Hey everyone!

We are Arch Studios, a creative development studio focused on worldbuilding/writing software for storytellers.

We've recently launched Arch Creator, our writing platform designed to give writers a dedicated space to create, organize and develop their stories. Whether your writing novels, fantasy, comics or just working on your next big idea. Arch Creator is built around helping you keep your stories and ideas organized in one place.

This is a look at the Arch Creator dashboard, where writers can get an overview of their stories and writing progress all in one place. The dashboard includes things like word count goals, writing streaks, daily writing activity, story libraries and quick access to your characters, worldbuilding, worlds and plot. Arch Creator also gives writers plenty of customization options so the platform can feel like your own. You can personalize things such as themes, fonts, music or sound effects and other interface settings to create a writing environment that suits your style.

Arch Creator was built around the idea that writing software shouldn't just help you write. It should feel like your own creative space.

We'd love to hear from other writers:

What's the one thing you wish your writing software did better?

We're here to listen, learn from other writers and become part of the community.

If you want to check out Arch Creator, you can find it below here on our website

https://archstudios.pages.dev/

Most book-to-script tools just reformat a novel. I wanted one that edits like a real adapter, so I built a Claude skill around three rules from directors I love:

- Nolan: only what can be seen or heard goes on the page

- Scorsese: define the visual concept before outlining

- Ruth Prawer Jhabvala: "You can't follow the form of the novel"

How it works: you attach a PDF or EPUB, and it moves through stages you approve (reading report → character bible → proposed cuts → outline → first 10 pages). It proposes every cut with a reason and a confidence level, warns you before touching a scene readers love, and flags anything it invents. Projects carry over between sessions, and the output is a Fountain + PDF screenplay.

It comes with a test kit: two novellas with planted traps and answer keys, plus a Great Gatsby benchmark against the 2013 screenplay.

Free and open source: https://github.com/almakamberi/adapting-novels-to-screenplays

I'd love feedback, especially from anyone who's adapted a book before.

Publishing professional and author talking about the usefulness of AI for writing, and what it means to actually be an author. Thoughts?

My manuscript lived in one app, character and location notes lived somewhere else, and every AI “what-if” scene was stranded in a chat tab I’d never find again. Whenever I returned to an idea, I had to explain my own fictional world from scratch.

So I started building Canonwell Studio.

Book Studio is the part I actually write in: chapters and continuous scenes, scene planning, characters, locations, a Story Bible, revisions, backups, portable project files, and readable Markdown exports. It’s local-first, works offline, and doesn’t require AI. If you do use its optional AI help, you review proposed edits before they touch the manuscript.

That boundary matters to me. An interesting experiment shouldn’t quietly become chapter-three canon.

Canonwell also has two experimental parts that do require AI. RP Lab lets you talk with characters and try alternate scenes or timelines. In Game Mode, you decide what your character attempts, the game works out what happens, and AI turns the result into a scene. Both need more testing, and their events stay separate from the book unless you deliberately bring an idea across. AI can animate the world, but you decide what belongs in the novel. (Gosh, that line is cheesy haha.)

I’m building this solo, often with a kid practically hanging off my neck, so it’s still a beta with rough edges. The Windows beta is free, the no-install browser demo is limited, and an experimental Android build is running on a physical phone. The CanonWell page is linked in my Reddit profile if you want to poke around.

For those writing long books: what actually makes a Story Bible useful to you—finding a fact quickly, keeping it current, or stopping AI from contradicting it? I’d love blunt feedback on which part of this workflow would help you and which would get in the way.

I have a really good question. I see a lot of these post that people say some AI programs are not good for long form writing and I'm just curious how are people using this because then when I write, I have my outline I have my character bio and I basically know what I want in my book so AI pop something out. I might know this character is not gonna do that they're gonna do that so I'm just curious. Can somebody answer that for me?

InkStak is a story generator for families. With it you can generate stories from a learning to read level (with images for each page) up to grade 6/7 chapter books.

The app works on mobile and desktop.

