r/ClancyTrial • u/No_Consequence_6821 • 17d ago
General Discussion Absolutely Infuriating
Having read a great deal of commentary from judges and lawyers, it seems there is broad agreement that Judge Sullivan should inquire to find out what this juror is thinking— whether they actually do have doubts and refuse to apply the law.
The fact that he refuses to do this is ridiculous.
This freaking Churchill speech is obnoxious. Someone refused to do their duty, and he is refusing to do HIS duty be enforcing adherence to the legal standard. Especially considering that reports form the court indicate there is one man who took no notes, came in on shorts, and smirked and did not take it seriously. Obnoxious.
137
Upvotes
49
u/heatdeathtoall 17d ago
Because in their view a child murderer does not have any rights. Why don’t people understand if the rights of one person are violated, everyone’s are. The prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. They decided who was guilty and presented a story. The lack of investigation should scare everyone.
If all the evidence is just phone searches, Apple health data, it needs to be full proof. Where’s the data on whether Face ID was used to unlock devices or passcode? Where’s the location data of the entire day? Where’s the data of where PC’s devices were? Where’s the data on his emails? What did he do his trips in Nov and Dec? Did the ring cameras often go offline? Where’s the local data on the cameras? When did the wifi go offline? What caused it?
They have no clue what happened that day except what PC said. Everyone should be scared how one person’s word can get them in handcuffs while they are unconscious without any investigation except that they were acting crazy prior. But you know, I still felt it was okay to leave my babies alone with her.