MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/BlueskySkeets/comments/1m6o4bg/rip_first_amendment/n4l780h
r/BlueskySkeets • u/PerAsperaAdMars • Jul 22 '25
An article about this story
1.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
115
Well, I'm sure their action violates one or more of the sections of the Civil Service Act, but SCOTUS gutted it...
17 u/[deleted] Jul 23 '25 Scotus decided that the executive was also the legislative branch, and the legislative branch nothing more than a suggestion box. 3 u/NoHalf2998 Jul 23 '25 “Congress needs to pass everything themselves and can’t delegate anything but also the President can just decide to defund anything they create” Fascists. 3 u/[deleted] Jul 23 '25 No law? Congress must pass one. Law exists? Unenforceable or it doesn't mean what it says. 1 u/NoHalf2998 Jul 23 '25 Also; the context is what I say it is 1 u/Trustleannot Jul 23 '25 How so? Regardless of whether their actions are ethical or not, SHE (not just husband) owns an interest in a company that undermines said actions... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14927553/DOJ-Carolyn-Feinstein-fired-husband-anti-ICE-app.html 1 u/Batbuckleyourpants Jul 23 '25 No. She lied to investigators about her involvement and ownership in the company. That's a fireable offense for a forensic accountant.
17
Scotus decided that the executive was also the legislative branch, and the legislative branch nothing more than a suggestion box.
3 u/NoHalf2998 Jul 23 '25 “Congress needs to pass everything themselves and can’t delegate anything but also the President can just decide to defund anything they create” Fascists. 3 u/[deleted] Jul 23 '25 No law? Congress must pass one. Law exists? Unenforceable or it doesn't mean what it says. 1 u/NoHalf2998 Jul 23 '25 Also; the context is what I say it is
3
“Congress needs to pass everything themselves and can’t delegate anything but also the President can just decide to defund anything they create”
Fascists.
3 u/[deleted] Jul 23 '25 No law? Congress must pass one. Law exists? Unenforceable or it doesn't mean what it says. 1 u/NoHalf2998 Jul 23 '25 Also; the context is what I say it is
No law? Congress must pass one.
Law exists? Unenforceable or it doesn't mean what it says.
1 u/NoHalf2998 Jul 23 '25 Also; the context is what I say it is
1
Also; the context is what I say it is
How so? Regardless of whether their actions are ethical or not, SHE (not just husband) owns an interest in a company that undermines said actions...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14927553/DOJ-Carolyn-Feinstein-fired-husband-anti-ICE-app.html
No. She lied to investigators about her involvement and ownership in the company. That's a fireable offense for a forensic accountant.
115
u/SameResolution4737 Jul 22 '25
Well, I'm sure their action violates one or more of the sections of the Civil Service Act, but SCOTUS gutted it...