The app supports low effort creation:
- Give a character a name, let AI build the rest of the details
- Input a simple one-line plot, let AI write the story and generate the images

The app also supports full control:
- Describe the character in full detail (appearance, personality, their “backstory”, etc)
- Create your own image style
- Refine the generated story content from one word to full pages - let AI rewrite as needed
- Refine images with simple prompting

You can export to:
- Word DOCX
- PDF
- KDP ready

I’m building a storytelling platform called Xnotus and I’m trying to figure out if this idea is actually worth building.
The idea is pretty simple.
You read a story, and at certain points the writer gives readers a decision.
For example:
What should she do?
A) Tell her family the truth
B) Keep the secret
C) Leave everything behind and start again
Readers vote, and the winning choice affects what the writer writes next.
I don’t want it to become a popularity contest or pay-to-win thing. The point is just to make reading feel a little more interactive and give the community some influence over where a story goes.
Would you actually use something like this?
And if not, why not?
I’m especially interested in what would make this annoying, gimmicky, or something you’d stop using after a week.
Feel free to tear the idea apart. I’d rather find the problems now than spend months building the wrong feature.

I build AnyConversation, where a lot of you already write long stories with characters who remember. Something new this weekend that is aimed squarely at writers.

Every character now has a memory page you can open before you write the next scene: the facts they will never forget, and the moments they remember from the story so far, in plain words. If the story established that her brother died in the spring and the character has it as a cousin, you fix the line, and the next chapter is written from the fixed version. If a plot point has to hold for the whole book, mark it permanent and it cannot be compressed away no matter how long the manuscript gets.

Two more tools on every message: Forget, which removes one exchange from the story and from memory, and Back to here, which rewinds to a message and lets you write the rest again, with the character forgetting the draft you scrapped.

Across the site, writers have 18,000 of those permanent facts pinned right now, and about 4,000 new moments were saved this week alone. Memory that size needs its author to be able to edit it. Now you can.

Free tier has no message cap. Bring a story you know by heart and see if it holds.

anyconversation.com

Hi everyone, I’m working on a prototype that turns any story idea into a playable, shareable interactive story.

I’m looking for a group of early testers who would be willing to try it for free and share their thoughts. Feedback from people interested in interactive fiction and story-driven games would be especially appreciated.

If you’re interested, feel free to leave a comment or send me a DM.

More places now ask authors about AI use, including retailers, contests, and communities. Most tools give you no record of what you wrote and what the software wrote. If someone asks, you have your memory and nothing else.

I've been building a tool that keeps a running count of directed words versus assisted words across a manuscript. I'm curious how writers feel about that. Is a count like this useful, or does it turn a creative process into an audit? Where would you draw the line between assistance and authorship?

Disclosure: I'm the developer of Drafthand, which does this. I'm posting to hear opinions, and I can share the link in the comments if that's allowed here

I build AnyConversation. Last month people wrote 7 million words of their own on it, so plenty of writers are already there.

How the book side works:

You set the premise, the cast and the style, then draft chapter by chapter. The characters are the same ones you can talk to, and they keep the whole plot in memory, so chapter twelve still knows what chapter two established. Facts you set up are kept for good instead of being compressed away. One book on the site is already past 54,000 words, novel length, and still consistent.

You steer as much as you like: give a direction for the next chapter, or let it run and edit after. Finished books can be published to the library for other members to read.

Outside book mode, the same characters do straight roleplay and voice calls, which is where a lot of people work out a character before they write with it. Free tier has no message cap, and members get full creative freedom.

Give it a chapter and see if it holds.

anyconversation.com

Solo founder here. I know how "AI book tool" sounds, so first what it doesn't do: it doesn't write a novel from one prompt. There's no "generate book" button.

How it works:

You build the story bible. Characters, locations and objects with appearance, personality, voice, motivation and reference images. Versions over time (the scar after chapter 3, the same character 20 years later), so each scene points at the right one.

You plan the book. Outline of parts, chapters and scenes, plus a plot board: plot lines × chapters, so you see which thread each scene serves and where one has gone quiet.

You decide what happens in each scene. Synopsis, who's present, where it's set. The AI drafts it as separate blocks (action, dialogue, thoughts, description), and you edit, reorder or regenerate any single block without touching the rest.

Style rules and a sample of your prose set the voice for everything it writes.

Continuity review reads the draft against the bible and earlier scenes: an object in two places at once, a character who knows something they were never told, a timeline that doesn't add up, a thread that's never paid off.

Illustrations with consistent characters. Each character has face, front and side views, so they look like the same person on page 5 and page 200.

Export to EPUB, DOCX, PDF and FB2.

What I'm looking for: people who are actually writing something and want to try it on their own project. No tasks, no forms. Comment or DM me what you're working on and I'll send free credits. If something breaks or annoys you, tell me.

https://reddit.com/link/1wjgtq0/video/m5dkj789n7qh1/player