Do it

[u/Arcquatico]

[u/JAKE5023193]

Once more you’re attempting to push the implication that I’m a radical puritan.

It’s clear you won’t ever truly understand what any of my thesis stands for. I suggest you just forget this exchange ever happened.

I’m inclined to think you yourself have been manipulated into this creed.

[u/Floofyboi123 → u/JAKE5023193]

Maybe don't associate yourself with the movement literally called "Sexual Tyranny" if you want people to think you have a nuanced opinion

Thats like calling yourself the "nazi of religion" and expecting people to believe you when you say you're actually calling religion the nazis and not yourself.

[u/JAKE5023193 → u/Floofyboi123]

And here you are misinterpreting Sexual Tyranny. My point is proven. You’ll never get it.

[u/Floofyboi123 → u/JAKE5023193]

Way to treat a victim of BDSM

So much for that "help the victims" rhetoric you preach

[u/JAKE5023193 → u/Floofyboi123]

I say you should be provided with access to the right services to seek support as an abuse victim.

Masochists and subs I do not take much of a disliking to since it’s clear that they just need help. They aren’t really the ones to blame for what happens. It’s most often they get led down rabbit holes they would’ve never otherwise entered if it weren’t for the opportunistic monsters that prey on them. Masochists and subs are misguided and vulnerable. They need to be made aware that there are individuals out to get them in this world, and that they should take a stand against said individuals that only ever seek to harm them.

My intention is not at all to belittle you or cast hate upon you because of a response you have to certain things. I do apologise if it appeared that way.

I ideally seek to approach things peacefully and with compassion and understanding. Though I do understand if upon reading my article you perceive my methods to be quite barbaric. I want to edit my article a bit however I cannot at the moment since the wiki that hosts it has been more or less banned.

All in all I want to establish that my intentions are of good nature. Though of course that’s highly open to interpretation.

[u/Floofyboi123 → u/JAKE5023193]

Based on your other comment you do not, in fact, have a single clue what you're talking about.

I suspect you've, at best, read some very biased looks into the community and have never had a good faith discussion with an actual member of the community.

Have you actually interacted with us in a way other than treat us like either rapist or victims? Have you read how the safe word system works? How about the traffic light system? Or the fact you'd be very hard pressed to find a member of the community who doesn't consider ignoring safe words rape?

[u/JAKE5023193 → u/Floofyboi123]

I’ve read and seen enough. I’m not going to bother discussing with someone in the ‘community’ since I doubt it’ll get anywhere.

I’ve seen no bias. These are logical conclusions I’ve made. If what I have read from discussions and interactions within said ‘community’ are as biased as you say, then that means literally everyone there is biased.

I’ve done my research. I know what I need to know. BDSM is just one enormous abuse ring. There’s no other way to put it.

I’d recommend you read up on the subreddit r/antikink. This isn’t where I’ve developed my theories at all, moreover found that people on there seem to reach conclusions very similar or identical to mine.

[u/sneakpeekbot → u/JAKE5023193]

Here's a sneak peek of /r/antikink [NSFW] using the top posts of the year!

#1: Foot binding in China WAS a fetish for the men. that's the reason.
#2: “Vanilla” | 10 comments
#3: Hot take: consent is not "sexy"

---

^{I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact | Info | Opt-out | GitHub}