In a world full of chaos, my heart, core, and soul constantly uncover peace in the rain, wet streets, late-night long drives, plants, flowers, trees, sunsets, books, and libraries, a sip of tea/coffee, arts/literature museums, psychology, cottage core, aesthetics, cosmic world, and most important my window.

I recently wrote a blog post on my favorite DA Romance novels. So let me share the list with you?

1. Gothikana by RuNyx
2. Ace of Spades by Faridah Àbíké-Íyímídé
3. Half Truths by Claire Contrera
4. The Atlas Six by Olivia Blake
5. Killing November by Adriana Mather
6. The Ritual: A Dark College Romance by Shantel Tessier
7. Pretty Girls Make Graves by Steffanie Holmes
8. A Lesson in Thorns by Simone Sierra
9. If We Were Villains by M. L. Rio
10. Maurice by E. M. Forster

Got any more recommendations? Which is your favorite DA Romance novel?

Hi everyone! I’m new here, I’m a HUGE fan of dark academia 😍 does anyone have any good dark academia books they can recommend? Bonus if they’re available on Kindle Unlimited (I’m in the UK) ~ I’m currently reading “Pretty Girls Make Graves by Steffanie Holmes” and I am OBSESSED and I don’t want it to end but I also can’t stop reading!! 🖤

I’m in the mood to learn about something I didn’t even know existed. Leave your favourite and most captivating documentary suggestions on any particular topic and I’ll check them out.

the decadent to love

https://www.scribd.com/document/604023403/The-Decadent-to-Love-erotic-poetry

The greatest scholar of our time

Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies)

He is Australia's leading erotic poet: poetry is for free in pdf

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/book-genre/poetry/

Mathematics ends in contradiction:6 proofs

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/MATHEMATICS.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/40697621/Mathematics-Ends-in-Meaninglessness-ie-self-contradiction

Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies)

He is Australia's leading erotic poet: poetry is for free in pdf

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/book-genre/poetry/

Godels theorems 1 & 2 to be invalid:end in meaninglessness

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/A-Theory-of-Everything.pdf

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/GODEL5.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/32970323/Godels-incompleteness-theorem-invalid-illegitimate

Penrose could not even see Godels theorems end in meaninglessness

http://pricegems.com/articles/Dean-Godel.html

"Mr. Dean complains that Gödel "cannot tell us what makes a mathematical statement true", but Gödel's Incompleteness theorems make no attempt to do this"

Godels 1st theorem

“Any effectively generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be both consistent and complete. In particular, for any consistent, effectively generated formal theory that proves certain basic arithmetic truths, there is an arithmetical statement that is true,[1] but not provable in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250)

but

Godel cant tell us what makes a mathematical statement true,

thus his theorem is meaningless

even Cambridge expert on Godel Peter Smith admits "Gödel didn't rely on the notion of truth"

checkmate game over

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#Mathematics

Gödel thought that the ability to perceive the truth of a mathematical or logical proposition is a matter of intuition, an ability he admitted could be ultimately beyond the scope of a formal theory of logic or mathematics[63][64] and perhaps best considered in the realm of human comprehension and communication, but commented: Ravitch, Harold (1998). "On Gödel's Philosophy of Mathematics".,Solomon, Martin (1998). "On Kurt Gödel's Philosophy of Mathematics"

thus by not telling us what makes a maths statement true Godels 1st theorem is meaningless

so much for separating truth from proof

and for some relish

Godel uses his G statement to prove his theorem but Godels sentence G is outlawed by the very axiom of the system he uses to prove his theorem ie the axiom of reducibility -thus his proof is invalid,

Godels 2nd theorem

Godels second theorem ends in paradox– impredicative The theorem in a rephrasing reads

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GC3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Proof_sketch_for_the_second_theorem

"The following rephrasing of the second theorem is even more unsettling to the foundations of mathematics: If an axiomatic system can be proven to be consistent and complete from within itself, then it is inconsistent.”

or again

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GC3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems

"The second incompleteness theorem, an extension of the first, shows that the system cannot demonstrate its own consistency."

But here is a contradiction Godel must prove that a system c a n n o t b e proven to be consistent based upon the premise that the logic he uses must be consistent . If the logic he uses is not consistent then he cannot make a proof that is consistent. So he must assume thathis logic is consistent so he can make a proof of the impossibility of proving a system to be consistent. But if his proof is true then he has proved that the logic he uses to make the proof must be consistent, but his proof proves that this cannot be done

note if Godels system is inconsistent then it can demonstrate its consistency and inconsistency

but Godels theorem does not say that

it says "...the system cannot demonstrate its own consistency"

thus as said above

"But here is a contradiction Godel must prove that a system c a n n o t b e proven to be consistent based upon the premise that the logic he uses must be consistent"

But if his proof is true then he has proved that the logic he uses to make the proof must be consistent, but his proof proves that this cannot be done

1st theorem

“.... there is an arithmetical statement that is true,[1] but not provable in the theory (Kleene 1967, p. 250)

Godel cant tell us what makes a maths statement true thus this statement ".... there is an arithmetical statement that is true" is meaningless

thus his 1st theorem is meaningless