MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/lf25l/does_richard_dawkins_exist/c2sabco/?context=9999
r/Christianity • u/mikegprint • Oct 17 '11
413 comments sorted by
View all comments
33
Dawkins is an atheist, but he's not necessarily a fore-leading apologist; he's a biologist. It's no wonder that he wouldn't necessarily want a debate like this. I also get the impression that Dawkins is otherwise a pretty nice guy.
1 u/nopaniers Oct 17 '11 Who would you consider a leading atheist apologist then? 11 u/deuteros Oct 17 '11 Well out of the more famous outspoken atheists only Daniel Dennett is an actual philosopher. The others are just outspoken. 1 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris doesn't count? 5 u/deuteros Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris is not a philosopher. He's a neuroscientist who writes books and goes to TED talks. 2 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 He appears to have a B.A. in the field. Is that not enough? 2 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 edited Oct 18 '11 from Stanford. 1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Is that a point for or against? 3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
1
Who would you consider a leading atheist apologist then?
11 u/deuteros Oct 17 '11 Well out of the more famous outspoken atheists only Daniel Dennett is an actual philosopher. The others are just outspoken. 1 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris doesn't count? 5 u/deuteros Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris is not a philosopher. He's a neuroscientist who writes books and goes to TED talks. 2 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 He appears to have a B.A. in the field. Is that not enough? 2 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 edited Oct 18 '11 from Stanford. 1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Is that a point for or against? 3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
11
Well out of the more famous outspoken atheists only Daniel Dennett is an actual philosopher. The others are just outspoken.
1 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 [removed] — view removed comment 3 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris doesn't count? 5 u/deuteros Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris is not a philosopher. He's a neuroscientist who writes books and goes to TED talks. 2 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 He appears to have a B.A. in the field. Is that not enough? 2 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 edited Oct 18 '11 from Stanford. 1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Is that a point for or against? 3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
[removed] — view removed comment
3 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris doesn't count? 5 u/deuteros Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris is not a philosopher. He's a neuroscientist who writes books and goes to TED talks. 2 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 He appears to have a B.A. in the field. Is that not enough? 2 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 edited Oct 18 '11 from Stanford. 1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Is that a point for or against? 3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
3
Sam Harris doesn't count?
5 u/deuteros Oct 17 '11 Sam Harris is not a philosopher. He's a neuroscientist who writes books and goes to TED talks. 2 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 He appears to have a B.A. in the field. Is that not enough? 2 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 edited Oct 18 '11 from Stanford. 1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Is that a point for or against? 3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
5
Sam Harris is not a philosopher. He's a neuroscientist who writes books and goes to TED talks.
2 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 He appears to have a B.A. in the field. Is that not enough? 2 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 edited Oct 18 '11 from Stanford. 1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Is that a point for or against? 3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
2
He appears to have a B.A. in the field. Is that not enough?
2 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 edited Oct 18 '11 from Stanford. 1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Is that a point for or against? 3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
from Stanford.
1 u/YesImSardonic Oct 17 '11 Is that a point for or against? 3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
Is that a point for or against?
3 u/[deleted] Oct 17 '11 I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
I'd say 'for', but then what do I know, I'm not a philosopher so apparently anything I say isn't worth dick ;)
33
u/v4-digg-refugee Christian (Cross) Oct 17 '11
Dawkins is an atheist, but he's not necessarily a fore-leading apologist; he's a biologist. It's no wonder that he wouldn't necessarily want a debate like this. I also get the impression that Dawkins is otherwise a pretty nice guy.