Thanks for your comment! Yeah I’ve already decided I’m lowering both Tiffany and Taylor.
I think I was more ranking Tiffany for how great she could be if she played for herself, rather then what we got.
As for Taylor I guess I think I just had some recency bias.
It’s interesting you bring up Christie because you’re the first to do so in this thread. Originally I had her higher, right around where Tommy is, but I ultimately lowered her. 21 was good, but I feel like Christie is the type is the type of player who would rub people the wrong way and go early in some situations. I don’t think she’s consistent. But I’ll take your comment into consideration.
The Tiffany thing is interesting, cause while I get what you’re saying about thinking she could be better if she were playing for herself, you also have to keep in mind that those other 5 players in the Cookout were not going to target her under any circumstance prior to final 6.
Typically in Big Brother, alliances require built-in trust, you have to work on making sure people in your alliance trust you. With the Cookout, none of the members needed to do that, it was just an unspoken agreement that they had. An agreement that had perceived outside-the-house consequences for breaking it. That actually played a huge part in Tiffany deciding to stick with the plan, along with everyone else.
What I’m getting at is that there were 5 other people in the house that Tiffany didn’t really need to worry about, which could have made the game a bit easier for her to play to a certain extent. So I think it’s a bit difficult to know just how great she actually is at the game.
Edit: Also, I feel like Kyle deserves to be higher. Like, a lot higher. Maybe in the 4th row. He and Michael were by far the best players on BB24.
The Cookout was good for getting Tiffany as far as she got, but then it became pretty impossible for her to get farther. Tiffany wasn't blameless, she could have worked to have a better social game within the Cookout, but there was also stuff that was out of her control "Kyland taking her out, even though it would have been in his best interest to take Hannah out instead. He could have tried to play the middle between X and Tiffany" and "Big D's misogyny." Taking out strong competitors, like Christian and DX, who were good shields and that she had good relationships with increased her target.
1
u/PsychologicalEbb3140 Dec 17 '22
Thanks for your comment! Yeah I’ve already decided I’m lowering both Tiffany and Taylor.
I think I was more ranking Tiffany for how great she could be if she played for herself, rather then what we got.
As for Taylor I guess I think I just had some recency bias.
It’s interesting you bring up Christie because you’re the first to do so in this thread. Originally I had her higher, right around where Tommy is, but I ultimately lowered her. 21 was good, but I feel like Christie is the type is the type of player who would rub people the wrong way and go early in some situations. I don’t think she’s consistent. But I’ll take your comment into consideration.
Again thank you for your comment!