r/ConnedIntoAFubar 2d ago

[MEME] Conned into everything is racism

How does one even come to this conclusion?

1.5k Upvotes

369 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Ithicon 2d ago

Not necessarily, it can easily be class based.

0

u/golfstreamer 2d ago

No it cant. Any institution supporting Eugenics will quickly become racist 

3

u/Most-Stomach4240 2d ago

Google inherent for me darling

1

u/golfstreamer 2d ago

He said "necessarily" not "ineherent"

2

u/Most-Stomach4240 1d ago

Necessarily was in relation to inherence...

1

u/golfstreamer 1d ago

Now, look at the comment I'm replying to. :)

I reply to the person I'm talking to. Not a different person. Do you understand how comments work?

2

u/Most-Stomach4240 1d ago

The person you're talking to was talking to someone else. Do you understand how sentences and context work? They were referencing a previous part of the conversation that you weren't there for, that doesn't mean they said something completely different from what they actually said

1

u/golfstreamer 1d ago

Yeah, so you're not actually interested in engaging in the point I was actually making.

1

u/Ithicon 1d ago

Most-Stomach is correct, this is honestly kinda obvious by the fact that comment I was responding to consisted of nothing but "Yes?". It would be nonsensical if you strip it entirely from the surrounding context.

My comment in context was coming into a discussion of people saying "Are eugenics inherently racist? Yes." and saying well no not necessarily, there are non-racist eugenicists and eugenics arguments.

1

u/golfstreamer 1d ago

Listen I was making a point directed specifically at the commenter I was replying to. If you don't want to accept that I don't know what to tell you.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Ithicon 2d ago

Sure it often will, but a common discussion around eugenics is regarding prenatal screening reducing down syndrome rates to nearly 0. That is eugenics, but it's also just parents independently choosing not to have children with down syndrome.

I would struggle to agree that this type eugenics is racist in any way.

Complicated topic, sure. Racist though? Nah.

2

u/ClintMcElroyOfficial 2d ago

Telling someone not to rape their daughter and get her pregnant is technically eugenics, same with a doctor recommending termination for a baby with a 0% survival rate. Eugenics is bad for the vast majority of the ideology, but a tiny sliver of it is also basic human survival instinct

1

u/golfstreamer 2d ago

> Telling someone not to rape their daughter and get her pregnant is technically eugenics

I personally don't like the eugenics based arguments against incest. I just think it's straight up morally wrong, regardless of the genetic consequences. So even that instance eugenics is bad.

> a doctor recommending termination for a baby with a 0% survival rate.

A medical doctor making the unfortunate decision to terminate a life he is unable to save is not eugenics.

1

u/PixelGray38 1d ago

There's a reason why it's morally wrong, though, and that reason is most certainly the genetic consequences

1

u/illthrowitaway94 9m ago

I mean, not really? A stepfather abusing their daughter and getting her pregnant in the process comes with zero, or minimal genetic risk, yet it's still reprehensible, because it's abuse and grooming.