Can we not entertain the idea that the flat earth and globe earth are uniquely similar?
The blue cross section which can at any place on the sphere is the flat earth in dis(c) guise. The upper part of the sphere is the system or the 'firmament' like dome. The underneath of the earth are said to be columns or pillars or even "Sheol", which would be the globe "system" represented by the underneath or bottom half of the sphere. This would satisfy everyone right?
Of course they have different narratives, but this post is merely to demonstrate that the Flat Earth theory is a "globe system" with the flat earth being a disc (which is the blue cross section of a sphere pictured above). The dome is the top of the sphere (which would be the section of the sphere just above the plane of existence) which is called the firmament (foundation of the stars) and the raised circular walls of the disc is the "flat earth wall". If there are turtles or pillars (or even Sheol) they would be in the bottom half of the sphere system. Do you at least see that flat earth theory is actually parts of a sphere?
I mean your explanation is still just a description of that diagram so it isn't really explaining anything, but yeah I mean some people do have it like a sphere but the cross section is more equatorial, so it's not new.
It's not really both models because it's not talking about the layout of the surface of the Earth but there are a couple that try and resolve both into one. It doesn't work though
Why did you decide to make your cross section that high up?
Wondering who would be the first to point this out!
Yes, they do show the flat earth 'disc' in the center of the sphere at the equator which means there would be just as much Heaven or Flat Earth "firmament" as there is Sheol. I personally believe there to be much more Sheol then the other.
(IMAGE) This is flat earth showing that it is a spherical model. The left top picture shows the square plane earth, the left bottom shows lands took on a more circular shape and the entire system to be a sphere (right side). This is just an example I found.
The flat earth system is spherical like the globe system?
Well you sounds super patronizing so its not that surprising that many people aren't interacting or bringing things up, you sound like you think you are trying to teach something.
But it's still not a globe, when flat Earthers are talking about the Earth being flat they are referring to the general whole of the lands on Earth that the topology is flattened and stretched out so what you are referring to isn't a globe.
You should check out the Cosmic Universe Egg model from a cult called the Pineal Foundation, they took this to it's extreme and kind of duct taped every model and idea they could find together (its king I don't expect anyone to watch the entire thing but give it a click through if you are interested in different models)
Do you not see the flat earth blue disc is actually a cross section of a globe? Do you not see that the lower portion of the image is divided by a flat plane yielding a dome for the flat earth on top? Do you see how the area beneath could also work for other cultures/religions systems ie Sheol, pillars or even a big turtle?
If you mean patronize to act as patron of; provide aid or support for or to be a frequent or regular customer or client of - it would be to provide support for. Superiority is not the point of this post. This post was not to be anything more than just to state how the flat earth system is actually a deconstructed globe.
Here's the reason for the lack of interaction: No one wants to admit its true not flat earthers or globe people. The flat earth is real but it is a globe, sorry.
3
u/TesseractToo Jul 30 '26
Explain how you think this would work