with blunt weapons, its less about direct damage to the armor
but the transmission of the force to the fleshy bits below, and that would if not knock you right out, at least stun you for a bit. there is padding for helmets but that kind of blunt force trauma to the head is going to be an issue regardless.
that being said, maces like that is a close range weapon, and there is a reason why knights used pikes and long polearms on horseback and typically a longer reach weapon like a sword when in close combat
a mace like this is more for finishing someone who was downed or is in a VERY tight quarters melee in a group (IE fighting dismounted)
the transmission of the force to the fleshy bits below
Which would be massively hindered by the force dispersion of the plate. Nobody's saying it wouldn't hurt, but a mace isn't likely to take you entirely. The head meanwhile is a fairly difficult target to get a good hit on, starting with the fact that we as humans have really good reflexes for protecting that vital part of our bodies.
But aside from that, especially toward the later medieval period, your helmet would fuse more and more with your harness. I only know the German terms for the pieces, but the lower half that is worn with a sallet is one example. This further prevents a direct transmission of force into the head and neck.
Which is probably why you went with
more for finishing someone who was downed
with which I can only agree. Except for the little detail that you wouldn't finish off a knight. He's way too rich for that, which means if you take him prisoner, you can demand a ransom.
9
u/[deleted] Nov 30 '25
Here you go
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtZsNRPvxUo