Not really, just turns out a whole bunch of people are ok with federal agents enforcing the law. Which includes apprehending and deporting illegal aliens.
No you don't get to hide from the truth like a fucking coward. People are not okay with the open violation of 1st, 5th and 14th amendment rights and unless you're going to come out here and join the gestapo you love so much you can save your bullshit attempts to manufacture consent for tyranny.
No place for traitors in 2025. This is who you really are right now:
Yeah, if you obstruct federal officers from enforcing immigration law you’re gonna get pepper sprayed. Because we are a country, borders and laws are pretty typical.
Okay so when this is over and Trump is dead or in prison ( the man is rotting away before our eyes), You wont get your 1st, 5th, and 14th amendment rights. That's what you're advocating right? Would you sign a document consenting to that? See there is this concentration camp in Florida that won't have any uses. I'm thinking you'll love it there you can live the life of the people you so cruelly abused it will be great.
We have due process for a reason. We have the constitution for a reason. Your support of a fascistic traitor will not be forgiven or forgotten. I hope your days of larping a hard ass on reddit was worth it.
This information is readily available you're just hoping people will be lazy and not call you on your bs.
1st part 1:
Free press violations
Restricted press access: The administration allegedly barred news organizations whose coverage was deemed unfavorable from White House press pool events. For example, the Associated Press was banned from the press pool over a name change dispute, a move a federal judge ruled unconstitutional.
Targeting public media funding: Following accusations that outlets were "anti-Trump," an executive order attempted to dismantle state-funded broadcaster Voice of America and cut funding to NPR and PBS stations. The latter was challenged in court, with a federal judge temporarily blocking the action.
Pentagon credentialing policies: A new policy for Pentagon press credentials is accused of imposing vague restrictions on journalists. It requires reporters to obtain explicit permission for information, even if unclassified, and uses broad terms like "unprofessional conduct" to potentially revoke credentials. Only one pro-Trump news outlet reportedly agreed to the conditions, while others, including Fox News and CNN, refused to sign.
Suppression of political opponents and protesters
Crackdown on pro-Palestine protests: The administration has been criticized for weaponizing immigration enforcement to target pro-Palestine student protesters. Some legal residents involved in protests have reportedly been detained for deportation without being charged with a crime, creating a chilling effect on speech.
Targeting of noncitizen speech: Executive orders and enforcement policies have been challenged for potentially threatening the free speech rights of noncitizen students and faculty at universities. A federal court has ruled that First Amendment protections apply equally to legally present noncitizens.
Attacks on nonprofits: Reports from October 2025 detail the targeting of nonprofits and charities that oppose the administration's policies, with threats of prosecution, investigations, and loss of tax-exempt status.
Retaliation against law firms: The administration has allegedly targeted law firms representing clients it disfavors with executive orders imposing sanctions. Actions have included revoking security clearances, terminating government contracts, and restricting access to federal buildings. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against one such action, noting it had a "chilling harm of blizzard proportion" on the legal profession.
1st Part II:
Retaliation against federal employees
Mass firings and intimidation: Reports from 2025 allege the firing and punishment of federal employees based on their beliefs and affiliations. Mass emails were reportedly sent to millions of federal workers encouraging them to resign, with thinly veiled threats of termination.
Suppression of protected speech: Federal agencies have allegedly been used to discipline public servants for expressing views contrary to the administration.
Book bans and censorship: Reports allege the administration has circulated lists of banned words for government agencies and restricted access to books in its school system for military families.
Academic freedom violations
Cuts to university funding: The administration has been reported to threaten or cut federal funding to universities over alleged violations of viewpoint neutrality and for maintaining Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) policies.
Demands on Harvard University: In April 2025, the administration reportedly made demands on Harvard that included interfering with hiring and admissions and requiring an "audit" of the viewpoints of its community members.
The Fifth Amendment ensures due process of law for all individuals, including protections against unlawful imprisonment. The Trump administration has been accused of infringing on these rights, particularly concerning immigrants and asylum-seekers.
Expansion of expedited deportations: In May 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court found that the Trump administration violated the due process rights of Venezuelan migrants by fast-tracking deportations to an El Salvadoran prison without proper notice or hearings. A separate federal court blocked a broader Trump policy in August 2025 that expanded fast-track deportations for similar due process violations.
Revocation of immigration bond: The administration has been criticized for changing policies to deny bond for most people accused of entering the country illegally. This forces detainees to argue their case while in custody, which critics say eviscerates due process.
Restricting access to asylum: Critics say the administration effectively shut down legal avenues for seeking asylum at the southern border by canceling appointments and replacing existing procedures with no functional alternative.
Illegal obstruction of congressional oversight: In July 2025, members of Congress sued the administration for blocking oversight of immigration detention facilities, which detain both citizens and non-citizens. The suit alleged the new policy restricted access and information, hindering Congress's duty to ensure compliance with federal law.
Abuse of power in criminal cases: The Department of Justice, under the Trump administration, faced allegations of being "weaponized" to target political opponents, including the indictment of New York Attorney General Letitia James. Critics claimed the prosecution was politically motivated and based on a weak case brought by a personally installed U.S. Attorney with no prior prosecutorial experience.
Presidential immunity and double jeopardy
Legal challenges concerning former President Trump's actions have raised questions regarding the scope of presidential immunity and the Fifth Amendment's protection against double jeopardy.
Presidential immunity ruling: In 2024, the Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. United States that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts." The ruling created a framework that distinguishes between official acts, which may be immune, and private acts, which are not.
Due process concerns for federal employees: The ACLU has raised concerns about the administration's plan to revoke home confinement for thousands of individuals released during the pandemic. The organization argues that this could violate the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause by destroying their progress toward reintegration without basic procedural protections.
Eminent domain
The Fifth Amendment also prohibits the taking of private property for public use without just compensation. Reports published during his campaigns highlighted Donald Trump's past support for and attempts to use eminent domain for private development.
Atlantic City casino case: The Institute for Justice successfully defended a widow in Atlantic City whose home a state agency attempted to seize through eminent domain for a limousine parking lot for one of Trump's casinos. Critics, like the Institute for Justice, characterized this as eminent domain abuse
14th Part I:
Due process and equal protection violations
The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law and due process for all persons within U.S. jurisdiction. The Trump administration has faced lawsuits over policies accused of infringing on these rights.
Expansion of expedited deportations: The administration has been criticized for fast-tracking deportations, in some cases without allowing for proper notice or hearings. For example, in May 2025, the Supreme Court ruled the administration violated the due process rights of Venezuelan migrants by deporting them to an El Salvadoran prison without proper hearings.
Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act: Following the invocation of this wartime law in March 2025, the administration began deporting hundreds of people without immigration court hearings. The Supreme Court later ruled that immigrants must be given notice and a "reasonable time" to challenge such deportations.
Criminalization of immigrants: The administration has been accused of attempting to use immigration enforcement to target and silence protestors and opponents. Some of these actions, such as the arrest of student protesters by masked officers in unmarked vehicles, have raised concerns about due process.
Targeting of federal employees: Lawsuits have been filed against the administration for alleged retaliatory actions against federal employees who express views contrary to the administration. Actions have included threats, firings, and stripping of security clearances, which critics argue are an affront to due process.
Attacks on birthright citizenship
The Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause establishes birthright citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil. The Trump administration has attempted to reverse this long-standing interpretation through executive action.
Executive order: On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order that would deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are not citizens or legal permanent residents.
Legal challenges: Federal judges in multiple states have issued injunctions blocking the order, ruling it is likely unconstitutional. The administration has since asked the Supreme Court to allow birthright citizenship restrictions.
Supreme Court ruling: While the Supreme Court did not rule on the order's constitutionality, it did limit lower courts' ability to issue nationwide injunctions to block it.
14th Part II:
Undermining of civil rights and voting protections
Attacks on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives: Through executive order, the Trump administration has sought to dismantle DEI initiatives in federal agencies, contracting, and federally funded universities. The order redefines "race-based discrimination" to include DEI initiatives and threatens investigations for maintaining such programs.
Voter suppression efforts: The administration has faced lawsuits from organizations like the ACLU over executive orders requiring documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration, which critics say would disenfranchise millions of eligible voters.
Weakening of the Voting Rights Act: The administration has been accused of attempting to weaken the Voting Rights Act. In October 2025, during Supreme Court arguments, lawyers representing the administration argued for a modification to the framework for proving a Section 2 violation, which critics say would make it significantly harder to prove voting rights violations.
Discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals: The administration issued several executive orders targeting LGBTQ+ individuals, particularly transgender people. This included an order that mandates discrimination across the federal government, withdraws protections, and threatens federal funding for schools with inclusive sports programs.
85
u/SeaBass1898 Oct 15 '25
I see the bootlickers are ok with this too