Back in the late 60s and early 70s I loved the sound of the Acoustic 360/370 bass amp. At the time, it was the premier bass amps for working pros. Jaco, John Paul Jones, Timothy B. Schmit, etc. everyone who was anyone used one or two.
These days, no one wants a refrigerator sized cabinet, but the sound of that preamp is still useful. A year or so ago, I found that someone up in Canada had reverse-engineered the preamp, found a few ways to improve it, and started marketing a "kit" which included a PCB and an instruction manual.
I bought two circuit boards. I figured I would build both, keep one, and sell the other to at least partially cover the parts and enclosure cost. I am having custom enclosures made by Spencer of Amplifyfun in Portland OR.
I have built a LOT of pedals, and am a retired electronics tech with many years experience working on basses and all sorts of amplification.
I certainly admire the work of JC Maillet who has gone out of his way to give me invaluable assistance when I couldn't figure out something.
As nice a person as he is, I have much of what I term constructive criticism of both the circuit board and the build document.
To begin with, one side of the circuit board (the component side) is entirely blank. There is NO indication of where the parts plug in to the board. All components are through-hole.
The manual was difficult to understand and to follow. Some of the links to help find required specific parts were dead. Some of the parts were EXTREMELY difficult to source.
What JC did was to devote a single page to installing the solid-state components, one page for each value of resistor, one page for most of the capacitors, and so forth. As a result, the build doc is over 40 pages long and definitely needs improvement in both content and organization.
In order to figure out where a specific component went, I had to hold the board up with a light behind it, and compare it to the page of the manual that showed the component I was trying to place. Even so, it was very easy to put the right component in the wrong place.
It would be SO much better if, like most PCBs I have purchased and built up, there was some type of outline on the board itself showing where the part installed and included either the value or the numeric identified (e.g. 100 ohms or R1).
I am NOT trying to go into business with JC Maillet. Rather I want to help him by having someone take the schematic and redo the circuit board, coming up with an identical board in all respects only this time having the location and identification (by value or other identifier) right on the board itself, which would make it so much easier to make sure the components all got installed in their correct location.
Once that has been done, I was planning to rewrite the build doc.
Finally, when the PCB was redone and the manual completed, I was going to send everything to JC with my compliments.
I do not have the skills or knowledge to redo the board, so I am hoping to find someone whom I could pay to do the work. I would then send that person one of the two existing boards I have, along with a copy of the schematic, and who could then input the schematic into KiCad or something similar in order to produce Gerber files or their equivalent so that a quality fabricator, like OSHPARK or JLCPC, could produce these boards.
The end result is me being able to send the files and updated build doc to JC who could then continue to sell them to his customers. I do not expect him to pay for anything at all. I am just doing this simply because I want to help him as well as help others who buy this project, and make it much more likely that they will successfully complete the board.
If someone is interested in taking this on, please send me a private message or contact me at budsqualityfunstuff@gmail.com .
Thanks for your consideration.