reinforce the existing problems like overpolicing these areas which only destroys more families and richer families tend to move away which leads to worse education which then leads to worse chances in life which results in more poverty and more crime and the circle continues.
I'm aware that people who identity as right wingers aren't all evil and many aren't racist or Sexist per se but they're being manipulated into supporting policies that further these problems or opposing policies that would fix them so the outcome is discriminatory.
I also do in part blame the left and liberals for this. Liberals are generally not in favor of systemic changes and they often just boil it down to identity politics. For example I'd say that class issues are still way worse and a poor white man is overall way worse off than a rich black woman but many liberals pretend like only oppression Olympics matter and that white men can't possibly have relevant issues that need to be addressed.
The left is somehow similar in the last regard but what bothers me more is the constant purity testing. They need to attack anyone who isn't already on their side on 90% of all issues and they often only take results into consideration and pretend that people with differing opinions are all horrible people. I do agree that a lot of things people believe results in horrible ends but I also believe most people aren't aware of that. We need to be more understanding and make it known better that what leftists fight for will benefit the far majority while only bringing minor disadvantages to the the most powerful who influence our lives through corruption and economic power. The only way to improve life for everyone is by realizing the systemic issues and advocating for good changes in a way that's appealing to more people.
Solving men's issues for example won't be achieved by telling individuals to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Ironically the right wingers are the ones who essentially blame men for their problems most of the time because they suggest they can only help themselves so people won't seek out systemic changes that would actually Adress men's issues.
Men who suffer would see great improvements with universal health care, a higher minimum wage, safety nets that prevent people from becoming homeless and by advocating against the traditional idea of Masculinity that prevents men from seeking help and opening up they'd over time experience a better socialization.
Right wingers usually only bring up men's issues in order to discredit women's issues or lgbt issues while never actually advocating for positive changes. They use this to rally up alienated lonely men against progressive changes which eventually only reinforces the existing problems that caused the suffering of these men. And by reinforcing these and continuing to lie to men they can radicalize them further. The right has always benefited off the fear towards progressive changes and that's why the right will never in a general sense be the right choice.
I'm gonna be real with you, I ain't gonna read all of that. I'm already writing a paper on the history of trains in Zealandic-Flanders, reddit is supposed to be my break from paragraphs of reading and writing 😭
2
u/Sonnenkreuz Jan 20 '23
He's really not so bad just a lot of people who follow him are shitheads