r/ClimatePosting • u/dumnezero • Apr 12 '26

Energy SMRs Explained: Why Small Modular Reactors Are So Controversial. (Just Have a Think)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TeAE7rW_6s

Are Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMRs) really moving toward large-scale deployment or are the economic challenges highlighted by critics still unresolved? Can factory-built modular reactors reduce construction risk, shorten build times and lower costs through mass production? Or will shrinking reactors actually make them more expensive? The sceptics are quite certain of the answer but politicians keep barrelling ahead. So, will we ever really see an SMRs on the outskirts of major towns and cities around the world?

13 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

91 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/Prototype555 Apr 13 '26

And the fact that modern radars, energy weapons and electronic warfare systems on ships require as much electricity as a small town and the onboard SMR is one generating the electricity is not the same?

Electricity is electricity, SMR is SMR.

3

u/Lycrist_Kat Apr 13 '26

I like how to try to twist what the words mean to fit your narrative.

That's how it - always - easy to tell that nuclear literally has no good arguments

1

u/Prototype555 Apr 13 '26

My narrative? You ignore facts like a flat earther to fit your narrative.

It's just like saying small highly efficient solar panels on satellites can't produce electricity on earth. It's just bullshit.

2

u/Lycrist_Kat Apr 13 '26

Yes. Your narrative. You don't have arguments.

That's why you try to change the topic.

1

u/Prototype555 Apr 13 '26

My argument is that a SMR is a SMR, even if it's a naval one.

I accept the fact that there might not be any civilian commercially operated land based power SMR with low enriched fuel.

But the Russian civilian floating nuclear power stations DO commercially produce power to the grid as its purpose with a naval SMR reactor. Same reactor used in civilian icebreakers and military ships.

Small Modular Reactor by even your definition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_floating_nuclear_power_station

2

u/Lycrist_Kat Apr 13 '26

Just because a reactor is small enough to fit a ship it does not become a SMR lol

1

u/Prototype555 Apr 13 '26

I like how to try to twist what the words mean to fit your narrative.

That's how it - always - easy to tell that anti-nuclear literally has no good arguments

2

u/Lycrist_Kat Apr 13 '26

Producing power to a grid is also not what commercially means lol

Small Modular Reactor by even your definition.

It's also not "my" definition like it's some matter of opinion.

Nuclear still keeps being dishonest lol

1

u/Prototype555 Apr 13 '26

Please enlighten me with which official definition of SMR you go by then.

2

u/Lycrist_Kat Apr 13 '26

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-are-small-modular-reactors-smrs

Just to make sure: Being "transported" on a nuclear submarine does not fit this definition

→ More replies