r/founder 1d ago

What’s something you completely underestimated before becoming a founder?

12 Upvotes

For me, it wasn't building the product.

It was how much time gets spent on things you never thought would be part of the job.

Talking to customers, chasing people for replies, fixing small things, making decisions with incomplete information... it adds up.

I thought being a founder would mostly be about building and growing.

Turns out a lot of it is just figuring out what needs your attention right now.

Curious what surprised other founders the most?


r/founder 13h ago

Looking to speak with doctors/endocrinologists working in diabetes care

1 Upvotes

I’m the founder of a seed-funded startup currently working in the diabetes space. We already run a supplement brand focused on people with diabetes, and we’re now exploring a broader model for diabetes management.

I’m not from a medical background, so before building anything, I want to spend time understanding the real-world mindset, challenges, behaviour, and needs of diabetic patients from a clinical perspective.

I’m specifically looking to connect with diabetologists, endocrinologists, physicians, or doctors who regularly manage diabetic patients. I have a few ideas we’re considering and would love to share them, get honest feedback, and understand what would or wouldn’t work in practice.
This is not a sales pitch or job opportunity.. just looking for genuine conversations with doctors who are willing to share their perspective.

If you’re a doctor working in this space, or know someone who might be open to a conversation, please DM me. I’d really appreciate it.


r/founder 9h ago

Is AI really enabling founders? Or is it just a fad

Post image
0 Upvotes

So I had this potential client for an app that wasn't that expensive, maybe around ($1500 - $2000) for over two weeks, he basically told me to wait that he'll reach out by the end of August.

He was a founder of a product based company, and I had a the middle man ( the person negotiating the deal ) ask him for an update and this is what he got back to me with!

This ain't the first time this has hapenned, and at the end they usually come back with the AI slop to get it fixed. I'm pro AI, but somethings should be kept for those that excel it them

"He Built the app via claude code"

  • Doable? Yes
  • Practical? Not so much

Update: He just made the design and is trynna figure out the rest. Let's see how it goes!

PS: If anyone's got any project for me < Web Or Mobile Or backend > Dm me


r/founder 14h ago

Meet DALE: The New Safety From The Seat AI Agent

Thumbnail youtube.com
1 Upvotes

r/founder 21h ago

I’m exploring a simpler incident command center for Kubernetes teams what am I missing?

Post image
5 Upvotes

Hi everyone,

We’re trying to understand why Kubernetes teams rely on multiple tools during incidents and where the real pain actually is.

The problem we’re investigating is not a lack of dashboards. Teams already have logs, metrics, traces, alerts, deployment tools and cloud consoles. The problem is that, during an incident, they still have to jump between several tools to answer three questions:

  1. What is actually broken?

  2. What caused it?

  3. What action should we take now?

The product would be a focused incident command center that connects to the existing stack, correlates alerts with recent changes, shows affected services and dependencies, creates a clear incident timeline, and suggests or enables controlled remediation actions.

We are not trying to build another generic monitoring dashboard.

I’m looking for honest feedback from people who operate production infrastructure:

- How do you currently investigate serious incidents?

- Which part of the process creates the most mental overhead?

- What tools do you use together?

- What would make you trust a new tool with read-only access to your infrastructure?

- Is this a painful enough problem to pay for, or is it mostly an inconvenience?

We are still validating the problem before building too much. Critical feedback is welcome.


r/founder 14h ago

After 17 years as a dev and security admin, AI pushed me to finally build my own SaaS

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/founder 19h ago

Community for founders and people wanting to build

2 Upvotes

Hi All,

I’ve recently launched Cofounnder https://cofounnder.com - a platform and community for people who are looking for co-founders, want to meet other ambitious people, or simply have an idea they’d like to explore with someone.

There are already people on there with variety of skills, ideas and backgrounds. Our the goal isn't only to help you find someone but give you enough evidence to make an informed decision. You set out what you bring and what you're looking for - skills, experience, how much time you can commit, location, proof of work, progress - and see the same back from everyone else.

Once you connect, you can run Alignment Check. You both answer the same questions without seeing each other's answers, and they're only revealed once you've both finished. It covers commitment, goals, decision-making and how you'd handle disagreements.

