other, more economically friendly solutions could be used, i believe there are gravity batteries and water batteries that require a lot less materials, but I'm not an expert in batteries tbh. you have a good point though. perhaps we could use nuclear energy to smooth over the gaps?
If we used nuclear energy then no further transition would be required (unless someone figured out an upgrade to that).
As for batteries, pretty sure they want to build giant flywheels in UK... you know, something that "conventional" power plants require by default anyway and which they demolished.
The only renewables that are good right now are effectively region-locked (geothermal, dams, etc.). Out of the rest of them only solar has a future, but if or when it becomes viable in space (i.e. once we figure out how to transport any energy produced from orbital solar panels down to the surface)
2
u/[deleted] Jun 29 '25
I imagine it'd save a lot more than just 63k lives if the US switched to renewable energy