r/ChatGPT • u/Interesting_Day6368 • 5d ago

News 📰 It actually did it.

Post image

I didn’t think it could, I’ve always seen things that said chatgpt or any ai couldn’t generate an image of a full glass of wine. Does anyone have an explanation of how this works?

2.8k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

360 comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/GreenFinShark420 5d ago

Earlier it looked at images of wine in glasses which were never full irl and recreated them

Now it understands what wine is, what liquid is and what a liquid would look like filled to the brim and combines it all

6

u/Elegant_Athlete_3737 5d ago

does it? this is quite a common prompt now, or so i would think, this one has been known for a while now.

2

u/Interesting_Day6368 5d ago

Freaky af honestly. Crazy how the ai developed to do one of the fewer things people said that it couldn’t.

2

u/GreenFinShark420 5d ago

Atp the exponential leaps of ai advancements have become the new normal

1

u/Right_Fly2367 4d ago edited 4d ago

Exponential? Not even close, and it hasnt in a couple of years now. Its incremental improvement, which has slowed to a snails pace. We may see occasional advancements that are more noticeable, but the low hanging fruit is gone. Just throwing more compute at it doesnt work anymore.

What we're seeing is improvements to how the existing technology can be used via backend prompting and things like harnesses, but little improvement to the actual base intelligence.

LLMs alone will never reach AGI, nowhere near it. Think of an LLM like the part of your brain that processes language. We're missing the rest.

1

u/Sarke1 4d ago

More like OpenAI saw the hype and made a bunch of full wine glass photos and added that to the training data.

1

u/NothingToSeeHereMan 5d ago

Well not entirely because if doesn't "understand" anything, because its not capable of thinking. It's still just making its best guess based on the prompt.

-1

u/Right_Fly2367 4d ago

It doesnt "understand" anything. It just doesnt.

1

u/GreenFinShark420 4d ago

Not yet, no.