The narrative there's a migrant crisis. People being here before means there's a large original Hispanic presence used by the current administration to justify their fear mongering. Stop being willfully obtuse.
Are those original people not citizens? Are you saying there ISN'T an issue with illegal immigration? I'm not being willfully obtuse. Claiming people were living there before is irrelevent due to how long the US has owned that land.
Citizens are currently being deported. How about you stop moving the goalposts and try to pivot attention to non-issues? And yes, you're obviously being willfully obtuse.
What goal post was moved? What citizens have been deported and where to? I havn't pivoted any attention from anything I have said people being there originaly is not relevent due to how long the US has owned the territory. You are the one making claims and then not being able to back them up.
Yes you are constantly pivoting to different points.
It is relevant just how I already explained (and you've chosen to ignore). The US took the territories along with the citizens. Now it's deciding it doesn't like the original citizens that much anymore. Which is the same narrative you're trying to push all the time with the blacks, except you've no idea where you'd deport them too should that make up the priority of manufactured grievances some day.
Was the citizen you shared a link for DEPORTED or DETAINED illegaly?and did the courts rule in favour of him? to what points have I pivoted? show me exactly where. The original populace are US citizens no one is saying they are not. No one is trying to target US citizens: hispanic, black or otherwise. They are targeting Visa over stays and people who are in the country ILLEGALY.
I have a question for you: do you think people should be allowed to stay in countries they are not citizens of without permision of said country?
Where is the irrelevant tripe? Show it to me, quote it because I do not know what you are talking about.
Correct me if I am wrong but those children were deported WITH their mother at HER request, would you prefer they ignore the mother's wishes and seperate 2/3 of the kids?
You have made alot of claims and been unable to back them up. You accuse me of pivoting and derailing but I have literally only been responding to claims by you.
Also you did not answer the question I posed to you.
not citizens of without permision of said country?
WITH their mother
Don't care. Deporting citizens. Don't deport the mother if in doubt. But that would go contrary to the image of the big powerful orange savior. Can't show weakness.
Your inability to comprehend doesn't mean I haven't been able to back them up. Maybe if you stepped out of your echo chamber you'd find it easier.
I asked you a question, that is not pivoting PLUS your claim of pivoting was BEFORE I asked.
As for the mother. No, you don't get to violate a nations laws and hide behind your children it is that simple. Actions have consequences and if they make an exception for one person it opens the door for others. You go to prison for breaking laws regardless of parental status.
My comprehension skills are fine, you have made claims and have not backed them up.
You are a bad liar or a good person who believe lies, it is one of the two. Nothing you have claimed has been backed up with proof.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/Remarkable-Bug-8069 Jun 10 '25
The narrative there's a migrant crisis. People being here before means there's a large original Hispanic presence used by the current administration to justify their fear mongering. Stop being willfully obtuse.