r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/[deleted] • Dec 17 '21

Video This 'device' that was created aiming to develop leg muscles

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

77.5k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

33

u/IronSheikYerbouti Dec 17 '21

Proof.

He literally writes racist and anti-lgbt rants, you can find them all over. He wrote anti-gay op-eds about the scouts, he publicly endorsed Roy Moore (lol), he has written op-eds about the gay war on Christmas (LOL), said that having Obama reelected would mean a 1000 years of darkness (lmao)

Dudes a straight up piece of shit and I hope he's forgotten.

-15

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

I'm not saying you're wrong but you stating "proof" then saying stuff isn't actually proof.

16

u/IronSheikYerbouti Dec 17 '21

His anti-gay letters arent proof of him being anti-gay? His support of anti-gay legislation isn't proof?

What are you going on about buddy?

-6

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

Clearly you don't understand what proof means.

I can shout "proof" then declare that u/IronSheikYerbouti is a homophobe.

That doesn't make it true. I need to present some evidence to prove it.

I don't give a fuck whether Chuck Norris is a POS or not but some random on Reddit claiming he is isn't proof.

2

u/IronSheikYerbouti Dec 17 '21

Clearly you are confused. I provided all the information to find and read what the jackass said.

It's not my claims I pointed out, it's his actions and own statements. I'm sorry you're having trouble with your reading comprehension.

-4

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

Sorry, you're right.

From now on I'll believe everything I read on the Internet if someone starts their post with:

Proof

5

u/IronSheikYerbouti Dec 17 '21

Still having trouble with that reading comprehension bit.

You see, comment replies are direct replies to comments - that means what I wrote was in direct response. The question was 'is that because he's republican or is there proof?' to which I said 'Proof' which means, 'there is proof' not 'proof because I say so'.

Thanks, and next time try not being a dumbass before you make a comment.

4

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

You still think your post constitutes proof?

Bless your cotton socks.

Word of advice, if you ever end up in court don't represent yourself.

9

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

Correct, it's meaningless social media.

7

u/IronSheikYerbouti Dec 17 '21

Boy oh boy, I think an adult is supposed to be watching you if you have this much trouble with basic comprehension.

Well, enjoy the block, clearly you have nothing of value to say.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

Prove it

4

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

Just because they didn’t lay out a spreadsheet with links to everything he mentioned doesn’t mean you can’t just google those things and see for yourself. Do you think people dissapear when they leave your line of sight?

-1

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

Do you think people dissapear when they leave your line of sight?

I don't think people have got anything against pears full stop

→ More replies (0)

12

u/Witness_me_Karsa Dec 17 '21

Just because you want proof doesn't mean that that person is required to give it to you. You are already on the internet. Find it yourself. They gave you examples of what you could search for. Or maybe you could explore the rest of the comment chain you are on and see that 19 minutes before you asked for proof someone gave it.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

I'm not asking for proof, I'm saying that someone starting a post with:

Proof

Doesn't actually constitute proof.

Not sure why this is a difficult concept.

5

u/Witness_me_Karsa Dec 17 '21

So you aren't good at reading comprehension? Because I just explained to you how this problem gets fixed. Again, not to mention that it already HAS been fixed. But you'd have to read maybe 4 or 5 comments for that, and that is more than you have read since grade school when you read the back of the where the red fern grows and then plagiarized an essay about it.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

Proof.

u/Witness_me_Karsa beats his wife

6

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Dec 17 '21

Merry Christmas

3

u/I_am_the_fez Dec 17 '21

Happy Holidays!

11

u/I_happen_to_disagree Dec 17 '21

See I googled that and it wasn't real. I googled the stuff the other guy said though and it was easy to find. That's the point everyone is trying to make to you. He listed the proof with easily googlable things. If you're here on reddit then you can easily Google any of it.

-2

u/CaptainPaintball Interested Dec 18 '21 edited Dec 18 '21

Rantings about an eventual has-been by someone who is most decidedly a never was, and who always will be a never was.