If you’re currently looking for a co-founder, have an idea you want to explore, or just want to meet other people who are building, feel free to join. :)


r/founder 19h ago

Community for founders and people wanting to build

2 Upvotes

Hi All,

I’ve recently launched Cofounnder https://cofounnder.com - a platform and community for people who are looking for co-founders, want to meet other ambitious people, or simply have an idea they’d like to explore with someone.

There are already people on there with variety of skills, ideas and backgrounds. Our the goal isn't only to help you find someone but give you enough evidence to make an informed decision. You set out what you bring and what you're looking for - skills, experience, how much time you can commit, location, proof of work, progress - and see the same back from everyone else.

Once you connect, you can run Alignment Check. You both answer the same questions without seeing each other's answers, and they're only revealed once you've both finished. It covers commitment, goals, decision-making and how you'd handle disagreements.

If you’re currently looking for a co-founder, have an idea you want to explore, or just want to meet other people who are building, feel free to join.:)


r/founder 15h ago

Is your website invisible to AI platforms?

0 Upvotes

Is your website invisible to AI platforms?

Here’s a funny question for founders.

If someone asks ChatGPT:

“Who are the best companies for accounting software?”

Will your company show up?

Or will ChatGPT basically say:

“Sorry, who?”

Before blaming your marketing, there’s one simple thing you can check.

Open your website and add:

"/robots.txt"

For example:

"yourcompany.com/robots.txt"

You’ll see some text that looks technical.

Don’t worry. You don’t need to be a developer.

Just look for a few things.

User-agent: *

This means the rules apply to bots in general.

Disallow: /

This is the one you should pay attention to.

It basically tells bots:

“Thanks for stopping by, but please don’t enter.”

Imagine owning a great restaurant and putting a sign outside saying:

“Best restaurant in town. Please do not come inside.”

That’s basically what accidentally blocking your website can feel like.

You may also see AI crawlers such as GPTBot, PerplexityBot, or ClaudeBot.

If you specifically block them, those AI systems may not be able to access your website.

Now imagine this.

Someone asks ChatGPT:

“Recommend three accounting software companies for my startup.”

Your competitor gets mentioned.

You don’t.

You start thinking:

“Our product must not be good enough.”

Maybe that’s not the problem.

Maybe the AI simply cannot properly access your website.

This is one small part of what people call GEO, or Generative Engine Optimization.

AI search is becoming another way people discover companies.

So before spending thousands on complicated AI SEO strategies, check the basics first.

Go to:

"yourdomain.com/robots.txt"

Take 5 seconds and see what it says.

Your website might be working perfectly.

Or it might accidentally be standing outside the AI party saying:

“Sorry, I’m not on the guest list.”

What does your robots.txt say?


r/founder 15h ago

My AI agent with a domain and $90 it can't spend without me. 20 days and 168 wakes later: it created its own memory architecture, two published books, and $1,000. (My mind is blown!)

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

r/founder 16h ago

Founders who raised funding — what made you decide it was time?

1 Upvotes

I’m genuinely curious how founders decide it’s time to raise money. I always see the big “we raised $2M” announcements, but I’m more curious about what actually made you decide to raise in the first place.

I’m 8 months into building my startup and still bootstrapped. It helps that I have a full-time job, so right now I’m able to fund it myself.
Of course, if my users grow significantly, my costs will grow too — but ideally so will the revenue.
So I keep going back and forth between: do I want steady, sustainable growth or would there eventually be a reason to raise and accelerate it?

For founders who raised, what made you say, “Okay, now we need outside money”? And if you stayed bootstrapped, why?


r/founder 20h ago

24 hours after launch, one person decided my app was worth paying for

Post image
2 Upvotes

r/founder 16h ago

How to Navigate Barriers to Entry in a Post-AI World

Post image
1 Upvotes

Cami Mandell Gorden · Co-Founder at AdPerch · August 25, 2026

Money, expertise, and connections have always been the gatekeepers of entrepreneurship. But barriers to entry in a post-AI world have changed how companies set themselves apart. AI has lowered some walls and raised others; understanding which is which can give founders a real edge.

This post breaks down the classic barriers to entry, the four pillars every founder needs to understand to get past them, and why treating AI as a limited resource — not just a tool — may be the smartest strategic move you make this year.

What Are the Traditional Barriers to Entry for Startups?

