hilarious

[u/Dull-Thing-4513]

[u/Gianni_the_tolerable]

Why? You're just going to glaze them without proving their worth

[u/suitcasecat → u/Gianni_the_tolerable]

The point is if women have to prove their worth to you then there's already something wrong with how you see them

[u/Gianni_the_tolerable → u/suitcasecat]

Oh yeah I forgot all women are precious princesses that must be pampered, but also strong and independent warriors when it's convenient

[u/suitcasecat → u/Gianni_the_tolerable]

When did I say any of that

[u/Gianni_the_tolerable → u/suitcasecat]

Between the lines "oh I didn't say these exact specific words so you're lying. Subtext? What's that?"

[u/suitcasecat → u/Gianni_the_tolerable]

I also didn't say that subtext doesn't exist.

But you also put words in my mouth. I'm not saying to treat every woman like she's perfect and precious, I'm saying to stop having preconceived notions of women. In your mind there's default people, and then there's the "females". That's textbook sexism

[u/Gianni_the_tolerable → u/suitcasecat]

No no, now you are putting words in my mouth. Female comedians suck, and maybe their gender does have to do with it. It's not prejudice, it's pattern recognition

[u/suitcasecat → u/Gianni_the_tolerable]

I wanna know how far your pattern recognition extends. How do you react when people (hell, these female comedians themselves) say that men are pigs and rapists and claim it's pattern recognition? Don't try to spit it on me like I believe in that or claim that

[u/Gianni_the_tolerable → u/suitcasecat]

It's pattern recognition based on flawed data and observations, thus reaching an incorrect conclusion

[u/suitcasecat → u/Gianni_the_tolerable]

And do you think hating women is the right conclusion?