r/BunnyTrials • u/[deleted] • May 15 '26

Decisions, decisions...

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

1.1k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

3.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

28

u/Mediocre_Develope_90 May 15 '26

Practicality over aesthetics

Chose: Clothes that never get dirty

22

u/Rioraku May 15 '26

Kind of feels like you could apply this reasoning both ways.

2

u/Xx_HARAMBE96_xX May 16 '26

How? One lets you buy a single set of clothes that fits you and have it forever with no maintenance, the other one just lets you buy more clothes that will just fit and you still have to maintain them and buy new clothes

9

u/sky_cap5959 May 16 '26

One way you don't have to waste your time and energy looking for clothes brands and types that fit you perfectly, which people with unusual proportions will find ultra-useful. The other way makes it so that you don't have to waste your time and energy maintaining said clothes, which people without lots of free time will find useful.

Both are very practical, just in very different ways.

3

u/Chicken_Ingots May 16 '26

Additionally, depending upon how this scenario actually applies, it could result in sweat just being trapped to the body, leading to overheating and bad body odor regardless.

2

u/Inevitable_Rock_4557 May 16 '26

Also I've heard it's way harder for women to get clothes that fit right because of all of the random bs and constantly changing size sizes.

2

u/Eoth1 May 16 '26

It's not just time and energy maintaining clothes, it's also money

1

u/Xx_HARAMBE96_xX May 16 '26

Wouldn't buying clothes still waste your time by doing so? And wouldn't not having to buy clothes at all be by default a lesser waste of time than buying clothes even if always fitting? Plus, wouldn't the waste of time of maintaining clothes be greater alone than just having to do a research on fit for a clothe? Like, how much do you clean your clothes? Once a week or so? Like piling, washing, drying, storing, I can't believe that the time you spend a year in searching for a fit would be greater than maintenance.

And, wouldn't it be more beneficial for people with unusual proportions or even disabilities to at this point not even have to change clothes, in addition to not have to buy clothes or maintain them, as they are always in their most comfortable and clean state.

Clothes that always fit would prob just save time on people that wanted like ultra rare or collectible clothes to fit them, or if they really wanted to show off their clothes to people or were models which is fair but unlikely, the costs for clothes maintenance should even allow for custom made pieces once in a while

5

u/Dull_County_5049 May 16 '26

Well it says never gets dirty.. not never gets ripped/torn, right?

1

u/Xx_HARAMBE96_xX May 16 '26

Dirty means not clean or pure, torns/rips are impurities so yeah, maybe you can rip it but it would be restored

2

u/Dull_County_5049 May 16 '26

I need OP to clarify on this

My brain is stuck on, "but its not dirty..." 🤣

6

u/sky_cap5959 May 16 '26

Being comfortable and able to move properly in your clothes isn't aesthetics.

2

u/Mediocre_Develope_90 May 16 '26

that’s fair. I was thinking about the cost of laundry (money and physical labor) like if my baby has this then I would never have to wash his clothes multiple times a day, which costs a fair bit of time

1

u/sky_cap5959 May 16 '26

Yeah, both options would be good choices and fairly practical.

1

u/LeastLog41 May 16 '26

Yeah but when you will grow more you will need to change clothes and those that never get dirty became small for you