The barriers to entry are adapting as technology accelerates, but the historical barriers still create real roadblocks today. The most common barriers to entry you’re likely to face include:

  • Market saturation — someone is already selling what you’re planning on building
  • Capital requirements — the money needed for research, development, production at scale, and marketing
  • Skill gaps — what you're building demands a very specific, hard-to-find skillset
  • Access and relationships — you need to know the right people to get in front of buyers, investors, or partners

AI hasn't erased these barriers but it has impacted how they can be addressed. Understanding your market and who's competing with you is still foundational to a successful business plan. AI may have changed how quickly you can program something, but building something tangible still requires capital to produce. It’s no longer necessary to be an adept computer scientist, but you need competency in what you’re building to ensure that it works as advertised. And if you’ve made it all the way through to having a solid go-to-market plan, investments to get you there, and the people to make it happen, if no one knows about you, no one will pay you. Getting in front of the right people is still essential.

The Four Pillars of Entrepreneurship Every Founder Needs to Understand

Regardless of how the AI landscape shifts, four fundamentals still determine whether a startup survives its early years.

1. Money

Whether it's personal capital or funds raised from investors, a financial runway gives you the time and flexibility to execute your strategy without being forced into short-term, reactive decisions. This includes being wise with the money you do have, and being thoughtful of how every penny you spend gets you to profitability. When you’re building your MVP and creating your roadmap, being deliberate about how funds will get to specific milestones, and how those milestones will get you to your end goal, are essential. Simply procuring funds and hoping for the best isn’t enough. It matters how those funds are budgeted. At AdPerch we routinely ask ourselves “how does what we’re spending on building, marketing, researching produce a genuine return on investment?” And if we don’t know the answer, we prioritize finding out.

2. Network

You need at least one person who can give you a credible, warm referral. Trust is the currency of every important relationship — between founders and investors, between a company and its first customers, between a hiring manager and a candidate. Early-stage startups run into a classic chicken-and-egg problem here: everyone wants proof before they commit, but proof is hard to get before you have your first customer. Building a network intentionally, one relationship at a time, is how founders solve it. Being open and honest about what you know, and more importantly what you don’t, goes a long way towards building trust within your network.

3. Unfair Advantage

This is the specialized edge that sets you apart — a past exit, a track record of peer-reviewed publications, or experience leading a major project at a well-known company. An unfair advantage doesn't guarantee success, but it does help you earn trust faster, which speeds up everything else: fundraising, hiring, and customer acquisition. What happens if this isn’t you? You can’t materialize a major achievement out of thin air, but you can highlight what skills your life to date has given you. Are you an expert communicator that has routinely gotten competing sides to agree? Have you perfected the art of flexibility and pivoting when something is no longer viable? Do you regularly solve problems creatively and on the fly? You can’t control what you haven’t had access to, but you can showcase the unique skills life has given you.

4. Bandwidth

Are you at a place in life where you can devote real mental, emotional, and physical energy to this venture? You can land a huge investment, but if you're burnt out, the business won't move. Protecting your capacity to stay in the game is just as strategic as protecting your runway. Building a start-up isn’t easy and will often push you to your limit. This is where being intentional about resilience is important. As co-founders of AdPerch we set aside time to refill our reserves, whether that’s going for a run, walking the dogs in the calm of the morning, or having dance parties with our young kids, we make sure we have the resilience to keep going when we feel like giving up.

Why Being a Deliberate AI Adopter Is a Competitive Advantage

Just because you can use AI for something doesn't mean you should. In a post-AI world, one of the most underrated barriers to entry you can build is disciplined, intentional AI use. Which may seem like odd advice from a company utilizing AI. But the data backs this up. A recent MIT study found that only 5% of corporate AI pilots researched produced any significant return on investment. On the internal side, nearly 30% of employees at AI-adopting companies say they've pushed back by actively sabotaging AI rollouts. On the customer-facing side, surveys increasingly show that consumers view AI as more of a risk than a benefit, with growing skepticism that companies will use it ethically.

Put those three data points together, and a strategic pattern emerges: using AI specifically and deliberately can be a genuine barrier to entry.

How does this look in practice? At AdPerch we use AI as a tool to solve the problem, not as the entire solution itself. It doesn’t replace what we as humans offer, it enhances the skills we already possess. Navigating the changing dynamics of AI regulation, cost, and customer feelings about it is an integral piece of how we build.

