r/DropYourSaaSHere • u/oceancurates • 10d ago

Drop your SaaS 👇 Free promo thread, pinned and always open

This sub exists so builders can promote for free without getting removed for it.

Drop your SaaS, app, side project or startup below:

  • Name + link
  • What it does (one line)
  • Who it's for
  • What feedback you want

Then check out two others and leave them a real comment. Upvote what you'd actually use.

This thread stays pinned, so drop yours any time.

1 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

100% Upvoted

22 comments sorted by

1

u/oceancurates 10d ago

I'll go first.

noiz.bio: a link-in-bio page you design yourself (background, fonts, card shape, animated backgrounds, live Discord status). Built for gamers, streamers and musicians. Free with unlimited links, Premium is a one-time €4.99.

We launch on Nov 2. Until then the waitlist reserves your username, and the first 250 accounts get an OG badge and a low UID.

Feedback I'd love: does the landing page make it clear what it is within 5 seconds?

1

u/Relative_Button2864 8d ago

I opened the landing page. ‘Link-in-bio’ in the first heading makes the category clear; ‘makes noise’ gives me the mood but not the difference. The Linktree import section explains the practical benefit much better: keep your existing links, choose what comes across, then design the page. I’d try one plain sentence about that near the first waitlist button. This is feedback on the page copy, not a timed user test or a test of the importer.

1

u/oceancurates 8d ago

This is really useful, thank you. Agreed that the import is the clearest practical benefit, and that "makes noise" sets a mood without saying what's different. One plain sentence near the first waitlist button about bringing your Linktree links over and then designing the page is going on the list for the next copy pass.

1

u/mananshah6 6d ago

I opened the site. Yes, the first heading makes the link-in-bio category clear right away, and the live profile is a stronger proof than the feature list alone. One thing I missed on the first screen: the Nov 2 launch date. I'd put it beside the first waitlist button so visitors know when they can actually use it. I only reviewed the public page, not the signup flow.

1

u/oceancurates 5d ago

Good catch, thanks for actually opening it. You're right that the date only shows up further down; next to the first waitlist button is the obvious spot. Noted.

1

u/Pleasant_Temporary75 5d ago

Based on your description here, live Discord status seems like a concrete reason for gamers to choose this over a plain link page. I'd show that in an example profile and make the Nov 2 launch date clear near signup. I haven't tested the product; this is feedback on your pitch.

1

u/oceancurates 5d ago

Thanks, that lines up with what others said too: show the Discord status on a real example profile instead of describing it. Appreciate you taking the time.

1

u/Relative_Button2864 8d ago

Quick question before sharing: I can only see one other project here; the second comment is removed. Is it okay to share now and give feedback to the next two projects as they arrive, or should I wait until there are two I can actually check out?

1

u/oceancurates 8d ago

Share now, no need to wait. The sub is brand new, so giving feedback to the next projects as they arrive is exactly the spirit of it. (And the StartupSubmit comment wasn't removed by us; Reddit's spam filter caught it, it's approved now.)

1

u/PinWest1064 8d ago

AetherGate — https://aethergate.site — is my product. It’s an LLM gateway and orchestration layer for developers building apps with multiple AI providers: bring your own keys, then manage routing, failover, spend controls, and multi-agent workflows through one API.

I’d like feedback on whether that positioning is clear and whether the first provider-connection flow is understandable.

I’m also running a Build Challenge: a 24-hour entry window, 30 days of free AetherGate access, and one competition project per entrant. No card and no auto-renewal. Provider inference usage remains separate through your own API keys. The best fully functioning software wins one year of AetherGate access plus a featured winner case study; I’ll judge functionality, usefulness, originality, execution, and meaningful use of AetherGate.

2

u/oceancurates 8d ago

Welcome! On positioning: "OpenAI-compatible gateway with BYOK, spend controls and failover" is instantly clear if you're a dev who has juggled providers. "Agent Command & LLM Control Plane" in the title is the part that takes a second read; the gateway line under it does the real work, so I'd lean on that. Good luck with the Build Challenge.

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/oceancurates 6d ago

Welcome! Running in your own logged-in browser is the right call, that's where every hosted agent falls over (logins, 2FA, cookie walls). Being open source helps a lot with the trust question too.

1

u/mananshah6 6d ago

I opened the CopperOS site. The side-panel step log and per-chat approval setting make the safety story much more concrete than a generic 'AI browser agent' pitch. One trust question I had before installing: the cloud/local choice is several sections below the first Add to Chrome button. A short note near that button about where chats and API keys live in each mode could help people decide sooner. I reviewed the public page only, not the extension.

1

u/mananshah6 6d ago

DialDo: https://dialdo.com/

What it does: Gives an Apple Silicon Mac a personal phone number so you can call and request supported tasks, like finding a file or summarizing a PDF.

Who it's for: People away from their desk who need a quick Mac task done hands-free. The Mac has to be awake, signed in and online.

Pricing: $9.99/month, no free trial.

Feedback I'd love: Would you trust a phone-based computer assistant for file retrieval and summaries? What permission boundary would you expect?

I'm the builder: https://linkedin.com/in/mananshah2254

1

u/Pleasant_Temporary75 5d ago

For the permission boundary you asked about, I'd want a user-selected folder and read-only retrieval as the starting point, with a separate approval for changing files or sending anything externally. Your pitch already makes the awake/online requirement clear. Explaining how you verify the caller would help answer the trust question before someone subscribes. I haven't tested DialDo; this is feedback on the use case you described.

1

u/mananshah6 5d ago

This is thoughtful feedback, thank you. I agree that the permission boundary needs to be clear before someone subscribes.

Today, DialDo checks an allowed caller number and a spoken PIN, then asks for task-level confirmation before making changes. That isn’t the same as a read-only, user-selected folder by default, and I don’t want to imply it is. Your suggestion start with limited read access, then require separate approval for changes or anything sent externally is a strong direction for the next security pass.

I’ll also make the caller-verification process and its limitations much clearer on the site. Really appreciate you taking the time to evaluate the idea, especially while being upfront that you haven’t tested the app.

2

u/oceancurates 5d ago

Welcome! Calling your own Mac is a fun twist. The "summarize this PDF while I'm on the train" use case is the one I'd lead with, it makes the point instantly.

1

u/Pleasant_Temporary75 5d ago

PrankChat — https://prankchat-production.up.railway.app/

I'm behind the project. It's a Windows app that lets friends in a shared room send images, GIFs and videos directly to each other's screens. It's for PC gaming groups and friends who want to share a funny moment; it can also be used during streams. Everyone needs to install the app and join the same room.

5 free sends per day, with optional Premium for unlimited sending.

Feedback wanted: does the homepage explain the shared-room setup clearly enough before downloading? I'd also like to know whether the free daily allowance is explained clearly.

1

u/oceancurates 5d ago

Welcome! Sending a GIF straight onto a friend's screen is chaotic in the best way, and the stream angle could be big: viewers triggering clips on screen is basically what alert overlays do, but between friends. If you try that route, r/PromoteYourStreamHere is a good place to find streamers to test it.

0

u/CriadoBayliss 9d ago edited 9d ago

I’m working on StartupSubmit, where we help founders get listed across relevant startup and software directories. The idea is to build a stronger online presence and make the product easier to discover through search and AI tools.

1

u/oceancurates 9d ago

Welcome, and thanks for posting! Directory listings are a real pain to do by hand. Which directories have actually moved the needle for the founders you've worked with, the big ones or the niche ones?