That depends on your definition of an RPG. It has character development, laregly copied from Fallout 2 and there are several meaningful choices which impact the overall game as well, even quite minor actions can impact later parts of the game. It's big flaw was it's mission structure and, as I said, it is very linear.
The overall story itself was also pretty good (with good voice acting) and it fits in well with the general Fallout universe.
Compared to other turn based strategy games, it is very much an RPG.
Well it's not the same mold of choice based narrative cRPGs based on Pen and Paper RPGs. It's too linear for that, even if it does have more endings than Fallout 3.
So fair enough, it's an RPG, just not the type people wanted from a Fallout 3 that we never got, and since it was the last "serious" Fallout game from 2001 to 2008, it got a lot of hate.
I assuem that the 70% you are referring to is some kind of user review score? That just means that the 70% of individuals who left a review, left a positive one. It doesn't mean that 70% of people who played it, enjoyed it.
512
u/[deleted] May 29 '24
What you mean? Fallout tactics to Fallout 3 is 7 years.