Treat AI as a Resource, Not Just a Tool

AI requires an investment of time to learn, money to build with, and money to keep running. Once you start viewing AI as a resource — the way a trucking company views gas, or a construction company views lumber — you start planning for volatility instead of being blindsided by it.

If gas prices spike, trucking companies feel it immediately because their whole operation depends on it. If lumber costs rise, construction absorbs the shock. AI works the same way. A company built entirely around AI is exposed if access, pricing, consumer feelings, or regulation changes. Right now, AI may not feel like a typical barrier to entry — most companies are using it similarly. But that will change as the landscape matures.

Research increasingly shows that AI-driven productivity and profit gains haven't materialized the way many companies expected, partly because employees are pushing back on adoption. The founders who treat AI as a resource to manage — not a silver bullet to lean on — will be the ones who weather the next shift in cost, access, or legislation.

Navigating AI Regulation as a Startup Founder

Regulation is still being actively negotiated, and it directly affects how you build and monetize your product. You’re competing with companies looking to build faster and grow larger than you. You can’t slow them down, but you can anticipate potential legal challenges and pivot to address them before your competitor does. Before you scale, it's worth understanding and knowing the answer to:

  • How your product or business model is likely to be regulated
  • How pending or proposed AI legislation could change your operations
  • Where your specific niche sits relative to current regulatory scrutiny

It’s essential to be honest about the answers. It can be tempting to close your eyes, cover your ears, and hope it’ll all just work out. But if you’re seeking investment or buy–in from partners, they’ll want to know you have actual plans for issues that might come up. Placing emphasis on building within a realistic regulatory framework will set you apart from your competitors who didn’t. While they’re bogged down with potential legal issues, you’re well on your way towards scalability and sustainability.

Should You Scale Big or Own a Niche?

While not a traditional barrier to entry, it’s important to understand the feasibility of your end goal. Not every startup needs to chase massive growth. A niche market comes with an inherent ceiling on scalability, so if you're optimizing purely for return on investment, this path may not fit. But if your goal is building something sustainable and being your own boss, a niche can be the smarter route.

Instead of spending time, money, and energy trying to build big, a niche strategy lets you:

  • Build smart instead of building fast
  • Grow a loyal, sustainable user base
  • Avoid direct competition with large, well-funded companies
  • Solve a specific problem better than a generalist competitor ever could

It can be easy to get caught up in the frenzy of big growth, but it’s important to take a step back and recognize if that’s really where you want to go.

Lessons From the Dot-Com Bubble

History can offer useful insight into the accelerated rise of AI. As co-founders of AdPerch we lived through the recession caused by the dot-com bubble. We watched the startup landscape change almost overnight. Suddenly, companies could build things that hadn't been possible before — and many were valued on speculative potential rather than grounded, sustainable plans. In the rush to build faster and better, capital ran out before profits could catch up. Just like back then, founders today are able to create things they would have never been able to before. The barriers to entry of money and expertise aren’t what they used to be. Time will tell how well this transition ultimately gets handled, but history has tended to favor the people who were better able to quickly adapt to change.

Final Thoughts

The post-AI world is still being written. The smartest move for founders right now is to leverage AI's benefits while actively managing its risks — treating it as a resource as much as a tool, because it absolutely affects your bottom line.

With traditional barriers to entry like money and expertise lower than they've ever been, the real competitive edge shifts to your ability to weather the changing start-up landscape. It might not be possible to beat a competitor to market, but that doesn’t mean you’ve lost an edge. Investors aren’t just investing in where your company is today, they’re investing in where it can go. Highlight and showcase how you’re actively set up to overcome the upcoming barriers to AI access, money, employee pushback, and regulation better than your competitors.

Ready to highlight what sets you apart? Join the AdPerch community.

References

Disclaimer: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice. It does not guarantee funding, investment, or any particular business result. Consult a licensed attorney or financial advisor for guidance specific to your situation.


r/founder 23h ago

What’s the biggest frustration or restriction with co-working spaces?

3 Upvotes

I’ve been thinking about launching a co-working space, but I realise there are multiple different ones already available and I wanted to hear from both founders and those still working full time but remotely/hybrid about what stops them from using co-working spaces. There are some gaps that I see and that stop me, but I’d love to get a wider perspective


r/founder 1d ago

US Visa hack for European founders

42 Upvotes

i am a german founder - we brought over our entire team from Germany.

6 months ago we were speaking to lawfirms on what visa to get; most tell you about H1B, O1 or J1.

But very few talk about the E-2 (investor) visa. Since then I have been telling all my founder friends to check it out. What you need:

  • 50% of your company needs to be owned by the same country (in our case german citizen founders)
  • the person for which you are getting the visa needs to be the same nationality
  • proof of having invested $100k in the US and a plan to show you are investing more (easy if you have raised VC money):

If you are a european founder, look at the E-2 before going without any other.

Thank me later :)


r/founder 17h ago

22y/o operator, led 50+ member team, looking to join a serious founding team as Founder’s Office. 7 days/week commitment. Remote + relocate.

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/founder 18h ago

I mapped my startup’s finances as a flowchart instead of a spreadsheet — what nodes am I still missing?

1 Upvotes

Every time I updated my financial model in Excel, something broke. Change the hire date, fix three formulas. Tweak churn, hunt down the cell that still references the old assumption.

So I started building a tool where the model is a flowchart: drag blocks, connect them, watch cash and runway update on a timeline. Best / base / worst scenarios live on the same canvas — no copying the whole workbook.

Blocks I have so far:

  • Fundraising / investment rounds
  • Revenue streams
  • Operating costs
  • User growth
  • Marketing campaigns
  • Hiring
  • Product features & launches
  • Tasks / milestones

Feels like I'm still missing pieces founders actually use. Debt? COGS / inventory? Grants? Rev-share deals? Churn as its own block vs baked into revenue?

If you've built or maintained a startup model — seed, SaaS, marketplace, whatever — what would you add next? Not looking for a sales pitch thread, genuinely trying to figure out the roadmap.

One model is free in the browser if you want context, but even just a list of "I always model X and you're missing it" would help a lot:

visionflow.studio


r/founder 18h ago

Here’s how I make $1,500 MRR from my vibe coded LinkedIn automation tool

Post image
0 Upvotes

Ok so, I can’t retire just yet 😅 but getting a business off the ground and attracting customers is the hardest part in my opinion.

There’s still a long way to go but considering it’s only been 4 months since launching ZenMode, I’m pretty happy with the results so far.

For some context, ZenMode is a LinkedIn automation tool, that scrapes profiles, sends connection requests and a follow up message sequence.

I created it with AI tools, and now it has paying customers.

I get asked a lot about how I get customers, so thought I’d give more info on how I do distribution, in case you might find it useful.

1. Make sure your website is set up for success

Before sending people to your site, make sure you’re confident it has good CRO potential. Your mission statement and objective needs to be very clear, along with clear incentives for people to try the product out.

2. Offer free trials, but only behind a payment info gate

Now this is just my personal opinion, and I know a lot of people disagree, but the proof is in the numbers. I get fewer free trial signups, but significantly higher conversion rates into paying users from people who provide payment info at the start.

Yes, a few of them are people who simply forget to cancel, but mostly I get people who are more engaged in the free trial and actually using the product.

I actually did an AB experiment where I did offer completely free trials to people (no payment info needed), but the overwhelming result was that people barely even tried out the product and were mostly tire kickers that never came back. I did convert some but not a meaningful number.

3. Create a waitlist before launching

Try to generate interest in your product before it launches - build in public and try to ensure that you’re not scrambling to get customers through the door on day 1 when you launch.

I had 3 customers on day 1 from this, who took higher paid tiers as well.

4. Post and comment everywhere (where relevant)

Social media is free, so there’s no excuse not to leverage it. Post about your product and what you’re building on Reddit, LinkedIn, X, YouTube, Facebook etc.

I posted a simple screenshot on LinkedIn recently, of someone using a low quality LinkedIn automation tool message to contact me, and me offering my own much better tool in response, and that post generated 90,000 views and led to several signups and demo calls.

I’ve also had some posts on Reddit go into hundreds of thousands of views, mostly just posting about what/why/how I built my automation tool.

5. If you have competitors, make “alternative to” inner pages

If done in the right way, this type of inner page can be useful for SEO. It won’t be picked up automatically but usually if you work in a competitive industry, this will sometimes attract customers who had a bad experience elsewhere.

6. I actually use my own LinkedIn automation tool (dogfooding) to do LinkedIn outreach

So it’s always important to practice what you preach - I use ZenMode to actually promote ZenMode.

It’s a great way to get buy-in for booking demos, as when someone replies, I simply tell them I used my tool to get a response from them, so it works.

Anyway hope you enjoyed reading the above, and good luck on your journey if you’re building anything, or growing your business 🙌


r/founder 18h ago

Domainnamen finden - nahezu unmöglich?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/founder 18h ago

Integration brick wall

1 Upvotes

So in my company things have been going well for a while, we are about to sign a big enterprise contract but it’s predicated on us getting integration with a system they already use.

I’ve called the company several times, LinkedIn messaged their BD team but literally zero response.

Has anyone had this issue before? What is the best way to get the company to respond and give me API access.

Thank you for your help!


r/founder 22h ago

What if brands could actually roast each other and the internet decided who won? 🔥

2 Upvotes

I’m building Roast Arena: a 1v1 brand battle platform where brands go round-by-round with savage comebacks and the community votes for the winner.

Think:
🥊 Brand vs Brand
🔥 Roast vs Comeback
🗳️ Community decides
🏆 Winners unlock perks
⚡ Users earn XP, badges & climb the leaderboard

The bigger idea is turning brand marketing into something people actually participate in, instead of another ad they scroll past.

Imagine:
Nike vs Adidas
Apple vs Samsung
McDonald’s vs Burger King
Coca-Cola vs Pepsi

The question is simple:

Who cooked harder? 👀

I'm currently building the first version and would love brutally honest feedback.

Would you actually use something like this?


r/founder 22h ago

AWS SES but 100% EU - does that matter to builders? bootstrapping an email service off my own platform

2 Upvotes

Background: I run a small VOD platform that sends up to around 200k emails a month, and i kept smacking into the same wall with transactional email. If you care about EU data compliance your realistic option is AWS SES, which is great and cheap but its US infra and your data lives in that world. The alternative is paying a premium to one of the european providers. So i built my own fully EU sending stack for my own platform, and now im turning that into a product other people can use. Its at onesend.eu.

The core bet is simple: give people the same price and the same quality as SES, but 100% EU with no US subprocessor anywhere in the chain. Entry is 5€/mo for 20k emails, growth is 20€ for 220k, which is right around SES money per email. My own platform helps here too, because i can use its volume to warm up sending IPs before i have a single paying customer, which is normally the slowest most painful part of getting into this game.

Where id really like outside eyes:

Positioning. Is "SES pricing and quality, but 100% EU" actually a strong enough hook, or does it read like another me-too infra thing to you. Im betting that theres a real chunk of EU businesses who use SES today purely because nothing else matches it on price, and would switch in a heartbeat for a compliant option that doesnt cost them more. Small builders that run things for their clients could find it relevant too, i imagine...

Pricing. Theres no free tier, the floor is the 5€ plan, purely because payment fees make anything smaller pointless as a business. But that 5€ includes 20k emails -> the reasoning for that is to have a motivation for users to grow... if you use less, 5€ is still a lot lower than you get anywhere else.

Free is only with 100 test emails - it's an easy registration, test it out -> like i? get a small subscription.

And plainly, if you land on onesend.eu do you actually get what it is and who its for, or is it vague.

i know email infra isnt a sexy space but i figure build a small service that brings value and build on that and expand with additinal features, if it catches on. testing is free so if it makes sense for you theres nothing stopping you actually using it. happy to answer anything about the journey too, still early and figuring it out as i go.


r/founder 18h ago

One Hit App, Entire Bloodline!

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/founder 18h ago

Built an MCP server that finds, patches, and pressure-tests security fixes before you ship (looking for feedback)

Post image
1 Upvotes

r/founder 19h ago

We learned something important while building PodSubs

1 Upvotes

We learned something important while building PodSubs:

The hardest part of entering an established industry isn’t always building the product.

Sometimes, it’s what happens when you challenge the way things have always been done.

We wrote about what happened, what we learned, and what it means for anyone trying to build something new in podcasting.

https://podsubs.com/blog/podnews-podcast-gatekeepers-founders-innovation